@TheSunShine_ @FrontiersIn @FrontClinDiab Families are only genetic and don't have lifestyle traits?
To try to pin this down you might look at twins raised together or separately. But it's hard to do.

@Sunshine\uu@frontiresin@FrontClinDiab家族只是遗传的，没有生活方式特征？
为了确定这一点，你可以看看一起或分开长大的双胞胎。但这很难做到。

@MoniRuna7 @PadresSuns @sdbaral Someone who didn't have to take a bus to work serving tables in a restaurant, selling jewelry in shop, etc. and was instead paid to stay home was indeed protected. You may not consider that worth the costs but it is absolutely protective.

@MoniRuna7@PadresSuns@sdbaral一个不必坐公共汽车去餐馆服务桌子、在商店出售珠宝等工作，却得到报酬呆在家里的人确实受到了保护。你可能认为这不值得付出代价，但这绝对是一种保护。

@ChrisACole @JeromeAdamsMD @sdbaral It was almost two years later

@ChrisACole@JeromeAdamsMD@sdbaral差不多两年后

@canntrader @sdbaral @ezralevant And if the latter don't isolate, then they increase crowding in the stores and businesses being shared by those lower middle class/working class people. More crowding = EVEN MORE exposure.
You have to separate pre-existing risk due to job function. Lockdowns didn't cause that.

@canntrader@sdbaral@ezralevant，如果后者不孤立，那么他们会增加中下层/工人阶级共享的商店和企业的拥挤。更多拥挤=更多暴露。
由于工作职能，您必须分离先前存在的风险。封锁不是原因。

@bobepidemiology @longfacehorse @sdbaral What's "workplace closure"?
Just about every non-essential business is a workplace? Essential by definition means it can't be closed, the rest can.

@bobepidemiology@longfacehorse@sdbaral什么是“工作场所关闭”？
几乎所有不必要的业务都是一个工作场所？本质的定义是，它不能被关闭，其余的可以。

@epilady @JeromeAdamsMD @sdbaral In practice it was hard enough to send out funds almost indiscriminately. It it plausibly possible to target better and do so more efficiently, but that won't happen without preparation (which as far as I can tell, no one is doing nor planning to do).

@epilady@JeromeAdamsMD@sdbaral实际上，几乎不分青红皂白地发放资金已经够难的了。似乎有可能更好地确定目标，更有效地做到这一点，但如果没有准备，这是不可能的（据我所知，没有人正在做，也没有人计划做）。

@LaneyCowanLC @_Eric_Reinhart @Random__Kids @sdbaral Transit workers are specifically mentioned and there is no question whatsoever that transit usage declined dramatically with non-essential workers not needing to use it to go to work. The lower occupancy almost certainly reduced exposure to transit workers relative to no closures

@特别提到了LaneyCowanLC@Eric\u Reinhart@Random\u Kids@sdbaral公交工人，毫无疑问，公交使用量大幅下降，非必要的工人不需要使用它来上班。与没有关闭相比，较低的入住率几乎肯定会减少交通工人的风险敞口

@LaneyCowanLC @_Eric_Reinhart @Random__Kids @sdbaral This found that essential workers had higher rates of infection than non-essential workers. It did not find that essential workers had higher risk of infection than the counterfactual without closures.

@LaneyCowanLC@Eric\uReinhart@Random\uuu Kids@sdbaral这发现基本工的感染率高于非基本工。它没有发现基本工人比没有关闭的反事实工人有更高的感染风险。

@CleanAirStars @maskupmelb @kate_cole_ @chrislee @CorsIAQ Perhaps same cost over time, but may be more convenient not to change as frequently.

@maskupmelb@kate\u cole\u@chrislee@CorsIAQ的CleanAirStars随着时间的推移可能会花费相同的成本，但不频繁更换可能会更方便。

@CleanAirStars @maskupmelb @kate_cole_ @chrislee @CorsIAQ 4x filters should last longer than 1x in an actual Starkvind

@maskupmelb@kate\u cole\uCrislee@CorsIAQ的CleanAirStars 4x过滤器在实际StarkWind中的使用时间应超过1x

@DrDuchovny @CorsIAQ Using tape for the "shroud" is clever. Sorry to hear about your mom. Hope family is holding up.

@CorsIAQ的Duchovny博士用胶带做“裹尸布”很聪明。很抱歉听到你妈妈的事。霍普一家挺过来了。

@mike_frederick @dbustac @dickiebush Somewhat paradoxically, this observation may increase the value of no code.

@mike\u frederick@dbustac@dickiebush有点矛盾，这种观察可能会增加no代码的价值。

@SamirMadi01 @PeterAttiaMD Is there some reverse causality where risk of severe falls increase in those with declining health? It may be it is the underlying decline that leads to high mortality, and the fall is more of an indicator.

@SamirMadi01@PeterAttiaMD健康状况下降的人发生严重跌倒的风险增加是否存在某种反向因果关系？可能是潜在的下降导致了高死亡率，而下降更像是一个指标。

@jolly1766 @jimhubbell6177 @RadioFreeTom "by nature of their training in understanding risk and preventing the spread of infectious disease"
In other words, they have training and expertise relevant to the problem. Maybe those are the people you should listen to, not politicians and influencers.

@jolly1766@jimhubbell6177@RadioFreeTom“根据他们在了解风险和防止传染病传播方面的培训性质”
换言之，他们拥有与问题相关的培训和专业知识。也许这些是你应该倾听的人，而不是政客和有影响力的人。

@jolly1766 @jimhubbell6177 @RadioFreeTom Yeah half a year or less, half more than a year. It's been a little over a year. So the idea of still masking now is basically in the middle, nothing crazy at all, even in the absence of new information about vaccine-evading variants.

@jolly1766@jimhubbell6177@RadioFreeTom是的，半年或半年以下，半年以上。已经一年多了。因此，现在仍然掩盖的想法基本上处于中间，没有什么疯狂的，即使没有关于疫苗逃避变体的新信息。

@HFentonMudd @LoboGerda @RadioFreeTom @mehdirhasan Source
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@HFentonMudd@LoboGerda@RadioFreeTom@mehdirhasan源
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@HFentonMudd @LoboGerda @RadioFreeTom @mehdirhasan https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@Hventonmudd@LoboGerda@RadioFreeTom@mehdirhasanhttps://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@APazyryk @LoboGerda @RadioFreeTom @mehdirhasan It may be that severe cases demonstrate the post-acute cognitive changes in a more obvious way but less severe cases still have subtle changes. This is of course entirely speculative.

@APazyryk@LoboGerda@RadioFreeTom@mehdirhasan重症病例可能以更明显的方式显示急性后认知变化，但不太严重的病例仍有细微变化。这当然完全是推测。

@findmeabluebird @nailatrahman @RogueVictorian @3M @OSHA_DOL Amazon I don't entirely trust in terms of fakes, but may be okay. Hard to tell.

@findmeabluebird@nailatrahman@RogueClectorian@3M@OSHA\U DOL Amazon我不完全相信假货，但可能没问题。很难说。

@jolly1766 @jimhubbell6177 @RadioFreeTom That's revisionist. At the time it wasn't even known there would be effective vaccines (but expected). Once there were vaccines, it wasn't known there would be a variant in a year that would continue to spread and infect and kill vaccinated people. Situation has always been fluid

@jolly1766@jimhubbell6177@RadioFreeTom这是修正主义者。当时甚至不知道是否会有有效的疫苗（但这是意料之中的）。一旦有了疫苗，不知道一年内会不会有一种变异病毒继续传播、感染并杀死接种疫苗的人。形势一直不稳定