用户 Curve(@ CurveFinance) 的最新消息

@el_nilz @cyounessi1 @tztokchad @dnsvckvc @napgener @pornzie @NasserSaoud @Tetranode @MonetSupply @PrimozKordez @MarkoStemberger Uhmm... Actually it was backed just by ETH back then

@el_nilz@cyounessi1@tztokchad@dnsvckvc@napgener@pornzie@NasserSaoud@Tetranode@MonetSupply@PrimozKordez@MarkoStemberger Uhmm。。。事实上,当时只有ETH支持

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@Tetranode wait, is Gensler also a frog?

@等等,詹斯勒也是青蛙吗?

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@two__cheers Ust is a different system which is allowed in principle to be under-collateralized temporarily, but it is more risky than always-overcollateralized stablecoins

@“两张支票”是一种不同的制度,原则上允许暂时进行抵押,但它比通常的过度抵押证券风险更大

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@cyounessi1 @tztokchad @dnsvckvc @napgener @pornzie @NasserSaoud @Tetranode @MonetSupply @PrimozKordez @MarkoStemberger Well, regardless, it was fairly clear that it will be made whole😅 While showing how important it is to get the liquidations right

@Cyouness1@tztokchad@dnsvckvc@napgener@pornzie@NasserSaoud@Tetranode@MonetSupply@PrimozKordez@MarkoStemberger不管怎样,很明显,它将变得完整😅 同时表明正确清算是多么重要

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@BeverageFinance 👀

@BeverageFinance👀

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@dnsvckvc @napgener @pornzie @NasserSaoud @Tetranode @tztokchad @MonetSupply Few % undercollateralized, to be more precise. Shocking that DAI was trading 1-2% above 1.0 all that time! Those were fun times

@更准确地说,dnsvckvc@napgener@pornzie@NasserSaoud@Tetranode@tztokchad@MonetSupply几%的欠结晶。令人震惊的是,戴相龙一直在1.0以上交易1-2%!那是有趣的时光

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@napgener @pornzie @NasserSaoud @Tetranode @tztokchad @MonetSupply As soon as mim/3crv is close to the peg, it's safe to do.
Basically:
A=100 is very safe for depegs but less fees (usdn chose that);
A=2000 - about maximum amount of fees on average, but no cool for depegs.
A=500 would probably be the ideal compromise.

@napgener@pornzie@NasserSaoud@Tetranode@tztokchad@MonetSupply一旦mim/3crv接近销钉,就可以安全操作。
基本上:
A=100对depegs来说非常安全,但费用较低(usdn选择);
A=2000——大约是平均最高费用,但对depegs来说并不酷。
A=500可能是理想的折衷方案。

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@napgener @pornzie @NasserSaoud @Tetranode @tztokchad @MonetSupply MIM remained over 100% backed all that time.
Unlike, for example, DAI after March 2020 (though it was above the peg all the time while being a bit insolvent).
Peg != solvency. However, lower A would lead to a better stability in such times, so indeed should be lowered

@napgener@pornzie@NasserSaoud@Tetranode@tztokchad@MonetSupply MIM在这段时间里一直保持100%以上的支持率。
例如,与2020年3月后的戴相龙不同(尽管戴相龙在有点资不抵债的情况下一直处于高于固定汇率的水平)。
佩格!=偿付能力然而,在这种情况下,A值越低,稳定性越好,因此确实应该降低A值

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@K_mpec80 @THORmaximalist @FreddieRaynolds Agreed. Interestingly, a lot of arbs happened via UST route where UST pool has a smaller A (MIM<>UST<>3crv or MIM<>UST---USTw<>3crv).
Anyhow, better to reduce A when pool is close to the peg, not when it's still quite off-peg

@K_mpec80@THORmaximalist@FreddieRaynolds表示同意。有趣的是,很多ARB都是通过UST路线发生的,其中UST池的a较小(MIM<;>;UST<;>;3crv或MIM<;>;UST---USTw<;>;3crv)。
无论如何,最好是在资金池接近固定汇率时减少,而不是在资金池仍处于固定汇率时

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@gggonecrypto @cobie Thanks, that's very educating!

