ETH 的最新消息

@ameensol You should have started with $1 imo. People can relate to the idea of non-American dollars that have something close to but not quite a 1:1 exchange rate.

@ameensol你应该从imo的1美元开始。人们可能会想到非美元的汇率接近但不完全是1:1。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@danrobinson Handle exchanges using some explicit separate process.

@danrobinson使用一些明确的单独流程处理交换。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@danrobinson Short term, don't worry and accept the imperfection. Longer term, ZK proof of humanity or other POAPs/SBTs.

@丹罗宾逊:短期内,不要担心,接受不完美。长期来看,ZK证明人性或其他POAP/SBT。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

The obvious precedent is FDIC insurance (up to $250k per person)
An interesting unrelated one is Singapore employment law. Stronger regulation for low-earning employees, and a more figure-it-out-yourself approach for the wealthier.
IMO things like this are good hybrid formulas. https://t.co/25XkfE8UVc

显而易见的先例是FDIC保险(每人高达25万美元)
一个有趣的不相关的是新加坡就业法。对低收入员工实行更严格的监管,对富人采取更明智的做法。
在我看来,这是很好的混合公式。https://t.co/25XkfE8UVc

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

Strongly support this. Coordinated sympathy and relief for the average UST smallholder who got told something dumb about "20% interest rates on the US dollar" by an influencer, personal responsibility and SFYL for the wealthy. https://twitter.com/PersianCap...

The second way is to prioritize smaller wallets. People who had a couple thousand or more of UST deposited in Anchor.
If Terra just focussed on the "poorest" 99.6% of wallets, then they could make this gigantic group 100% whole.
Yes, you read that right!
4/

发表时间:4年前 作者:PersianCapital 📖 @PersianCapital

强烈支持这一点。协调对普通UST小农的同情和救济,他们被一个影响者、个人责任和SFYL告诉了一些愚蠢的关于“美元利率20%”的事情。https://twitter.com/PersianCap...

第二种方法是优先考虑较小的钱包。有几千个或更多的UST沉积在锚中的人。
如果Terra只关注99.6%的“最穷”钱包,那么他们可以让这个庞大的群体100%完整。
是的,你读对了!
4/

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

RT: ⟠ Latest Week in Ethereum News!
🐼 @trent_vanepps Ropsten testnet to upgrade to PoS around June 8
🚂 @parithosh_j mainnet shadow fork 4 looked perfect
⏩ @nethermindeth beta snap sync
https://weekinethereumnews.com...
Thanks to @clrfund for making this issue possible 🙏

转发:⟠ 最近一周以太坊新闻!
🐼 @trent_vanepps Ropsten testnet将于6月8日左右升级至PoS
🚂 @Paritosh_j mainnet shadow fork 4看起来很完美
⏩ @nethermindeth beta快照同步
https://weekinethereumnews.com...
感谢@clrfund让这个问题成为可能🙏

发表时间:4年前 作者:Ethereum @ethereum详情

@wolftivy Excel should rebrand itself to a "functional reactive programming language".

@wolftivy Excel应该将自己重新命名为“函数式反应式编程语言”。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@sassal0x @technocrypto Agree hard on this, with the one quibble that "algostable" has become a propaganda term serving to legitimize uncollateralized stables by putting them in the same bucket as collateralized stables like DAI/RAI, and we need to really emphasize that the two are very different.

@sassal0x@technocrypto对此非常赞同,有一种说法是,“算法稳定”已经成为一个宣传术语,通过将无抵押马厩与DAI/RAI等抵押马厩放在同一个桶中,从而使其合法化,我们需要真正强调的是,这两者是非常不同的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

RT: Stop "experimenting" with ponzis, algostables, yield farming and other unsustainable nonsense.
Start experimenting with public goods funding, governance/DAOs, decentralized identity/reputation, regenerative finance and privacy tools.
This is the gwei.

RT:停止“试验”庞氏骗局、阿尔戈马厩、高产农业和其他不可持续的胡说八道。
开始尝试公共品融资、治理/DAO、分散的身份/声誉、再生金融和隐私工具。
这是gwei。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

RT: [New Post] zkPairing: zkSNARKs for Elliptic Curve Pairings
@jonathanpwang, @vvhuang_, and @theyisun present elliptic curve pairings in circom--unlocking BLS signatures, recursive verification, polynomial commitment verification, and more in groth16 (1/n)
https://0xparc.org/blog/zk-pai...

转发:[New Post]zkPairing:椭圆曲线对的zkSNARKs
@jonathanpwang、@vvhuang_uu和@theyisun在circom中展示椭圆曲线对——在groth16(1/n)中解锁BLS签名、递归验证、多项式承诺验证等
https://0xparc.org/blog/zk-pai...

