用户 aeon(@ AeonCoin) 的最新消息

@GwylAnarchaidd @nanogenomic @MandateMasksNY As I said, the US more than carries its own weight, but a large majority of world population is outside the US. Apart from China (which leaves about 6.5 billion), the majority of the world has been infected. That's far more than US population.

@Gwylanarchidd@nanogenomic@MandateMasksNY正如我所说,美国不仅承载着自己的重量,但世界人口的绝大多数都在美国之外。除了中国(剩下约65亿人),世界上大多数地区都受到感染。这远远超过美国人口。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@GwylAnarchaidd @nanogenomic @MandateMasksNY WHO says that global deaths are 15 million. US is about 1 million (a bit more due to undercounting, but not 2 million)

@Gwylanarchidd@nanogenomic@MandateMasksNY说,全球死亡人数为1500万。美国约为100万(由于计算不足,略多一些,但不是200万)

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@GwylAnarchaidd @nanogenomic @MandateMasksNY US more than carries its own weight but by sheer population this is less likely than not.

@Gwylanarchidd@nanogenomic@MandateMasksNY-US的体重超过了自身体重,但就其数量而言,这种可能性要小得多。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DrEricDing @Delta @WUTangKids Did they consult even with any high school biology student, who would know better?

@他们甚至和任何一个高中生物学生商量过,谁会知道得更清楚呢?

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@KrauthBen @sqL_handLe @CT_Bergstrom It's a choice made within the context of a mandate.
a. Choose between better mask and worse mask
b. Choose between better mask and no mask
Not the same. Look at any stock photo of people wearing masks on a plane. Many not cloth.

@KrauthBen@sqL_handLe@CT_Bergstrom这是在授权范围内做出的选择。
a、 在更好的面膜和更差的面膜之间选择
b、 在更好的面膜和没有面膜之间选择
不一样。看看所有在飞机上戴口罩的人的照片。很多不是布料。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@KrauthBen @sqL_handLe @CT_Bergstrom You're overly focused on the plane in flight itself, ignoring ground time, airports, shuttle busses, local transit, etc.
And it's not a "cloth mask mandate". It's a mask mandate. When required to wear any mask, many wear something better than a cloth mask (at least surgical).

@KrauthBen@sqL_handLe@CT_Bergstrom你过度关注飞行中的飞机本身,忽略了地面时间、机场、穿梭巴士、当地交通等。
而且这不是“布面任务”。这是一个面具任务。当需要戴口罩时,许多人会戴上比布口罩更好的口罩(至少是外科口罩)。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@KrauthBen @sqL_handLe @CT_Bergstrom Small mutations yes, but none of the major distinct variants with large sets of mutations do that.

@KrauthBen@sqL_handLe@CT_Bergstrom小突变是的,但没有一个具有大突变集的主要不同变体能做到这一点。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@spielblog @ArrogantMonkey @hilzoy @mattyglesias @nycsouthpaw You're mistaken. 40% of covid deaths in the US in January were vaccinated, which is 24k (total 60k). That's an average flu season just in that one month. It's really not even close.

@spielblog@ArrogantMonkey@hilzoy@mattyglesias@nycsouthpaw你错了。美国1月份新冠肺炎死亡病例中有40%接种了疫苗,即24k例(总计60k例)。这是一个月内的平均流感季节。这真的不是很近。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JG80240227 @michaelmina_lab Most people don't need to file a claim. Can pick up free tests at participating pharmacy with insurance card. But, many don't know this, and even many pharmacies don't know how to handle the transaction. Could absolutely be better.
Giving out at the airport does remove obstacles

@JG80240227@michaelmina_实验室大多数人不需要提交索赔。可以使用保险卡在参与药房接受免费测试。但是,许多人不知道这一点,甚至许多药店也不知道如何处理交易。绝对可以更好。
在机场发放确实可以消除障碍

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Michael59503746 @HughThunkIt @nohomelikeplace No evidence for that.
https://dailycaller.com/2022/0...

@Michael9503746@HughThunkIt@nohomelike没有证据证明这一点。
https://dailycaller.com/2022/0...

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JG80240227 @michaelmina_lab Very few people are going to voluntarily turn around and go home was my point. (Though I guess there are some situations where they would, such as the purpose of the trip being to visit a highly vulnerable family member.)
Some MIGHT wear an N95 if positive.
I see stigma issues

@JG80240227@michaelmina_实验室我的观点是,很少有人会自愿转身回家。(尽管我猜在某些情况下,他们可能会这样做,比如旅行的目的是探望一位非常脆弱的家庭成员。)
如果阳性,有些人可能会佩戴N95。
我看到了耻辱问题

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@TheAngryEpi Actually at green they don't even suggest that.

@Angryepi实际上在green,他们甚至没有这样建议。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@TheAngryEpi @CDCgov It started May 13, 2021.

@ TangangyiPi @ CDCGOV从2021年5月13日开始。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@michaelmina_lab Slightly better chance for that at least. I don't know what level of voluntary compliance is likely under those conditions.

@michaelmina_实验室至少有更好的机会。我不知道在这种情况下,自愿遵守的程度有多高。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@brailemom @michaelmina_lab Hell no, but TPTB don't ask me for my opinion on covid policy.

@brailemom@michaelmina_lab绝对不会,但TPTB不会征求我对新冠病毒政策的意见。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Fortuna89451997 @ibrake4ants @DanaGField @michaelmina_lab Most insurers have online and/or physical pharmacy partner where you can get them without needing to do reimbursement. They're strongly incentivized to do so by the program rules.

@Fortuna89451997@ibrake4ants@DanaGField@michaelmina_lab大多数保险公司都有在线和/或实体药房合作伙伴,您无需报销即可获得这些服务。项目规则强烈激励他们这么做。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@brailemom @michaelmina_lab Symptomatic doesn't necessarily mean highly contagious.

@brailemom@michaelmina_实验室有症状并不一定意味着高度传染性。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@michaelmina_lab Very few people are willing to voluntarily disrupt their travel by the time they've already arrived at the airport. They won't take the test, or will take it but quietly throw away the positive test because they "feel fine".

@michaelmina_实验室很少有人愿意在抵达机场之前自愿中断旅行。他们不会接受测试,或者会接受测试,但会悄悄地扔掉阳性测试,因为他们“感觉很好”。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@GeorgeS33388337 @LarryDeLuca @michaelmina_lab @Danny_Funaro Reduction doesn't mean zero risk. People die with seat belts on all the time. Wear a seat belt anyway.

@GeorgeS33388337@LarryDeLuca@michaelmina_lab@Danny_Funaro减少并不意味着零风险。人们总是系着安全带死去。无论如何都要系安全带。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DanaGField @yayitswee @ibrake4ants @michaelmina_lab If you can get through grad school you can figure it out once. It's usually easy.

@DanaGField@yayitswee@ibrake4ants@michaelmina_实验室如果你能通过研究生院,你就可以搞清楚一次。这通常很容易。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情