Aeon 的最新消息

@sdbaral @APazyryk @BallouxFrancois https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@Kathryn78917961 @APazyryk @BallouxFrancois @sdbaral That looks a lot like two years of successful supression to me. If you're elderly that might be 10-30% of your life expectancy. For everyone else, it looks like buying time to vaccinate and also maintaining low economic impact.

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@sdbaral@APAzyryk@BallouxFrancoishttps://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@Kathryn78917961@APazyryk@BallouxFrancois@sdbaral在我看来,这很像两年的成功压制。如果你是老年人,这可能是你预期寿命的10-30%。对其他所有人来说,这似乎是在争取时间接种疫苗,同时保持较低的经济影响。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Kathryn78917961 @APazyryk @BallouxFrancois @sdbaral That looks a lot like two years of successful supression to me. If you're elderly that might be 10-30% of your life expectancy. For everyone else, it looks like buying time to vaccinate and also maintaining low economic impact.

@Kathryn78917961@APazyryk@BallouxFrancois@sdbaral在我看来,这很像两年的成功压制。如果你是老年人,这可能是你预期寿命的10-30%。对其他所有人来说,这似乎是在争取时间接种疫苗,同时保持较低的经济影响。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Marco_Piani @medriva Interesting that NY is showing similar exponential rate of growth as when delta was spreading in November pre-omicron (when it appeared to speed up). I guess coincidence.

@Marco_Piani@medriva有趣的是,纽约呈现出类似于去年11月在奥米克龙之前三角洲扩张时的指数增长率(当时它似乎在加速)。我猜是巧合。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@juli_bg_bs @gadboit @LGFi0rnkELg0KDn Not necessarily. Why assume infectious dose there is higher than someone exposed during long shifts in a crowded poorly ventilated workplace? Particularly since home contacts might at least try to isolate at first symptoms but someone w/o sick pay might tough it out at work.

@juli_bg_bs@gadboit@LGFi0rnkELg0KDn不一定。为什么要假设感染剂量高于在拥挤、通风不良的工作场所长时间轮班时接触的人?尤其是因为家庭接触者可能至少会在第一时间尝试隔离症状,但没有病假工资的人可能会在工作中难以忍受。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@wsbgnl @AshishKJha46 @CameronWebb46 I don't know how KFF is assessing "likely to be eligible for a booster" but those numbers look too high overall (the CDC numbers look more plausible). Nearly everyone vaccinated is eligible for a booster (except 5-12) and yet the total boosters given isn't that high.

@wsbgnl@AshishKJha46@CameronWebb46我不知道KFF是如何评估“可能有资格获得助推器”的,但这些数字总体上看起来太高了(CDC的数字似乎更可信)。几乎所有接种疫苗的人都有资格获得助推器(5-12岁除外),但总的助推器数量并没有那么高。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@LazarusLong13 @DLeonhardt That's very fair in general, but on this specific issue (effective and adequate ventilation), they're almost all starting far behind and doing little to improve.

@LazarusLong13@DLeonhardt这在总体上是非常公平的,但在这个特定的问题上(有效和充分的通风),他们几乎都远远落后,几乎没有做什么改进。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@LazarusLong13 @DLeonhardt Heh, I'm not sure THIS is an instance of racism. The whiter schools mostly haven't effectively improved their ventilation systems either!

@LazarusLong13@DLeonhardt嘿,我不确定这是种族主义的例子。白人学校大多也没有有效改善通风系统!

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@michaelmina_lab @EricTopol How would you characterize the instances where improvised throat swab is positive but not nose swab? e.g. this WHCD attendee
https://twitter.com/juliaioffe...

Pro-tip, courtesy of @NatalieGExum, test the back of the throat, not just the nose. The test on the right is just the nose. The one on the left is the throat. Taken half an hour apart. https://t.co/C8Zg3r2qHi

发表时间:4年前 作者:Julia Ioffe @juliaioffe

@michaelmina_lab@EricTopol您如何描述即兴喉拭子呈阳性而鼻拭子呈阴性的情况?e、 g.这位WHCD与会者
https://twitter.com/juliaioffe...

专业提示,由@NatalieGExum提供,测试喉咙后部,而不仅仅是鼻子。右边的测试就是鼻子。左边的是喉咙。相隔半小时。https://t.co/C8Zg3r2qHi

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@andyaschmidt @gezuskreistkim @EricTopol You can't really judge a faint line on an old test from long after the observation period.

