@itosettiMD_MBA @JGPharmD https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@itosettimd mba@jgpharmdhttps://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@JGPharmD Probably on recirculated air. Many recent cars will do this automatically to save fuel. Making sure ventilation is set to non-reticulate helps ventilation a lot (measured with CO2 meter).

@JGPharmD可能是循环空气。许多最近的汽车会自动这样做以节省燃料。确保通风设置为非网状有助于通风（用二氧化碳计测量）。

@mgerrydoyle Thread deleted

@删除了mgerrydoyle线程

@GenXVotes @EricTopol 4th dose 0-2 months looks much higher than 3rd dose 0-2 months. Points toward suggesting significant added protection beyond restoring waning, but I may be wrong.

@GenxVoces@EricTopol第4次给药0-2个月看起来比第3次给药0-2个月高得多。除了恢复衰退之外，我还提出了重要的额外保护措施，但我可能错了。

@Ferg54482343 @driusan Most places if they vaccinate 5 year olds at all, the uptake rate is very low.

@Ferg54482343@driusan大多数地方如果他们给5岁的孩子接种疫苗，接种率非常低。

@Record_Factory @TehseenLadha @sdbaral @DickZoutman Politics are always fluid.

@Record_Factory@TehseenLadha@sdbaral@DickZoutman政治总是不稳定的。

@nedbh @DickZoutman @sdbaral Mathematically you would only need 100% compliance if the measures are just barely minimally adequate, probably not the case.

@nedbh@DickZoutman@sdbaral从数学上讲，如果这些措施仅仅是最低限度的充分，那么你只需要100%的合规性，可能情况并非如此。

@AbundantLandUse @HereToLearnFrom Polio is eliminated in most of the world.

@世界上大部分地区都已消除了脊髓灰质炎的大量传播。

@wsbgnl The recommendations for what to do when getting to that much worse situation are as watered down as the colors, if not more so. https://t.co/m04tn9bWrg

@wsbgnl当情况变得更糟时，如何应对的建议与颜色一样被淡化，如果不是更多的话。https://t.co/m04tn9bWrg

@lurkernonumbers @Noahpinion STDs aren't a measure of your personal character either.

@潜伏分子@Noahpinion性病也不是衡量你个人性格的标准。

@LazarusLong13 @BernieDogs4 @ProfCharlesHaas @JReinerMD You could likely recreate a lot of it from photos.

@LazarusLong13@BernieDogs4@ProfCharlesHaas@jreinerm你可能会从照片中重现很多。

@ChicagoPhotoSho @EconguyRosie Recessions start at peak, right?

@ChicagoPhotoSho@EconguyRosie衰退始于顶峰，对吗？

@Mw_ottawa @JimRosenthal4 I see filters marketed as "PM2.5" without more detail. I saw that on Starkvind description but didn't realize there was additional certification.

@Mw_ottawa@JimRosenthal4我看到过滤器在市场上被称为“PM2.5”，但没有更多细节。我在StarkWind的描述中看到了这一点，但没有意识到还有额外的认证。

@Kathryn78917961 @APazyryk @BallouxFrancois @sdbaral Cost benefit, agree of course. It is doubtful that any of the places that suppressed had greater impacts than those that didn't. Specifics matter of course, eg. measures at schools and (ugh) parks vs restaurants.
"Moderate" mitigation is probably the worst strategy of all.

@凯瑟琳78917961@APazyryk@BallouxFrancois@sdbaral成本效益，当然同意。令人怀疑的是，任何一个被压制的地方都比那些没有压制的地方产生了更大的影响。细节当然很重要，例如学校和（呃）公园与餐厅的措施。
“适度”缓解可能是最糟糕的策略。

@Kathryn78917961 @APazyryk @BallouxFrancois @sdbaral Even before November, efficacy may not have been "clear" but there was good reason to believe it, again suppression if acceptable cost is a good gamble. Worst case is purely delayed impact, which is still a benefit.

@Kathryn78917961@APazyryk@BallouxFrancois@sdbaral即使在11月之前，疗效可能还不“明确”，但有充分的理由相信这一点，如果可接受的成本是一个很好的赌博的话。最糟糕的情况是纯粹的延迟影响，这仍然是一个好处。

@Kathryn78917961 @APazyryk @BallouxFrancois @sdbaral Similar strategies worked in Vietnam, South Korea, Japan (technically an island nation but a very large one), etc. Scandinavia (ex Sweden) and Germany, by European standards, suppressed reasonably well too.

@Kathryn78917961@APazyryk@BallouxFrancois@sdbaral类似的策略在越南、韩国、日本（技术上是一个岛国，但规模非常大）等国家都奏效。按照欧洲的标准，斯堪的纳维亚（瑞典除外）和德国的压制也相当不错。

@Kathryn78917961 @APazyryk @BallouxFrancois @sdbaral It was clear they would be effective by first readout, November 2020. Six months of suppression is a reasonable gamble, especially when done with low economic impact (both Taiwan and South Korea did well economically).

@Kathryn78917961@APazyryk@BallouxFrancois@sdbaral很明显，到2020年11月第一次读数时，它们将生效。六个月的镇压是一场合理的赌博，尤其是在经济影响较小的情况下（台湾和韩国在经济上都做得很好）。

@Kathryn78917961 @APazyryk @BallouxFrancois @sdbaral And again, deaths (and other benefits) delayed is a benefit. All we can ever do is delay death. "Delaying the inevitable" is a fallacy of composition which misses the fact that ever individual benefits from delay.

@Kathryn78917961@APazyryk@BallouxFrancois@sdbaral同样，延迟死亡（和其他福利）也是一种福利。我们所能做的就是推迟死亡。“推迟不可避免的事情”是一种编造谬误，它忽略了一个事实，即每个人都能从延迟中受益。

@Kathryn78917961 @APazyryk @BallouxFrancois @sdbaral It was clear by mid 2020 if not sooner there were almost certainly going to be vaccines, although details of efficacy and specific time to complete trials and deliver in volume were as yet unknown.

@Kathryn78917961@APazyryk@BallouxFrancois@sdbaral到2020年年中，疫苗几乎肯定会出现，但疗效细节以及完成试验和批量交付的具体时间尚不清楚。

@JimRosenthal4 @Mw_ottawa How good are PM2.5 filters?

@JimRosenthal4@Mw_渥太华PM2有多好。5个过滤器？