用户 aeon(@ AeonCoin) 的最新消息

@IMHO1969 @LawrenceGostin @DailyBeast_ Yes, in much smaller numbers. Typically people don't even get the flu more often than every 5-10 years, less if taking care to avoid it. Covid is different from the flu.

@IMHO1969@LawrenceGostin@DailyBeast_uu是的,数量少得多。通常情况下,人们感染流感的频率甚至不会超过每5-10年一次,如果小心避免的话,会更少。新冠病毒不同于流感。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@IMHO1969 @LawrenceGostin @DailyBeast_ It's not the flu (in fact multiples higher in impact), and unless you expect the pandemic to continue forever with a high level of illness and death, no it won't be forever. It is still happening now.

@IMHO1969@LawrenceGostin@DailyBeast_uu这不是流感(事实上,其影响倍数更高),除非你预计大流行将永远持续,并伴随着高水平的疾病和死亡,否则它不会永远持续下去。现在仍在发生。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@michaelmina_lab @sharonNYT "We have seen false positives from throat swabs based on the acidity of recent food and beverage consumed"
How hard is it to tell people not to do the test for 30 minutes after eating or drinking?

@michaelmina_lab@sharonNYT“根据最近食用的食物和饮料的酸度,我们从咽拭子中发现了假阳性。”
告诉人们在饮食后30分钟内不要做测试有多难?

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@IMHO1969 @LawrenceGostin @DailyBeast_ High risk people can completely avoid movie theaters (though whether it is ethical to expect them to indefinitely is another question), they often can't avoid travel.

@IMHO1969@LawrenceGostin@DailyBeast_u高危人群可以完全避免去电影院(尽管期待他们无限期地去电影院是否合乎道德是另一个问题),他们通常无法避免旅行。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@FinchTH @james1chas3 @JReinerMD I'm not sure they're that competent.

@FinchTH@james1chas3@jrinermd我不确定他们是否有能力。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@james1chas3 @JReinerMD If you want to go full on tin foil, knowing the ruling was coming, and knowing the judge, one might imagine that the two week extension was done for this purpose.

@james1chas3@JReinerMD如果你想充分利用锡箔纸,知道判决即将到来,也知道法官,你可以想象延长两周就是为了这个目的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@SJonNantucket @PeterHotez @JReinerMD That's not correct, even anti-mask ruling says this, it just says that it didn't have the power to make THIS rule. The CDC has power to make rules.

@SJonNantucket@PeterHotez@JReinerMD这是不正确的,就连反面具裁决也这么说,它只是说它没有权力制定这条规则。疾控中心有权制定规则。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@jklmd123 T*p and M*l tag team

@jklmd123 T*p和M*l标签团队

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@justthefacts85 They had help.

@事实上他们得到了帮助。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@FleischmanSteve @kvongoeler @countdown2march @mehdirhasan And yes, the majority dying vaccinated are vulnerable. But this is true of unvaccinated as well!
The vast majority of people who get covid, whether vaccinated or not, don't die, if you are concerned about deaths, you are mostly concerned about vulnerable people, either way.

@FleischmanSteve@kvongoeler@countdown2march@mehdirhasan是的,大多数接种疫苗的垂死者都很脆弱。但未接种疫苗也是如此!
绝大多数感染新冠病毒的人,无论是否接种疫苗,都不会死亡。如果你担心死亡,那么不管怎样,你主要关心的是弱势人群。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@FleischmanSteve @kvongoeler @countdown2march @mehdirhasan No one here is saying that vaccines don't work. We're saying it is wrong to claim that the vast majority dying are unvaccinated.
There are enough vaccinated people dying to still be important, unless you think that vulnerable people are disposable.

@FleischmanSteve@kvongoeler@countdown2march@mehdirhasan这里没有人说疫苗不起作用。我们说,声称绝大多数死亡者没有接种疫苗是错误的。
有足够多接种疫苗的人死亡,这仍然很重要,除非你认为易受伤害的人是一次性的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@FleischmanSteve @kvongoeler @countdown2march @mehdirhasan Right. When you have 40% of the deaths coming from 66% of the population, that's still a lot. It means 60% coming from 34% which is not even 2x overrepresented.

@FleischmanSteve@kvongoeler@countdown2march@mehdirhasan Right。当你有40%的死亡来自66%的人口时,这仍然是很多。这意味着60%的人来自34%的人,这一比例甚至不超过2倍。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@FleischmanSteve @kvongoeler @countdown2march @mehdirhasan It's not THAT much larger. Some countries don't, but the US has plenty of unvaccinated people. About twice as many vaccinated as unvaccinated.

@FleischmanSteve@kvongoeler@countdown2march@mehdirhasan它并没有那么大。有些国家没有,但美国有很多未接种疫苗的人。接种疫苗的人数大约是未接种的两倍。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@LaTriSarahtops @LongDesertTrain @DFisman @nytimes I can also see the sequence happening as a diminution of concern. "It happened to me [and I survived, I'm okay, etc.] so why should I worry about it happening to you?"

@LaTriSarahtops@LongDesertTrain@DFisman@nytimes我也可以把这一系列事件看作是一种担忧的减少。“这件事发生在我身上[我活了下来,我很好,等等],所以我为什么要担心它发生在你身上?”

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@dedrie77 @xuchuanmei @Kenneth33071904 @AnnieOddly @carolbinks @DrAimeeGrant You can buy smaller filters, for example 12x12. The problem is finding a 12x12 box fan. Not as common as the 20x20 ones. People have rigged things up with round fans and extra cardboard.

@dedrie77@xuchuanmei@Kenneth33071904@Annieodly@carolbinks@DraimeGrant您可以购买更小的过滤器,例如12x12。问题是找到一个12x12机箱风扇。不像20x20那样常见。人们用圆扇子和额外的纸板把东西装好。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@dedrie77 @Kenneth33071904 @AnnieOddly @carolbinks @DrAimeeGrant CR is not technically a HEPA filter. It uses MERV 13 filters which only filter 60% of the most unfilterable particles. It makes up for it by high airflow (much higher than typical HEPA filter boxes) and multiple passes (60% twice is 91%, and so on).

@dedrie77@Kenneth33071904@Annieodly@carolbinks@DraimeGrant CR严格来说不是高效空气过滤器。它使用MERV 13过滤器,只过滤60%最不可过滤的颗粒。它通过高气流(远高于典型的HEPA过滤箱)和多通道(60%两次为91%等)来弥补。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@AbraarKaran Doing what politicians do best, kicking the can past the next election.

@阿布拉卡兰在做政客们最擅长的事情,在下一次选举中获胜。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@LeanaKnows This account briefly convinces me it is the real LW almost every single time.

@LeanaKnows这个故事让我相信它几乎每次都是真实的LW。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@alexmeshkin Alpha was during a time of increasing immunity. Now is decreasing.

@阿列克斯金·阿尔法处于免疫力增强时期。现在正在减少。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@AbraarKaran Democrats want to run in 2022 on beating covid. If they didn't actually beat it, just make shit up.

@AbraarKaran民主党人希望在2022年击败新冠病毒。如果他们没有真的打败它,那就胡编乱造吧。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情