@而Yaschmidt@gezuskreistkim@EricTopol在观察期结束后的很长一段时间里,你真的无法在旧测试中判断出一条微弱的线。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@MoiraMinceir @MelpomeneMel Summary: 12% reduction in occurrence of a list of vague and common symptoms that didn't necessarily have anything to do with covid, and mostly weren't (nearly all PCR negative).

@MoiraMinceir@MelpomeneMel总结:一系列模糊和常见症状的发生率降低12%,这些症状不一定与新冠病毒有关,而且大多与新冠病毒无关(几乎所有PCR阴性)。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Marco_Piani @MarionKoopmans Probably some studies got this wrong by only accounting for prior confirmed infection.

@Marco_Piani@MarionKoopmans可能是因为一些研究只考虑了之前确认的感染,而弄错了这一点。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@wsbgnl @HillStarry As I said the first time, I think in practice it is likely to be the same. Not because every person need make the same choices on conscience vs compliance, but because compliance (and/or aligning policy views) will be selected in hiring, as it likely was the last time.

@正如我第一次说的,我认为在实践中很可能是一样的。不是因为每个人都需要在良心和合规上做出相同的选择,而是因为合规(和/或调整政策观点)将在招聘中被选中,就像上次一样。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@mliffmann @TrentTelenko There were minimal masks.

@mliffmann@TrentTelenko有最小的面具。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@wsbgnl @HillStarry Well, there is most probably a spectrum, but don't assume a replacement would not be even more compliant either. The outcome of "How could it get any worse?" is often that it in fact gets worse.

@wsbgnl@hillstrary嗯,很可能有频谱,但不要认为替换也不会更符合要求。“怎么会变得更糟?”事实上,情况往往会变得更糟。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@HillStarry @wsbgnl She's doing what she's told. Anyone chosen to replace her would do the same.

@HillStarry@wsbgnl她在照她说的做。任何被选来接替她的人都会这么做。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@james1chas3 @bbcworldservice Tell me about those hard core lockdowns in Alabama.

@james1chas3@bbcworldservice告诉我阿拉巴马州的那些核心封锁。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@HermionesFury @DrLeanaWen Most is close to correct. All is not. There's objective data on this, for example, TSA boarding still down significantly from 2019.
Anyway not really relevant since what she's suggesting in terms of tools involving tests, treatments, etc. is not pre-pandemic normal.

@赫敏·斯伯里@DrLeanaWen Most几乎是正确的。一切都不是。有客观数据表明,例如,从2019年开始,美国运输安全管理局的登机人数仍大幅下降。
无论如何,这并不是真的相关,因为她在涉及检测、治疗等工具方面的建议在大流行前并不正常。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Infoseepage @LazarusLong13 @IHME_UW @AtomsksSanakan Agree although I've been skeptical that wastewater levels may not be stable over time or across variants. Without calibration it's mostly a directional indicator, not unlike reported cases.

@Info渗流@LazarusLong13@IHME_UW@AtomsksSanakan同意这一点,尽管我一直怀疑废水水平可能不会随时间或不同变量而稳定。在没有校准的情况下,它主要是一个方向指示器,与报告的案例没有什么不同。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@SandyRo32513986 @UniversalMaski2 @CDCgov @danaparish @MarkedByCovid @kdurquiza @emilygraymd_mph @megansims22 @ErinSandersNP @LastGreatAct @dianaberrent @JuliaRaifman @FutureDocs That's PCR and it's exceedingly rare to the point of irrelevance anyway.
https://twitter.com/alexmeshki...

We require PCR negative tests for our employees. We haven’t had one stay positive for than 18 days from detection to negative. (We test everyone daily).
We haven’t had a single entertainment customer (250k+ positives) stay positive for more than 25 days including the wild type

发表时间:4年前 作者:Alex Meshkin, GED @alexmeshkin

@SandyRo32513986@UniversalMaski2@CDCgov@danaparish@MarkedByCovid@kdurquiza@emilygraymd_-mph@megansisms22@ErinSandersNP@lastgreatat@dianaberrent@JuliaRaifman@FutureDocs这是PCR,而且极其罕见到了无关紧要的程度。
https://twitter.com/alexmeshki...

我们要求对员工进行PCR阴性检测。从检测到阴性,我们已经有18天没有一例呈阳性。(我们每天测试每个人)。
我们没有一个娱乐客户(250k+阳性)超过25天保持阳性,包括野生型

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@LazarusLong13 Low occupancy at least.

@LazarusLong13至少入住率较低。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情