@kenlipartito @__philipn__ @j_g_allen Nobody remotely suggested stopping using. However, it is also not antivax to be honest about the changing conditions and reduced efficacy across the board.

@kenlipartito _; philipn __; j_; g_; allen没有人建议停止使用。然而，诚实地说病情的变化和整体疗效的降低也不是抗VAX的。

@DarkTrig @Bob_Wachter I've said this all along. If you don't care about reducing risk to other people, then do as you like. But I would suggest refraining from casting it as adversarial with "antimaskers". If you ignore risk to others you are also increasing risk to vulnerable people who aren't AMers.

@DarkTrig@Bob_Wachter我一直都这么说。如果你不在乎降低别人的风险，那就随心所欲吧。但我建议不要将其视为与“反间谍”的对手。如果你忽视了对他人的风险，你也增加了对非美国人的弱势群体的风险。

@DarkTrig @Bob_Wachter Safe in the real world is almost always a matter of degree. "Safe" vs. "unsafe" is usually false framing by someone with an agenda (or poor understanding).
Others w/n95s are more safe if you and others avoid spewing virus in the air. But w/no mandate, you are "allowed" to spew.

@DarkTrig@Bob_Wachter在现实世界中的安全性几乎总是一个程度的问题。“安全”与“不安全”通常是有议程（或理解力差）的人的错误框架。
如果你和其他人避免将病毒喷到空气中，其他带有N95的手机会更安全。但在没有授权的情况下，你是“被允许”吐的。

@DarkTrig @Bob_Wachter I've worn them for 10 hours at least probably longer, didn't find it hot. But again, comfort is subjective, people perceive it differently.
Having masks available to use is a good point, and better than no mask, true!
Then again, I'd suggest you plan on more wildfires.

@DarkTrig@Bob_Wachter我已经穿了至少10个小时了，可能更久了，没觉得热。但同样，舒适感是主观的，人们对它的看法不同。
有口罩可供使用是一个很好的观点，而且总比没有口罩好，真的！
再说一遍，我建议你计划更多的野火。

@DarkTrig @Bob_Wachter It's somewhat subjective too. If I'm going to wear an N95, I find the non-valved Aura more comfortable than the commonly available valved ones (mostly hard shell), and just as easy to breathe.
For me, don't see the point of going valved, but fit and subjective comfort vary.

@DarkTrig@Bob_Wachter这也有点主观。如果我要穿N95，我发现非带瓣的光环比常见的带瓣光环（大多为硬壳）更舒适，呼吸也同样容易。
对我来说，我看不出换瓣有什么意义，但合身度和主观舒适度各不相同。

@DarkTrig @Bob_Wachter Close range transmission matters too. Someone half a plane away much less likely to infect your seat mate than you are.

@DarkTrig@Bob_Wachter近距离传输也很重要。离你半个飞机远的人感染你室友的可能性比你小得多。

@DarkTrig @Bob_Wachter With 2% asymptomatic rate, on a mid sized plane with 100 passengers, there might be 2 infected, or 1 or 3 or even zero. If you are too, you're contributing substantially 0->1, 1->2, etc. Up to you if you care.

@DarkTrig@Bob_Wachter无症状率为2%，在一架有100名乘客的中型飞机上，可能有2人感染，或1人、3人甚至零人。如果你也是，那么你的贡献就相当于0->；1,1->；2等。如果你在乎的话，由你决定。

@AthenaisdeMont @ddiamond It's not two years. There was no federal mandate before 2021, and it was dropped in May 2021 only to be brought back in late July. 9 to 14 months depend on how you count. Your point is valid in general, Biden admin failed to make progress on non-emergency procedure, OSHA too.

@阿瑟奈斯德蒙特@ddiamond还不到两年。在2021之前没有联邦授权，它在2021年5月才被取消，只在七月下旬被收回。9到14个月取决于你如何计算。总的来说，你的观点是正确的，拜登行政部门在非紧急程序方面也没有取得进展。

@beepboopdurp @daveweigel @ddiamond I don't think these polls are specific to travelers but the public overall seems to support, if more narrowly than before.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/a...