@谢谢,这很有教育意义!

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@MrBeaverTail @Avalanche_Tu @Platypusdefi Slippage or actual price? Don't confuse the two please.
As for Platypus design: why doesn't the close path integral add also (arbitrary) f_{ij} (part of F_...) - it can change as you go along the path. Wouldn't non-constant value of it break path-independence? https://t.co/goZLWolyID

@beavertail@Avalanche_Tu@Platypusdefi滑移还是实际价格?请不要混淆两者。
至于鸭嘴兽设计:为什么闭合路径积分不加(任意)f_{ij}(f_j的一部分…)当你沿着这条路走的时候,它可能会改变。它的非常量值不会破坏路径独立性吗?https://t.co/goZLWolyID

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

Some new rewards on https://bribe.crv.finance/ from @TheTNetwork and @AngleProtocol. Looks sweet for veCRV holders! https://t.co/b3l3qrMjZr

一些新的奖励https://bribe.crv.finance/来自@TheTNetwork和@AngleProtocol。对veCRV持有者来说很可爱!https://t.co/b3l3qrMjZr

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@smoothgotchi @DefiMoon Yes!

@smoothgotchi@DefiMoon是的!

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@MrDuckbill @Avalanche_Tu @Platypusdefi Let me double down here actually. What needs to be well-researched is what happens if the oracle gets front-ran

@鸭嘴兽先生,雪崩图,鸭嘴兽,让我在这里加倍。需要好好研究的是,如果甲骨文抢先一步会发生什么

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

RT: Looks like ParaSwap will be entering the #CurveWars soon with a budget of 45m $PSP for 2022. The plan is to launch a $PSP/ETH V2 pool and buy & lock $CVX to vote: https://gov.paraswap.network/t... https://t.co/thVLETQ8Xy

RT:看来ParaSwap将很快进入#CurveWars,2022年的PSP预算为4500万美元。该计划将推出一个价值$PSP/ETH V2的池,并购买&;锁定$CVX进行投票:https://gov.paraswap.network/t... https://t.co/thVLETQ8Xy

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@DefiMoon whoah

@哇

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@w0000CE0 Yes, MIM cap is decreasing unfortunately: FUD makes price lower, and lower price incentivizes closing loans at a discount (which pushes the mim price a bit back up)

@w0000CE0是的,MIM上限正在下降。不幸的是:FUD降低了价格,而较低的价格激励了以折扣价关闭贷款(这将MIM价格推高了一点)

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@SamMiorelli @_bout3fiddy_ Overcollateralized stablecoins can stay depegged for months while staying fundamentally safe (as DAI pre-PSM past shows)

@SamMiorelli@_bout3fiddy__uu过度折叠的马厩可以在基本安全的情况下保持数月不受保护(如DAI pre PSM过去所示)

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@MrDuckbill @Avalanche_Tu @Platypusdefi Well, explain please if you can (want to know!), but however many times I read the yellow paper, it looks like the terminal exchange rate is the actual exchange rate, and it is proportional to the oracle rate f (not equal to it of course - proportional)
https://twitter.com/CurveFinan...

@WAGMIpost @MrDuckbill @Avalanche_Tu @Platypusdefi Explain, maybe this is misunderstood? https://t.co/GU3KD18TWJ

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve Finance @CurveFinance

@Duckbill@Avalanche_Tu@Platypusdefi先生如果可以的话请解释一下(想知道!),但不管我读了多少次白皮书,最终汇率似乎就是实际汇率,它与甲骨文汇率f成比例(当然不等于它——成比例)
https://twitter.com/CurveFinan...

@WAGMIpost@MrDuckbill@Avalanche_Tu@Platypusdefi解释一下,也许这是误解了?https://t.co/GU3KD18TWJ

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@WAGMIpost @MrDuckbill @Avalanche_Tu @Platypusdefi Explain, maybe this is misunderstood? https://t.co/GU3KD18TWJ

@WAGMIpost@MrDuckbill@Avalanche_Tu@Platypusdefi解释一下,也许这是误解了?https://t.co/GU3KD18TWJ

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情