@916_stevo @GrayConnolly I don't trust China's statistics generally, but sometimes tin foil hat theories are just that.

@916\u stevo@GrayConnolly我一般不相信中国的统计数字，但有时锡箔帽理论就是这样。

@916_stevo @GrayConnolly Yeah, let's just waste millions of solar panels for show, to game a statistic nobody really cares about.
Might be able to with infrared or something, not sure.

@916\u stevo@GrayConnolly是的，让我们浪费数百万块太阳能电池板来作秀，来玩一个没人真正关心的统计游戏。
也许可以用红外线什么的，不确定。

@OmicronData @MichaelSFuhrer @colourmeamused_ @PeacockFlu 3% is too high to be considered meaningful retrospectively (as your second sentence suggests). If it had been every switching every two variants, and possibly other patterns, we'd start to wonder about that too.
Still, it *may* be significant.

@OmicronData@MichaelSFuhrer@colormemamused\uuu@piockoflu 3%太高了，不能被认为是有意义的回顾（正如你的第二句话所示）。如果是每两个变体切换一次，可能还有其他模式，我们也会开始怀疑这一点。
尽管如此，这可能是非常重要的。

@GrayConnolly Solar is easy to count by satellite. If its far off someone should be able to prove that.

@GrayConnolly太阳能公司很容易通过卫星进行计数。如果还很远的话，应该有人能证明这一点。

@Griffith17431 @violin_health @alexmeshkin @brownecfm You can get a test in a pharmacy. Doesn't have to be a testing center.

@Griffith17431@Vionil\u health@alexmeshkin@brownecfm您可以在药房进行测试。不必是测试中心。

@alexmeshkin @sleepyknave Past tense is wrong. It's still needed.

@alexmeshkin@sleepyknave过去式是错误的。仍然需要它。

@Nutmeg031992 @andyaschmidt @EricTopol @PNASNews @g_leech_ 1. This doesn't measure mandates, it measures actual mask usage.
2. NPIs would account for a lot of the politics

@肉豆蔻031992@andyaschmidt@EricTopol@PNASNews@g\U leech\u1。这并不衡量授权，而是衡量实际的掩码使用情况。
2、NPI将在很大程度上解释政治

@equeslaw @EricTopol @hkumed Feel better soon.

@Equislaw@EricTopol@HKUME很快就会感觉好些。

@ChadDigums @EricTopol @hkumed BA4/5 is going to be worse. But the frog is comfy in the "hot tub".

@ChadDigums@EricTopol@hkumed BA4/5的情况会更糟。但是青蛙在“热水浴缸”里很舒服。

@kabulykos @spooknine @Noahpinion I do agree that the California recall process is poor. What should happen upon successful removal is a caretaker followed by scheduled general election.

@kabulykos@spooknine@Noahpinion我同意加州的召回程序很糟糕。成功罢免后，将发生的是一个看守人，然后按计划举行大选。

@kabulykos @spooknine @Noahpinion In this thread, what was claimed was the similar "recalls are dumb". I don't agree with that.
But vote against the Chesa recall by all means if you're against it (and live in SF), that's perfectly fine.

@kabulykos@spooknine@Noahpinion在这条帖子中，声称类似的“召回是愚蠢的”。我不同意这一点。
但是，如果你反对（并且住在旧金山），那就一定要投票反对Chesa召回计划，这很好。

@ChadDigums @CDCDirector @CDCgov She did a podcast, does that count?

@ChadDigums@cdcddirector@CDCgov她做了一个播客，算吗？

@Nutmeg031992 @andyaschmidt @EricTopol @PNASNews @g_leech_ The study does account for changes in mobility and NPIs which likely accounts for a large portion of the behavior changes both directly and indirectly. Usage of masks itself remains as a significant predictive variable.

@肉豆蔻031992@andyaschmidt@EricTopol@PNASNews@g\u leech\u该研究确实解释了迁移率和NPI的变化，这可能直接和间接地解释了大部分行为变化。口罩本身的使用仍然是一个重要的预测变量。

@pglover @spooknine @Noahpinion The conditions may have changed. That's also a legitimate and important reason for a leadership change. Or not. If he's not recalled, that's the end of that.

@pglover@spooknine@Noahpinion条件可能已经改变。这也是领导层更迭的合法而重要的原因。或者不是。如果他没有被召回，那就完了。

@kabulykos @spooknine @Noahpinion And no, recalls aren't "routinely abused". There are thousands of elected officials in California alone, and most never face a recall even over a long career.

@kabulykos@spooknine@Noahpinion不，召回并不是“经常被滥用”。仅在加利福尼亚州就有数千名当选官员，即使在漫长的职业生涯中，大多数官员也从未面临罢免。

@kabulykos @spooknine @Noahpinion CEOs get rolling performance reviews, by the board/shareholders. If there is a loss of confidence, out. It doesn't wait for a fixed term.

@kabulykos@spooknine@Noahpinion首席执行官获得董事会/股东的滚动绩效评估。如果失去信心，请退出。它不需要等待一个固定的期限。

@walidgellad @BenMazer Waning immunity and poor cross immunity with BA.2?

@walidgellad@BenMazer免疫力减弱，与BA交叉免疫力差。2.

@CoachesCornerGA @DailyStuffMag Because it is bait. You engage by saying you don't see it, that's what they want.

@CoachesCornerGA@DailyStuffMag，因为它是诱饵。你说你看不到，这就是他们想要的。

@spooknine @Noahpinion There is probably not a single private sector or NGO job where if you do a shitty job, you're not out on your ass. Even with an employment contract, it'll get paid out in order to bring in better leadership. Same is good government, whether YOU call it dumb or not.

@斯普克宁@诺亚皮宁可能没有一个私营部门或非政府组织的工作，如果你做了一份差劲的工作，你就不会出丑。即使有雇佣合同，也会得到报酬，以便带来更好的领导力。好政府也是如此，不管你说它愚蠢与否。

@lebon80 @andyaschmidt @EricTopol @PNASNews @g_leech_ Also, no one said to "give priority". He posted one study, it's interesting, throw it in the hopper of science.

@lebon80@andyaschmidt@EricTopol@PNASNews@g\u leech\u同样，没有人说要“优先考虑”。他发表了一篇研究报告，很有趣，把它扔进了科学的漏斗里。