Aeon 的最新消息
@MarvinH2_G2 @ChristosArgyrop @0bj3ctivity @NjbBari3 @FinchTH @ZiikZiiii @fitterhappierAJ @lisa_iannattone @mildanalyst @AnyVictoria10 @JT_Grindrod @jmcrookston I'm not sure it's even well defined. R0 is very different in Manhattan or Mumbai as opposed to rural Saskatchewan.
Is R0 supposed be an average across the entire human race? How is that useful?
@MarvinH2\u G2@ChristosArgyrop@0bj3ctivity@NjbBari3@FinchTH@Zikziiii@fitterhappierAJ@lisa\u iannattone@mildanalyst@AnyVictoria10@JT\u Grindrod@jmcrookston我甚至不确定它是否定义明确。曼哈顿或孟买的R0与萨斯喀彻温省的农村地区非常不同。
R0应该是整个人类的平均值吗?这有什么用?
@jmcrookston Well in surgery with an open incision I can see it being more significant, but usually the targets (eyes, mouth) are just going to be really small. Not to say it can never happen but under similar conditions much less likely than inhaling.
@jmcrookston在开放式切口的手术中,我可以看到它更重要,但通常目标(眼睛、嘴巴)会非常小。并不是说它永远不会发生,但在类似的条件下,发生这种情况的可能性比吸入要小得多。
@not4u2no3 @BenMonroe1 @BruceyXRP @konstructivizm The Hubble telescope wouldn't be any less USG than the lunar observer anyway. But like I said elsewhere, you can bounce a laser off the retroreflectors left there. Those aren't natural phenomena.
@not4u2no3@BenMonroe1@BruceyXRP@konstructivizm无论如何,哈勃望远镜的USG不会低于月球观测者。但正如我在其他地方所说,你可以将激光从留在那里的后向反射器上反射回来。这些不是自然现象。
@not4u2no3 @BenMonroe1 @BruceyXRP @konstructivizm You are correct, but you (well, someone with the right equipment) can shine a laser and get a return from the laser reflectors left behind.
@不是4U2NO3@BenMonroe1@BruceyXRP@konstructivizm你说得对,但你(嗯,有合适设备的人)可以照射激光,并从留下的激光反射器中获得回报。
@RobChan66733000 @EricTopol @CDCMMWR Not much there on ventilation though, apart from masks and outdoor instruction. That outdoor instruction seemed significant suggests indoor ventilation not very good.
@RobChan66733000@EricTopol@CDCMMWR除了面罩和户外指导外,通风方面没有太多。室外指导似乎很重要,这表明室内通风不是很好。