@cobie Who is Satoshi then?

@科比那谁是佐藤？

@TendermintTimmy @StefanPatatu @napgener Yeah, it's fairly good. Heard that problems appear when you need sub-1% precision, but above that it's very solid

@TendermintTimmy@stefanpattu@napgener是的，相当不错。听说当你需要低于1%的精度时会出现问题，但高于1%的精度是非常可靠的

@TendermintTimmy @StefanPatatu @napgener Chainlink is really good and it's relied upon by many platforms. The internal ema is was pretty much an experiment which seems to show pretty good results: very resilient and precise. Of course, cannot change immediately when a price spike happens, but maybe it shouldn't

@TendermintTimmy@Stefanpatu@napgener Chainlink非常好，很多平台都依赖它。内部ema几乎是一个实验，似乎显示了相当好的结果：非常有弹性和精确。当然，当价格飙升时，价格不会立即改变，但也许不应该

@Aronado @blknoiz06 This shows the sidelines pretty well (see the tiny pink spot on the right side of the distribution) https://t.co/Vu1LR7Yaum

@Aronado@blknoiz06这很好地显示了边线（参见分布右侧的小粉色点）https://t.co/Vu1LR7Yaum

@Aronado @blknoiz06 That's what the system is. It makes money from FUD... Better than something which stops working and waiting on the sidelines in those times!

@Aronado@blknoiz06这就是系统。它从FUD赚钱。。。总比在那个时候停止工作，袖手旁观要好！

@DegenSpartan Too late to panic: already arbed back. Good bye MIM for 0.97, that price did not last long

@德根斯帕坦已经来不及恐慌了：他已经回来了。再见，MIM的价格是0.97，这个价格并没有持续多久

@CurveCap 2.8B or something. Let's see if we beat that

@CurveCap 2.8B什么的。让我们看看能不能打败它

@THORmaximalist The real reason is: A=2000 is a bit too high for such events. Unwinding positions on abracadabra only becomes profitable when it's 5/95 or so.
If it was A=500 or lower, it'd be profitable to do this arb at much smaller imbalance.
On the plus side, A=2000 gives more fees

@真正的原因是：A=2000对于这样的事件来说有点太高了。abracadabra上的平仓只有在5/95左右时才会盈利。
如果A=500或更低，以更小的不平衡度进行arb是有利可图的。
从好的方面来看，A=2000会带来更多的费用

@instantjesus In DeFi, you get it dropped on you every second

@耶稣在德菲的那一刻，你每一秒都会被扔到你身上

Good stablecoin FUD makes good volumes and fees for us. Keep it up guys https://t.co/SCPxreci1U

好的stablecoin FUD为我们带来了不错的销量和费用。继续，伙计们https://t.co/SCPxreci1U

@0xAlunara holy f

@0xAlunara 神圣的 f

@FreddieRaynolds Wormhole UST is 0.996

@FreddieRaynolds虫洞UST为0.996

@McWaterCap @danielesesta Just like with DAI. Demand is from those who close their borrowing positions

@McWaterCap@danielesesta就像DAI一样。需求来自那些关闭借款头寸的人

@JaroCrypto @bobreideverest Casting @ChrisBlec in the thread

@JaroCrypto@bobreideverest铸造@ChrisBlec在线程中

@bobreideverest @0xYoki At worst it'd be banning the US from the future. And when protocols are really decentralized - only hard censorship of internet (China-mode) can partly enforce while promoting the growth of underground, uncontrolled economy (which is opposite of what they want)

@bobreideverest@0xYoki最糟糕的情况是，它将禁止美国进入未来。当协议真正分散时，只有严格的互联网审查（中国模式）才能部分实施，同时促进地下的、不受控制的经济增长（这与他们想要的相反）

@0xYoki @bobreideverest True, this is why Uniswap banned anything which could be called a security (like, security-tracking tokens) from their UI

@0xYoki@bobreideverest True，这就是为什么Uniswap禁止用户界面中任何可以称为安全性的东西（比如安全跟踪令牌）

@bobreideverest "that trade Treasuries and other government securities"

@bobreideverest“交易美国国债和其他政府证券”

@CFrogE1 @DefiMoon Wen fud factory for making fees.
Oh wait

@CFrogE1@Defimoun Wen fud工厂收取制造费。
哦等等

@Avalanche_Tu @Platypusdefi Platypus algo isn't the worst though. It just has a high risk of losing money (b/c using external oracles) when fluctuations are high. Which happens in exactly this FUD situation, as well as would have been with LUSD last week (due to liquidation-induced depeg upwards)

@雪崩_Tu@Platypusdefi Platypus algo并不是最糟糕的。它只是在波动较大时有很高的赔钱风险（b/c使用外部预言器）。这正是在FUD的情况下发生的，以及上周LUSD的情况（由于清算导致depeg上升）

@Avalanche_Tu @Platypusdefi Meaning it's best ever. Thanks

@雪崩_-Tu@Platypusdefi意味着这是有史以来最好的。谢谢