@james1chas3 @getupgetfree "Fuck it" is not optimal under any circumstances IMO, but you do you do.
Possibly it might make sense to adjust away from 99.99 percentile, that's less clear.
@james1chas3@getupgetfree“去他妈的”在任何情况下都不是最优的，但你确实是。
也许调整99.99%是有意义的，这一点不太清楚。
@james1chas3 @getupgetfree I'm not sure it makes sense. Things may never get better but your life may still be better adapting to that reality without accumulated organ damage.
@james1chas3@getupgetfree我不确定这是否有意义。事情可能永远不会变得更好，但你的生活可能会更好地适应现实，而不会累积器官损伤。
@justthefacts85 @justaneighsayer @BernieDogs4 @CovidDataReport @perdidostschool @MeetJess @danaparish @MLS_Dave @LazarusLong13 @LauraMiers It's unclear, but I would say from reading that she probably got covid during the big Omicron wave, and maybe the whole family did.
If motivated, I'd find all of her media appearances and look for a week-long gap, which probably coincides with being symptomatic.
@JustTheFact85@justaneighsayer@BernieDogs4@CovidDataReport@perdidostschool@MeetJess@danaparish@MLS_Dave@LazarusLong13@LauraMiers目前尚不清楚，但我从阅读中可以看出，她可能在Omicron大浪潮中感染了新冠病毒，也许整个家庭都感染了。
如果受到激励，我会找到她所有的媒体露面，寻找一周的间隔，这可能与症状相符。
@ArchiveAsshole @__psn @RealSexyCyborg @luisbruno Pretty useless if the most vulnerable won't take it. That's the main issue, not vaccine type.
@ArchiveAshole@_psn@RealSexyCyborg@luisbruno如果最脆弱的人不接受它，那它就毫无用处了。这是主要问题，而不是疫苗类型。
@LazarusLong13 @BernieDogs4 Even if we assume, hypothetically, that the lobbied change was reasonable and necessary policymaking due to supply constraints (and not just a corporate handout), WHY WAS IT NOT REVERSED LATER?
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@LazarusLong13 @tarahaelle Likewise, what is the process that downgrades respirator guidance in order to manage supply chains, but does not reverse that downgrade when supplies are ample?
发表时间：4年前 作者：aeon @AeonCoin@LazarusLong13@BernieDogs4即使我们假设，由于供应限制（而不仅仅是企业施舍），游说的变化是合理和必要的决策，为什么后来没有逆转呢？
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@LazarusLong13@tarahaelle同样，为了管理供应链，降低呼吸机指导的过程是什么，但在供应充足时不会逆转这种降低？
@LazarusLong13 @tarahaelle Likewise, what is the process that downgrades respirator guidance in order to manage supply chains, but does not reverse that downgrade when supplies are ample?
@LazarusLong13@tarahaelle同样，为了管理供应链，降低呼吸机指导的过程是什么，但在供应充足时不会逆转这种降低？
@LazarusLong13 @tarahaelle Lack of reversing is notable. What is the process that supports reducing isolation in order to avoid "drain(ing) society of their very critical workers" (Fauci) but doesn't reverse that when incidence declines enough that viability of critical workforce is no longer at stake?
@LazarusLong13@tarahaelle缺乏倒车是值得注意的。什么样的过程支持减少隔离，以避免“耗尽社会中非常关键的员工”（Fauci），但当发病率下降到足以使关键员工的生存能力不再受到威胁时，这一过程不会逆转？
@farid__jalali @macroliter Inflating success also encourages hesitancy.
@farid__jalali@Macroll通胀的成功也鼓励了犹豫不决。
@LazarusLong13 https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@AbraarKaran Not only government but also public and private institutions such as hospitals, many of which lobbied against airborne guidance when they had not prepared adequate stockpiles of PPE and weren't able to get it (and/or weren't willing to pay for it)
https://revealnews.org/article... https://t.co/uqRzPBd9qx
@拉扎鲁斯隆13https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@AbraarKaran不仅包括政府机构，还包括医院等公共和私人机构，其中许多机构在没有准备足够的PPE储备且无法获得PPE（和/或不愿意支付费用）时游说反对空中指导
https://revealnews.org/article... https://t.co/uqRzPBd9qx
@Gab_H_R So he's saying things are going to get worse?
@Gab_H__R所以他说情况会变得更糟？
@HughThunkIt @amethystarlight @chargrille Still have (some) wastewater for now, and it supports the idea of abandonment of testing hiding a surge.
https://twitter.com/AbraarKara...
Wastewater surveillance versus detected/reported cases
Ignoring cases is a foolish strategy https://t.co/2RL8rCCFi6
@HughThunkIt@amethystarlight@Chargrill目前仍有（一些）废水，它支持放弃测试以掩盖激增的想法。
https://twitter.com/AbraarKara...
废水监测与检测/报告病例
忽视案件是愚蠢的策略https://t.co/2RL8rCCFi6
@HughThunkIt @amethystarlight @chargrille Brilliant.
@HughThunkIt@amethystallight@chargrill辉煌。
@HughThunkIt @amethystarlight @chargrille During moderate case periods "overall", that's certainly true. During peaks, particularly Omicron there was never anywhere near enough testing. Positivity rate peaked >25%.
@HughThunkIt@amethystarlight@chargrill在中度病例期间“总体上”，这当然是真的。在峰值期间，尤其是Omicron，从未进行过足够的测试。阳性率达到峰值>；25%.
@HughThunkIt @amethystarlight @chargrille This is true, but the undercount was massive on previous waves too, particularly near peaks.
@HughThunkIt@amethystarlight@chargrill这是真的，但在之前的几次浪潮中，特别是在山峰附近，数量不足的情况也很严重。
@DailyJLee @DrLeanaWen @Dr2NisreenAlwan For example, part of the premise of this return to "pre-pandemic normal" is availability of effective therapeutics. BUT IT WASN'T NORMAL IN 2019 TO SCRAMBLE TO GET A LIFE SAVING MEDICINE WITHIN 5 DAYS.
I don't know what that is exactly, but it is NOT "pre-pandemic normal"
@例如，DailyJLee@DrLeanaWen@Dr2NisreenAlwan恢复“大流行前正常”的部分前提是有效疗法的可用性。但在2019年，争先恐后地在5天内拿到救命药是不正常的。
我不知道这到底是什么，但这不是“大流行前的正常情况”
@DailyJLee @DrLeanaWen @Dr2NisreenAlwan Without elimination or at least tight control, going to "pre-pandemic normal" is such an absurd expectation and essentially a fraudulent promise being sold.
The actual reality is that conditions changed. You can't go backwards except by magical thinking.
@DailyJLee@DrLeanaWen@Dr2NisreenAlwan如果不消除或至少严格控制，走向“大流行前正常”是一种荒谬的期望，本质上是一种虚假的承诺。
实际情况是，情况发生了变化。除非有魔法思维，否则你不能倒退。
@wsbgnl Would reaching, say, 1/2 the height of the delta or Omicron surge, be "not a surge"?
@wsbgnl是否会达到（比如）三角洲或奥米克龙浪涌高度的1/2，即“不是浪涌”？
@slendrmeans @kjhealy 1. Depends what you mean by "low".
Per the risk ratio chart, appears to be about 1/10 of what it would be if unvaxed. Whether that is "low" very much depends on context.
@slendr的意思是@kjhealy 1。这取决于你所说的“低”是什么意思。
根据风险比率表，这一比例似乎约为未征税情况下的1/10。这是否“低”在很大程度上取决于上下文。
@love2getvented @RadCentrism Sounds self correcting.
@love2getvented@RadCentrism听起来是自我修正的。