用户 Curve(@ CurveFinance) 的最新消息

@clemlak ...that's what Solidity devs have to dovery often. While in @vyperlang stack is never too deep!

@克莱姆拉克。。。这就是Solidity开发人员必须经常回避的问题。在@vyperlang中,堆栈永远不会太深!

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@groprotocol @DefiMoon @_bout3fiddy_ @peckshield @Kurt_M_Barry @code4rena @immunefi @trailofbits Trail of Bits is a good choice. Hard to get into schedule, but they're nice ones

@groprotocol@DefiMoon@u bout3fiddy@peckshield@Kurt\u M_Barry@code4rena@immunefi@trailofbits是一个不错的选择。很难进入日程,但他们很好

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@DefiMoon $1.4M worth at once is not bad huh

@一次140万美元也不错吧

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@CFrogE1 We'd give ourselves more for tests and less for docs😅

@我们会为测试付出更多,为医生付出更少😅

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@dddthreepo @SamMiorelli @CurveCap Not necessarily @NexusMutual insures against depeg though! There was @UnslashedF depeg insurance though for $USDN and $UST

@dddthreepo@SamMiorelli@CurveCap不一定是NexusMutual针对depeg投保的!有@UnslashedF depeg保险,但分别为$N和$UST

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@nvy_0x @StittsHappening @ne1k0 @DefiSafety @CurveCap @newmichwill @ConvexFinance @CFrogE1 @gggonecrypto @pray_eth @ETH_Daily @WeekInEthNews But anyhow. In curve-dao-contracts (attached) tests (*.py) >> code (*.vy). Some repositories have contracts repeated and saved for every deployment (for testing every of those with the same set of tests) https://t.co/DHiwlb3Gwl

@nvy_0x@stittsCasting@ne1k0@DefiSafety@CurveCap@newmichwill@ConvexFinance@CFrogE1@gggonecrypto@pray_eth@eth_Daily@WeekInEthNews,但无论如何。曲线dao合同(附件)测试(*.py)>>;代码(*.vy)。有些存储库为每个部署重复并保存了契约(用于测试具有相同测试集的每个部署)https://t.co/DHiwlb3Gwl

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@nvy_0x @StittsHappening @ne1k0 @DefiSafety @CurveCap @newmichwill @ConvexFinance @CFrogE1 @gggonecrypto @pray_eth @ETH_Daily @WeekInEthNews Ehh, should those be saved at all? We just run those periodically. "brownie test" and it all goes.
Moreover, coverage doesn't mean as much as stateful tests (could easily missed many bugs if we did just unit tests with perfect 100% coverage).

@nvy_0x@stittsCasting@ne1k0@DefiSafety@CurveCap@newmichwill@ConvexFinance@CFrogE1@gggonecrypto@pray_eth@eth_Daily@WeekInEthNews Ehh,这些应该被保存吗?我们只是定期运行。“布朗尼测试”就这样了。
此外,覆盖率并不像有状态测试那样重要(如果我们只进行100%覆盖率的单元测试,很容易漏掉很多bug)。

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@nvy_0x @StittsHappening @ne1k0 @DefiSafety @CurveCap @newmichwill @ConvexFinance @CFrogE1 @gggonecrypto @pray_eth @ETH_Daily @WeekInEthNews Btw kinda strange that you valued our docs more than tests. Actually, in tests we feel that we've tested *everything* and very confident in them: well beyond "unit testing".
While docs stay a moving target (new contracts appear faster than docs for them)

@nvy_0x@stittsCasting@ne1k0@DefiSafety@CurveCap@newmichwill@ConvexFinance@CFrogE1@gggonecrypto@pray_eth@eth_Daily@WeekInEthNews顺便说一句,你对我们的文档比对测试更重视,这有点奇怪。实际上,在测试中,我们觉得我们已经测试了所有东西,并且对它们非常自信:远远超出了“单元测试”。
而文档仍然是一个移动的目标(新合同的出现速度比它们的文档快)

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@nvy_0x @StittsHappening @ne1k0 @DefiSafety @CurveCap @newmichwill @ConvexFinance @CFrogE1 @gggonecrypto @pray_eth @ETH_Daily @WeekInEthNews Of course. Besides, that's not the only contract which has no admin controls even by the DAO: there are quite many. Most notable other example is GaugeController

@nvy_0x@stittsCasting@ne1k0@DefiSafety@CurveCap@newmichwill@ConvexFinance@CFrogE1@gggonecrypto@pray_eth@eth_Daily@WeekInEthNews当然了。此外,这不是唯一一个没有DAO管理控制的合同:有很多。另一个最著名的例子是GaugeController

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@DefiMoon whoah, wen vote

@哇,温投票

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@TedTabler @_bout3fiddy_ @EphMith @MrBeaverTail @crypto_condom @Platypusdefi @ConvexFinance @CurveCap @DefiMoon https://eth-brownie.readthedoc...

