@loscharlos @LongCovidNYC @CDCgov One example, San Francisco (bottom graph shown). Official cases are approximately 1/4 of where they were in January, but wastewater shows actual infections are even higher!
https://twitter.com/michaelzli...

@loscharlos@LongCovidNYC@CDCgov旧金山（下图）。官方病例约为1月份的1/4，但废水显示实际感染率更高！
https://twitter.com/michaelzli...

@LongCovidNYC @loscharlos @CDCgov (Recent case data likely inaccurate due to holiday reporting.)

@LongCovidNYC@loscharlos@CDCgov（由于假日报告，最近的病例数据可能不准确。）

@LongCovidNYC @loscharlos @CDCgov Nationally (sort of, coverage isn't that great) wastewater, in dark blue, is up 8x, while reported cases, in light blue, only up 5x.
In local areas with more intense surges, the disparity is probably higher.
https://biobot.io/data/ https://t.co/HCLcNNUUZY

@LongCovidNYC@loscharlos@CDCgov National（在某种程度上，覆盖率并不是很高）废水的深蓝色增加了8倍，而报告的浅蓝色病例仅增加了5倍。
在浪涌较为剧烈的局部地区，差距可能更大。
https://biobot.io/data/ https://t.co/HCLcNNUUZY

@loscharlos @LongCovidNYC @CDCgov There is probably at least half a million, probably more, in reality. Wastewater shows very few of the infections are being reported as "official" cases.

@loscharlos@LongCovidNYC@CDCgov事实上可能至少有50万，甚至更多。废水显示，很少有感染被报告为“官方”病例。

@Blessed395 @selinawangtv @CNN If you test everybody all the time and isolate the cases, it doesn't spread, people don't get hospitalized and the don't die.
Is that worth it? I don't know, but the two aren't unrelated.

@祝福395@selinawangtv@CNN如果你一直测试每个人并隔离病例，它不会传播，人们不会住院，也不会死亡。
这值得吗？我不知道，但这两者并非毫无关联。

@selinawangtv @CNN Covid isn't going to be gone any time soon, so this seems not that relevant a concern in practice.

@selinawangtv@CNN冠状病毒不会很快消失，所以这在实践中似乎不是一个相关的问题。

@psuedonyms @jmcrookston @DavidElfstrom (I clipped incorrectly here. The 111 was out of a total reported of 190 or 58%.)

@psuedonyms@jmcrookston@DavidElfstrom（我在这里剪错了。报告的总数为190人，占58%，其中111人。）

@psuedonyms @jmcrookston @DavidElfstrom 42% of the cases in England are not known to be gay or bisexual men. This seems not widely reported.
https://www.gov.uk/government/... https://t.co/UwqvJDS0lx

@在英国，42%的案件都不是同性恋或双性恋男性。这似乎没有被广泛报道。
https://www.gov.uk/government/... https://t.co/UwqvJDS0lx

@jmcrookston @DavidElfstrom At this rate, in approximately two months, one million cases. At some point immunity should become significant, but probably not soon.

@jmcrookston@DavidElfstrom按照这个速度，在大约两个月内，有100万起案件。在某种程度上，免疫应该变得重要，但可能不会很快。

@jmcrookston @DavidElfstrom There has been no meaningful change in trajectory since May 21.
Log chart - straight lines indicate constant doubling time, currently every 5-6 days. https://t.co/v5yoRe1xMa

@DavidElfstrom的jmcrookston自5月21日以来，轨迹没有任何有意义的变化。
对数图-直线表示恒定的倍增时间，目前每5-6天一次。https://t.co/v5yoRe1xMa

@JoannaInNY_MPH @alexmeshkin @cdc Uh, not any time soon?

@JoannaInNY\u MPH@alexmeshkin@cdc呃，不是很快吗？

@yoshkapundrick @EverlastDD @LazarusLong13 @LawrenceGostin @ResearcherGrace @CDCgov If your leg is sore, what's the reason? Banging it against the corner of the bed? Not a disease. Arthritis, neuropathy, infection, etc.? Diseases.

