Aeon 的最新消息

@james1chas3 @medriva @ChristosArgyrop IFR may in fact be negative.

@james1chas3@medriva@ChristosArgyrop IFR实际上可能是阴性的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@LucaFerrettiEvo It means doing nothing but accepting the dramatically increased continued level of disease and death.
Much like one might decide to "live with" a damaged knee rather than go for surgery.

@LucaFerrettiEvo这意味着什么也不做,只是接受疾病和死亡水平持续大幅上升的事实。
就像一个人可能决定“与”受伤的膝盖一起生活,而不是去做手术一样。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@BeezyManzell @kittypurrzog I'm sure it was meant as a joke but student debt is almost $2 trillion.

@BeezyManzell@kittypurrzog我相信这是一个玩笑,但学生债务几乎是2万亿美元。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@zeikonline @wsbgnl @erinbiba Mask mandates don't mean that, and don't even need to mean that to be useful. Not all transmission happens in restaurants. Reducing transmission on busses means less transmission.
Arguing from extremes is not helpful here at all.

@zeikonline@wsbgnl@erinbiba面具授权并不意味着这一点,甚至不需要意味着这一点才有用。并非所有的传播都发生在餐馆。减少总线上的传输意味着减少传输。
在这里,从极端出发进行辩论毫无帮助。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@HughThunkIt @JeromeAdamsMD Expect being blocked if she sees it.

@HughThunkIt@JeromeAdamsMD预计,如果她看到它,就会被屏蔽。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@chargrille @j_g_allen It's odd really, because for a while he was pushing ventilation (it's his academic speciality). What is the purpose of ventilation other than to reduce transmission?

@Chargrill@j_g_allen这真的很奇怪,因为有一段时间他一直在推动通风(这是他的学术专长)。除了减少传播之外,通风的目的是什么?

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@successorgobars @dianaberrent https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@JMGraglia @dianaberrent Here is the general list. The official criteria is "Healthcare providers should consider the benefit-risk for an individual patient"
https://www.cdc.gov/coronaviru...

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@SuccessorGobars@dianaberrenthttps://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@这里是总列表。官方标准是“医疗保健提供者应考虑单个患者的利益风险”
https://www.cdc.gov/coronaviru...

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JMGraglia @dianaberrent Here is the general list. The official criteria is "Healthcare providers should consider the benefit-risk for an individual patient"
https://www.cdc.gov/coronaviru...

@这里是总列表。官方标准是“医疗保健提供者应考虑单个患者的利益风险”
https://www.cdc.gov/coronaviru...

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@chargrille @j_g_allen He understands, he just pretends not to.

@Chargrill@j_g_allen他明白,他只是假装不明白。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JeromeAdamsMD The quote was worse. It was "we have many more tools". No we don't. We have mostly the same tools, and one or two more (with limited availability).

@JeromeAdamsMD的说法更糟。这是“我们有更多的工具”。不,我们没有。我们基本上有相同的工具,还有一两个(可用性有限)。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@ts_hodl Honey badger doesn't give a fuck.

@亲爱的獾才不管呢。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@jmcrookston Statements like "no proof _____" are often strictly speaking accurate but irrelevant. You don't operate an incident response (or anything else in the real world) in basis of proof or lack of proof. Success rests on weighing probabilities and contingencies.

@像“无证据”这样的jmcrookston陈述通常严格来说是准确的,但并不相关。你不会在证据或缺乏证据的基础上操作事件响应(或现实世界中的其他任何事情)。成功取决于权衡可能性和偶然性。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@GidMK I don't think it's any worse than any other employer abuse. Pay check has to show regular minimum total wage+tips. If employer wants to fake hours or whatever, could do that anyway.

@我不认为这比任何其他雇主虐待更糟糕。工资支票必须显示定期最低总工资+小费。如果雇主想虚报工作时间或其他什么,无论如何都可以这么做。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@BernieDogs4 Trying to explain social consciousness and empathy to Joseph Allen is like trying to explain NFTs to a caveman.

@伯尼狗试图向约瑟夫·艾伦解释社会意识和同理心,就像试图向穴居人解释NFT一样。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@ChristosArgyrop (2) in a few cases, right?

@ChristosArgyrop(2)在少数情况下,对吗?

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@GidMK It's required to get enough tips to at least reach the regular minimum (still very low), otherwise the employer has to make up the difference (likely they will terminate anyone with such poor tipping, in practice).

@GidMK要求获得足够的小费,以至少达到正常最低水平(仍然很低),否则雇主必须弥补差额(实际上,他们可能会解雇任何付小费如此少的人)。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@tnicholsmd Contagious up to 12 days according to Taiwan. Some cases did not read peak viral load per Ct until 8 days. I don't see how viral load can increase via non-viable virus.
https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/...

@据台湾称,tnicholsmd可在12天内传染。有些病例直到第8天才读取每台Ct的病毒载量峰值。我不明白病毒载量是如何通过非存活病毒增加的。
https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/...

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@tnicholsmd @equibotanica "Most expensive rapid tests" is a bit out of context here. They're proctored tests where you get a report, not just the test itself.

@tnicholsmd@equibotanica“最昂贵的快速测试”在这里有点脱离上下文。它们是监考测试,你可以得到一份报告,而不仅仅是测试本身。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@ShellyStardust1 @MegaDa13034961 @BRENDABLUEWAVE @coniinthegarden @DrEricDing @whca @nalticx False. No testing or vaccination requirement for workers.
https://khn.org/morning-breako...

@ShellyStardust1@MegaDa13034961@BRENDABLUEWAVE@ConientGarden@Drericing@whca@nalticx假。无需对工人进行检测或接种疫苗。
https://khn.org/morning-breako...

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情