@TedTabler@u bout3fiddy@EphMith@MrBeaverTail@crypto_避孕套@Platypusdefi@ConvexFinance@CurveCap@DefiMoonhttps://eth-brownie.readthedoc...

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@nvy_0x @StittsHappening @ne1k0 @DefiSafety @CurveCap @newmichwill @ConvexFinance @CFrogE1 @gggonecrypto @pray_eth @ETH_Daily @WeekInEthNews Correct. Token contract has no workable admin function and only works as pre-preogrammed (e.g. inflation schedule is unchangeable, token name cannot even be changed, no token freezing, no upgrades etc)

@nvy_0x@stittsCasting@ne1k0@DefiSafety@CurveCap@newmichwill@ConvexFinance@CFrogE1@gggonecrypto@pray_eth@eth_Daily@WeekInEthNews更正。代币合同没有可用的管理功能,只能按照预先设定的程序工作(例如,充气计划不可更改,代币名称甚至不能更改,没有代币冻结,没有升级等)

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

RT: $CRV has a fascinating flywheel affect that makes it valuable to own and use.
Not only is there buy pressure, but protocols are allocating assets to bribe $CRV holders for exerting their governance rights.
Earn >50% APR & participate in the Curve Wars!
https://newsletter.banklesshq....

转发:$CRV有一种迷人的飞轮效应,使其拥有和使用都很有价值。
不仅存在购买压力,协议还在分配资产,以贿赂$CRV持有人行使其治理权。
赚取>;4月和4月的50%;参加曲线战!
https://newsletter.banklesshq....

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@nvy_0x @StittsHappening @ne1k0 @DefiSafety @CurveCap @newmichwill @ConvexFinance @CFrogE1 @gggonecrypto @pray_eth @ETH_Daily @WeekInEthNews Token contract is the one totally uncontrolled, even by the dao. Check the code though!

@nvy_0x@stittsCasting@ne1k0@DefiSafety@CurveCap@newmichwill@ConvexFinance@CFrogE1@gggonecrypto@pray_eth@eth_Daily@WeekInEthNews代币合同是完全不受控制的,即使是dao。检查代码!

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@nvy_0x @ne1k0 @DefiSafety @CurveCap @newmichwill @ConvexFinance @CFrogE1 @gggonecrypto @pray_eth @ETH_Daily @WeekInEthNews Ehhh how to contact you? DMs seem closed. Would love to reach also!

@nvy_0x@ne1k0@DefiSafety@CurveCap@newmichwill@ConvexFinance@CFrogE1@gggonecrypto@pray_eth@eth_Daily@WeekInEthNews Ehhh如何联系您?DMs似乎关闭了。我也很想去!

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

RT: Resources page with more detail on parameters for creating a Curve v2 Factory pool
https://resources.curve.fi/gui...

RT:参考资料页面,提供创建Curve v2 Factory池的参数的更多详细信息
https://resources.curve.fi/gui...

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@StittsHappening @nvy_0x @ne1k0 @DefiSafety @CurveCap @newmichwill @ConvexFinance @CFrogE1 @gggonecrypto @pray_eth @ETH_Daily @WeekInEthNews Indeed. Would love to understand better and make things safer

@Stittscoming@nvy_0x@ne1k0@DefiSafety@CurveCap@newmichwill@ConvexFinance@CFrogE1@gggonecrypto@pray_eth@eth_Daily@WeekInEthNews。希望能更好地理解,让事情变得更安全

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@CryptoSeq @curdiogenes @Jmon_salve @kelvinfractal @Platypusdefi We never had an ability for admins to pull customer funds, even if we wanted to. Yes, upgradeability would give that ability.
It's clear why you wanted that on. It's a huge regulatory risk, but after all, that's your choice.
But users need to be aware in advance!

@CryptoSeq@curdiogenes@Jmon_salve@kelvinfractal@Platypusdefi我们从未有过管理员拉客户资金的能力,即使我们想这么做。是的,升级能力会赋予这种能力。
很清楚你为什么要穿这个。这是一个巨大的监管风险,但毕竟,这是你的选择。
但是用户需要提前知道!

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@CurveCap @CFrogE1 @dydxprotocol @dydxfoundation DeFi helps DeFi 👀

@CurveCap@CFrogE1@dydxprotocol@dydxfoundation DeFi帮助DeFi👀

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@CryptoSeq @curdiogenes @Jmon_salve @kelvinfractal @Platypusdefi It's not about the validity of the decision, more about transparency and responsibility:
* Users need to be aware of that possibility in advance (!);
* Users need to be notified as soon as that happens;
* Team may need to deal with financial regulations.

@CryptoSeq@curdiogenes@Jmon_salve@kelvinfractal@Platypusdefi这与决策的有效性无关,更多的是关于透明度和责任:
*用户需要提前意识到这种可能性(!);
*用户需要尽快得到通知;
*团队可能需要处理财务法规。

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情