@nvy_0x @ne1k0 @DefiSafety @CurveCap @newmichwill @ConvexFinance @CFrogE1 @gggonecrypto @pray_eth @ETH_Daily @WeekInEthNews Uhm... Still unclear, to be honest. Which things currently not timelocked should be timelocked?
Changes in fees, admin fees etc are timelocked. Parameter ramps are not timelocked but has limits on speed.

@nvy_0x@ne1k0@DefiSafety@CurveCap@newmichwill@ConvexFinance@CFrogE1@gggonecrypto@pray_eth@eth_Daily@WeekInEthNews Uhm。。。老实说，目前还不清楚。哪些当前未被时间锁定的内容应该被时间锁定？
费用、管理费等的变化是及时锁定的。参数坡道没有时间锁定，但对速度有限制。

@CFrogE1 @DefiMoon $LUSD is new $SAI

@CFrogE1@DefiMoon$LUSD是新的$SAI

@ConvexHorder @MrBeaverTail @crypto_condom @Platypusdefi @ConvexFinance @CurveCap @DefiMoon Emergency DAO still cannot touch user funds

@ConvexOrder@MrBeaverTail@crypto_避孕套@Platypudefi@ConvexFinance@CurveCap@DefiMoon紧急DAO仍然无法触及用户资金

@EphMith @MrBeaverTail @crypto_condom @Platypusdefi @ConvexFinance @CurveCap @DefiMoon The ability for the team to take user money (directly or via upgrade) is an extremely huge liability. Users basically trust the (anon!) team. All the financial regulators would be on red alert on that one

@EphMith@MrBeaverTail@crypto_避孕套@platypudefi@convxfinance@CurveCap@DefiMoon团队收取用户资金（直接或通过升级）的能力是一项极其巨大的责任。用户基本上信任（anon！）团队所有的金融监管机构都会对此保持红色警戒

@MrBeaverTail @crypto_condom @Platypusdefi @ConvexFinance @CurveCap @DefiMoon In our case, no one ever could touch user funds or upgrade contracts. Even now governance cannot.
Upgradadability controlled by the team = team holding all those user money.
Upgradability itself is introducing more problems than it solves. Just Say No!

@MrBeaverTail@crypto_避孕套@Platypusdefi@ConvexFinance@CurveCap@DefiMoon在我们的案例中，任何人都无法触及用户资金或升级合同。即使是现在，治理也不能。
由团队控制的可升级性=持有所有用户资金的团队。
可升级性本身带来的问题比解决的问题还多。说不就行了！

@RufusTDefi There is "My dashboard" button on the front page: would that work?
There's also https://debank.com/ which shows everything very well, if a third-party tool is needed

@RufusTDefi头版有个“我的仪表板”按钮：这样行吗？
还有https://debank.com/如果需要第三方工具，它可以很好地显示所有内容

@MrBeaverTail @crypto_condom @Platypusdefi @ConvexFinance @CurveCap @DefiMoon Right, most probably the dealer used us to swap, that's it.
What worries is: are there admin controls which can touch LP money?

@beavertail@crypto_避孕套@platypudefi@convxfinance@CurveCap@DefiMoon对，很可能是经销商让我们交换的，就这样。
令人担忧的是：是否存在可以影响LP资金的管理控制？

@_BluMeanie @YettyWapp @crypto_condom @Platypusdefi @ConvexFinance @CurveCap @DefiMoon Yeah, definitely not a fork

@_Blumanie@YettyApp@crypto_避孕套@Platypusdefi@ConvexFinance@CurveCap@DefiMoon是的，绝对不是叉子

@samkazemian @statelayer @danrobinson @dirac_sol @joey__santoro ^ pretty cool discussion thread, huh!

@samkazemian@statelayer@danrobinson@dirac_sol@joey__santoro^非常酷的讨论帖子，哈！

@crypto_condom @Platypusdefi @ConvexFinance @CurveCap @DefiMoon Ohshi, looks safu and sec-friendly… anyway, thanks for the fees!

@crypto_避孕套@Platypusdefi@ConvxFinance@CurveCap@DefiMoon Ohshi，看起来很安全，对sec也很友好……总之，谢谢你的费用！

@0xngmi Actually makes sense. Good track record on etherscan = tested in prod

@0xngmi实际上是有道理的。etherscan的良好记录=在产品中测试

@Farmer0x @CurveCap It's really up to how long DAO is planning to lock for. If _very long_ - veCRV makes more sense of course

@Farmer0x@CurveCap实际上取决于DAO计划锁定多长时间。如果u很长uvecrv当然更有意义

@FreddieRaynolds @knsheely @THORmaximalist Well, Abra can change the limits of how many MIM are available to be minted. Maybe when combined with incentivized pools, it could be enough to manage the peg

@FreddieRaynolds@knsheely@THORmaximalist好吧，阿布拉可以改变可以铸造多少MIM的限制。或许，如果再加上激励性的资金池，就足以应对盯住美元的局面

@FreddieRaynolds @THORmaximalist @knsheely In DAI, merely manipulating the rates required quite some weeks to reflect into price, actually...

@FreddieRaynolds@THORmaximalist@knsheely在DAI，仅仅操纵利率需要好几周才能反映到价格中，实际上。。。

@FreddieRaynolds @THORmaximalist @knsheely That works.
But also, alternatively, when depeg happens - pool loses liquidity and gets token rewards per share up. So if one makes it impossible or expensive to borrow now - it'll push the price closer to the peg because of pool incentives being present.

@FreddieRaynolds@THORmaximalist@knsheely这很有效。
但也可以选择，当depeg发生时，pool失去流动性，每股获得象征性的回报。因此，如果一家银行现在无法或很昂贵地借钱，它将推动价格接近挂钩，因为存在共同激励。

@DavidNage @verified @Twitter No worries, who needs that checkbox really

@DavidNage@verified@Twitter不用担心，谁真的需要这个复选框

@martenJe @iearnfinance Wait did they brb that?

@martenJe@iearnfinance等等他们是不是把它弄坏了？

Looks like a vote for $YFI / $ETH pool has the highest-ever quorum. Voters love @iearnfinance? https://t.co/E63Oq3n9TN

看来$YFI/$ETH pool的投票人数是有史以来最高的。选民喜欢@iearnfinance？https://t.co/E63Oq3n9TN

@JonGalt14 @AaveAave Maybe some volatility risk parameter is involved?

@JonGalt14@aaveAve可能涉及一些波动性风险参数？

@fala133 @YettyWapp @JonGalt14 @CurveCap @AaveAave But cvxCRV doesn’t give voting power to those who buy

@fala133@YettyApp@JonGalt14@CurveCap@aaveAve，但cvxCRV并没有赋予购买者投票权