@yoshkapundrick@EverlastDD@LazarusLong13@LawrenceGostin@ResearcherGrace@CDCgov如果你的腿酸痛，原因是什么？把它撞在床角上？不是一种疾病。关节炎、神经病变、感染等。？疾病。

@yoshkapundrick @EverlastDD @LazarusLong13 @LawrenceGostin @ResearcherGrace @CDCgov If the condition is not transient and brought on by a physical stimulus or injury, then yes it is a disease. If you sneeze or cough once (e.g. to clear food), it may not be a disease. Allergies, for example, are a chronic disease. Not all diseases are severe or life threatening.

@yoshkapundrick@EverlastDD@LazarusLong13@LawrenceGostin@ResearcherGrace@CDCgov如果这种情况不是暂时的，不是由身体刺激或伤害引起的，那么它是一种疾病。如果你打喷嚏或咳嗽一次（例如为了清理食物），这可能不是一种疾病。例如，过敏是一种慢性病。并非所有疾病都很严重或威胁生命。

@joshua_eaton @sarahjeong The article says the opposite of the headline.

@joshua\u eaton@sarahjeong这篇文章的标题正好相反。

@yoshkapundrick @EverlastDD @LazarusLong13 @LawrenceGostin @ResearcherGrace @CDCgov https://t.co/2GBNuYlgI3

@yoshkapundrick@EverlastDD@LazarusLong13@LawrenceGostin@ResearcherGrace@CDCgovhttps://t.co/2GBNuYlgI3

@yoshkapundrick @EverlastDD @LazarusLong13 @LawrenceGostin @ResearcherGrace @CDCgov Do you?
Someone who has symptoms has disease. Even someone without acute symptoms who experiences higher vulnerability to secondary conditions post-infection also has disease.

@yoshkapundrick@EverlastDD@LazarusLong13@LawrenceGostin@ResearcherGrace@CDCgov你呢？
有症状的人有疾病。即使没有急性症状、感染后更容易出现继发性疾病的人也有疾病。

@yoshkapundrick @EverlastDD @LazarusLong13 @LawrenceGostin @ResearcherGrace @CDCgov These vaccines no longer have much efficacy in stopping disease (beyond a month or two of boosting). They reduce hospitalizations and deaths, that's not the same as stopping disease.

@yoshkapundrick@EverlastDD@LazarusLong13@LawrenceGostin@ResearcherGrace@CDCgov这些疫苗在阻止疾病方面不再有多大效力（超过一到两个月的增强期）。他们减少了住院和死亡，这与阻止疾病不同。

@yoshkapundrick @EverlastDD @LazarusLong13 @LawrenceGostin @ResearcherGrace @CDCgov It's not even close to 99% effective, as you would see if you actually read that paper.

@yoshkapundrick@EverlastDD@LazarusLong13@LawrenceGostin@ResearcherGrace@CDCgov这甚至还没有接近99%的效果，如果你真的读了那篇文章，你就会看到。

@yoshkapundrick @EverlastDD @LazarusLong13 @LawrenceGostin @ResearcherGrace @CDCgov Testing was done everyday under Trump. The issue is capacity and whether people can get access when they need it without long lines and big backlogs during surges that make the tests useless. They can't under Biden or Trump.

@在特朗普的领导下，yoshkapundrick@EverlastDD@LazarusLong13@LawrenceGostin@ResearcherGrace@CDCgov每天都在进行测试。问题是容量，以及人们是否可以在需要时获得访问权限，而不必在激增期间排长队和大量积压，这使得测试毫无用处。他们不能在拜登或特朗普的领导下。

@yoshkapundrick @EverlastDD @LazarusLong13 @LawrenceGostin @ResearcherGrace @CDCgov This is EXACTLY the same as Trump, minus the "slow the testing down" rhetoric. Under Trump there was ample testing during low points, not during surges. Biden, exact same.

@yoshkapundrick@EverlastDD@LazarusLong13@LawrenceGostin@ResearcherGrace@CDCgov这与特朗普完全一样，没有“放慢测试速度”的言辞。在特朗普的领导下，在低谷时期有大量的测试，而不是在暴涨时期。拜登，完全一样。