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@llllvvuu @MikeSylphDapps @evan_van_ness @glenweyl @pujaohlhaver SBTs don't have to be revocable. I think the intent of the piece is that revocation / edit-by-issuer is *sometimes* a useful functionality, but you can still do lots of really cool stuff without it.

@llllvvuu@Mikesylphdaps@evan_van_ness@glenweyl@pujaohlhaver SBT不必是可撤销的。我认为这篇文章的目的是,发行人撤销/编辑有时是一个有用的功能,但没有它,你仍然可以做很多非常酷的事情。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@v_almonacid Because a pool that wanted to evade it could just present itself as N separate pools.

@v_almonacid,因为一个想要躲避它的池可能只会呈现为N个独立的池。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@Rob1Ham Bitcoin community had to make a pretty serious social campaign to deal with mining pool centralization on multiple occasions.

@Rob1Ham比特币社区不得不在多个场合开展相当严肃的社会活动,以应对采矿池集中问题。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@Charles51680628 That's even better. Incentivizes solo staking.

@查理51680628那就更好了。激励单人下注。

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

Speculative controversial take: we should legitimize price gouging by top stake pool providers. Like, if a stake pool controls > 15%, it should be accepted and even *expected* for the pool to keep increasing its fee rate until it goes back below 15%. https://twitter.com/superphiz/...

I wonder, who will be the first staking provider to publicly commit to limiting themselves to not operating more than 22% of validators on the chain? Who do you want to see step up to the plate and prioritize beacon chain health above profits?

发表时间:4年前 作者:superphiz.eth 🦇🔊🐼 @superphiz

投机性的有争议的做法:我们应该让顶级股份池提供商的价格欺诈合法化。比如,如果股份池控制>;15%应该被接受,甚至“期望”泳池继续提高收费率,直到低于15%。https://twitter.com/superphiz/...

我想知道,谁会是第一个公开承诺限制自己操作链上超过22%的验证器的赌注提供商?你希望看到谁站出来,将信标链健康置于利润之上?

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

RT: Better late than never, another @ethereum #AllCoreDevs recap. Tons of Merge updates on today's call!
Agenda: https://github.com/ethereum/pm...
Stream: https://youtu.be/BFxkGdPv4F8
Recap below 👇🏻 https://twitter.com/TimBeiko/s...

RT:迟到总比不到好,另一个@ethereum#AllCoreDevs回顾。在今天的通话中有大量的合并更新!
议程:https://github.com/ethereum/pm...
流:https://youtu.be/BFxkGdPv4F8
下面重述一下👇🏻 https://twitter.com/TimBeiko/s...

发表时间:4年前 作者:Ethereum @ethereum详情

It's about to get Dank
Danksharding, that is
Come hear why EIP4844 is the new EIP1559
- @dankrad (the Dank in Danksharding)
- @protolambda (the Proto in ProtoDanksharding)
- @VitalikButerin (community member)
- Moderated by @TimBeiko!
LIVE IN 1 HOUR!
https://youtu.be/N5p0TB77flM https://t.co/7q1bdm0gDo

发表时间:4年前 作者:Bankless 🏴 @BanklessHQ

现在说话!https://twitter.com/BanklessHQ...

快湿透了
丹克沙丁,就是这样
来听听为什么EIP4844是新的EIP1559
-@dankrad(丹克沙丁的潮湿)
-@protolambda(ProtoDanksharding中的Proto)
-@VitalikButerin(社区成员)
-由@TimBeiko主持!
再过一小时!
https://youtu.be/N5p0TB77flM https://t.co/7q1bdm0gDo

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

RT: I *think* this is a more accurate picture of Ethereum consensus client diversity recently https://t.co/0QsocORx1y

RT:我认为这是以太坊最近达成共识的客户多样性的更准确的描述https://t.co/0QsocORx1y

发表时间:4年前 作者:Ethereum @ethereum详情

@iyad_elbaghdadi What are some examples of countries that are facing grave security threats but, in your opinion, do a good job of respecting human rights despite that constraint? What can we learn from them?

@iyad_elbaghdadi有哪些国家面临着严重的安全威胁,但在你看来,尽管存在这种限制,但在尊重人权方面做得很好?我们能从他们身上学到什么?

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@GernotWagner @ShengwuLi Pretty much this. It's a substitute conclusion for when the presenter can't think of a good conclusion.
Source: have been a presenter many times and have failed to come up with a good conclusion many of those times. 😄

@格诺瓦格纳@ShengwuLi差不多就是这样。当演讲者想不出一个好的结论时,这是一个替代结论。
资料来源:我做过很多次演讲,但很多次都没有得出好的结论。😄

发表时间:4年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情