@beepboopdurp@davewigel@ddiamond我不认为这些民调是针对旅行者的，但总体而言，公众似乎支持，尽管支持的范围比以前窄。
https://www.forbes.com/sites/a...

@becs_and @SixandLaura @notdred @j_g_allen This isn't a useful metric. Kids are LOWER risk of cancer too, and most every health condition. We don't downplay or dismiss the risk of childhood cancers.

@becs_和@SixandLaura@notdred@j_g_allen这不是一个有用的指标。儿童患癌症的风险也较低，而且几乎所有的健康状况都是如此。我们不会低估或忽视儿童癌症的风险。

@kenlipartito @__philipn__ @j_g_allen The statement made was correct.
The standard set prior to approval was 50% reduction in symptomatic disease. They don't meet that any more, particularly the two dose unboosted series (boosted may, but only for a relatively short time).

@肯利帕蒂托(kenlipartito)菲利浦(philipn)艾伦(kenlipartito)所作的声明是正确的。
批准前设定的标准是症状性疾病减少50%。他们不再满足这一要求，尤其是两剂非胶囊系列（5月增加，但仅在相对较短的时间内）。

@Michael59503746 @HughThunkIt @nohomelikeplace This was before the court ruling, although it's plausible it was expected.

@Michael59503746@HughThunkIt@Nohomelike这是在法院裁决之前，尽管这似乎是意料之中的。

@ladycowparsley @denise_dewald It's a mid term election which are much lower turnout. Biden/Harris aren't on the ballot, but people who do want them to stay in office but aren't enthusiastic about the direction of the party aren't going to bother.

@这是一场中期选举，投票率要低得多。拜登/哈里斯没有参加投票，但那些确实希望他们继续执政，但对该党的方向不感兴趣的人不会为此烦恼。

@bridget857 @denise_dewald If anything they likely undercount republican voters. That's consistently been the pattern for the last decade at least.

@bridget857@denise_dewald，如果他们有什么可能低估共和党选民的话。至少在过去十年里，这一直是一种模式。

@Art2Twtuser @Spudstar1 @MartinKulldorff For air travel yes.

@Art2Twtuser@Spudstar1@MartinKulldorff用于航空旅行是的。

@Spudstar1 @MartinKulldorff Sure. Transmission risk is cumulative over an extended period. It's not like when someone takes off the mask to eat this immediately infects the whole plane.
Also, vulnerable or cautious people who need to eat or drink can choose to do so when others are not eating and masked.

@Spudstar1@MartinKulldorff当然。传播风险在很长一段时间内是累积的。这不像是有人摘下口罩吃东西会立即感染整个飞机。
此外，需要进食或饮水的脆弱或谨慎的人可以在其他人不进食和戴口罩时选择进食或饮水。

@AShihipar @sleepyknave @Slate https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@AShipar@sleepyknave@Slatehttps://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@JessLooking8 @StrategyPhD @RRHDr @Delta Comfort is pretty subjective here. Some people are perfectly okay with N95, some absolutely hate them. May depend in part on which models fit an individual.

@JessLooking8@StrategyPhD@RRHDr@Delta Comfort在这里非常主观。有些人对N95非常满意，有些人则非常讨厌。可能部分取决于适合个人的型号。

@Redfisher1967 @Zazzzzzz4 @tmprowell @Delta @united @AmericanAir Not a minority at all.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/a...

@Redfisher1967@zazzzz4@tmprowell@Delta@united@AmericanAir根本不是少数民族。
https://www.forbes.com/sites/a...

@TitanFan_C_redo @ann_mcnitt @denise_dewald In theory you're right about lesser of two evils, but in practice it won't motivate former supporters who feel abandoned. They'll stay home and some (particularly if not highly attuned to politics) may even switch sides because "he fucked us, let's give the other side a chance".

@TitanFan_C_redo@ann_mcnitt@denise_dewald理论上，你对两个邪恶中较小的一个的看法是正确的，但在实践中，这不会激励那些感到被抛弃的前支持者。他们会待在家里，有些人（特别是如果不太了解政治的话）甚至可能会改变立场，因为“他干了我们，让我们给对方一个机会”。