@RadCentrism There has been a lot of influence from HIV. Some of it helpful, a lot of it not.

@Radcentralism受HIV的影响很大。有些有用，但很多没有。

@joelewi53642335 @JReinerMD @dr_kkjetelina @VickiShanmugam Or just plain reduced mask usage. IHME composite mask poll shows plummeting usage since January regardless of the mandate https://t.co/iEflwkjYMu

@joelewi53642335@JReinerMD@dr_kkjetelina@VickiShanmugam或干脆减少面膜使用量。IHME复合口罩民意调查显示，自1月份以来，无论授权如何，口罩的使用量都大幅下降https://t.co/iEflwkjYMu

@BernieDogs4 @CassandraTSLAQ Pretty much. And to be clear both that memo and the reporting about focus groups done by Gov Murphy are pretty junk science. I don't think it's clearly wrong but it seems to have taken on a character of groupthink among Dem leaders.

@BernieDogs4@CassandraTSLAQ差不多。要清楚的是，这份备忘录和墨菲州长关于焦点小组的报道都是垃圾科学。我不认为这显然是错误的，但它似乎在Dem领导人中呈现出了群体思维的特点。

@joelewi53642335 @JReinerMD @dr_kkjetelina @VickiShanmugam Scotland would be consistent with both this science and: (a) more transmission in places where people not using masks, or (b) increased contacts due to other behavior change apart from mask usage.

@joelewi53642335@jrienermd@dr_kkjetelina@VickiShanmugam Scotland将与这一科学和（a）在人们不使用口罩的地方传播更多，或（b）由于除使用口罩外的其他行为改变而增加接触。

@joelewi53642335 @JReinerMD @dr_kkjetelina @VickiShanmugam This isn't even remotely some random on youtube. It's a group leader from the Max Planck Institute applying his peer reviewed mask and transmission physics research to a novel variant.

@joelewi53642335@jrinermd@dr_kkjetelina@VickiShanmugam这在youtube上甚至都不是随机的。这是来自马克斯·普朗克研究所的一位小组负责人将他的同行评议的口罩和传输物理研究应用于一种新的变体。

@CassandraTSLAQ @BernieDogs4 Yes, if you were running a primary, that's what you don't focus on.

@CassandraTSLAQ@BernieDogs4是的，如果你在进行初选，那就是你不关注的。

@joelewi53642335 @JReinerMD @dr_kkjetelina @VickiShanmugam That being said, here's a peer-reviewed model being re-applied to Omicron parameters and showing that masks (including surgical) work BETTER than with delta (due to differences in droplet size from URT vs. LRT).
https://twitter.com/BagheriMos...

@joelewi53642335@JReinerMD@dr_kkjetelina@VickiShanmugam，也就是说，这是一个重新应用于Omicron参数的同行评审模型，表明口罩（包括外科口罩）比delta口罩效果更好（因为URT和LRT的雾滴大小不同）。
https://twitter.com/BagheriMos...

@joelewi53642335 @JReinerMD @dr_kkjetelina @VickiShanmugam If you had any idea what you were talking about you'd realize that's an impossibility b/c peer review publication takes > couple of months. Also, there are more variants out there besides BA.2. If you need specific science for every variant, you have nothing. Must generalize.

@joelewi53642335@jrinermd@dr_kkjetelina@VickiShanmugam如果你知道你在说什么，你会意识到这是b/c同行评议出版物无法接受的>；几个月。此外，除了BA，还有更多的变种。2.如果你需要针对每一种变体的特定科学，你什么都没有。必须概括。

@joelewi53642335 @JReinerMD @dr_kkjetelina @VickiShanmugam Time and dosage matter. Part-time masking still reduces risk. Also, more people potentially exposed to infectious carrier on plane walking around vs sitting in one place.

@joelewi53642335@JReinerMD@dr_kkjetelina@VickiShanmugam时间和剂量问题。兼职掩蔽仍然可以降低风险。此外，在飞机上四处走动而不是坐在一个地方可能接触传染性携带者的人更多。

@JReinerMD @dr_kkjetelina @VickiShanmugam https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@JReinerMD@dr_kkjetelina@VickiShanmugamhttps://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@alex_lanstein @jeremyfaust Minimal contact tracing, often none at all.

@alex_lanstein@JeremyFast最小联系人追踪，通常根本没有。

@ryan_landay Colds do that right?

@ryan_landay感冒对吗？

@BernieDogs4 Polls are a bit ambiguous. Look at the key independent possibly swing voters. They're right around 50-50 and on one side or the other depending on the wording of the question.
Dem establishment bought into the theory that anti-covid is net loser. Maybe wrong but not clearly so.

@BernieDogs4民调有点模棱两可。看看关键的独立选民。根据问题的措辞，他们的观点大致在50-50之间，并且在一边或另一边。
Dem的建立相信了抗新冠病毒是净输家的理论。也许是错的，但不是很明显。

@davidsirota Pretty much defines the big tent.

@戴维斯罗塔几乎定义了大帐篷。

@sri_srikrishna @ee_kelsey @DavidElfstrom @Air99_LLC Front shroud feeding into a hose/helmet i.e. PAPR.? 😉

@sri_srikrishna@ee_kelsey@DavidElfstrom@Air99_LLC前围板，向软管/头盔馈电，即PAPR。？😉

@ee_kelsey @sri_srikrishna @DavidElfstrom @Air99_LLC Hmm, if aim is to slow down velocity, maybe run fan on lower speed?

@ee_kelsey@sri_srikrishna@DavidElfstrom@Air99_LLC-Hmm，如果目的是降低速度，也许可以让风扇以更低的速度运转？

@TerrorIncognita @DavidElfstrom @ariccio Box fan on speed 1 or 2 is not particularly loud and may still perform better than a small commercial air cleaner. For a one-filter build maybe consider 20x20x4.

@TerrorIncognita@DavidElfstrom@Aricio Box风扇在速度1或2上的声音不是特别大，可能仍比小型商用空气滤清器性能更好。对于一个过滤器构建可能考虑20x20x4。

@DavidElfstrom Filter on outlet has the disadvantage of the fan getting dirty. I might also put a very light dust filter (cloth or open cell foam) on the inlet.

@出口处的DavidElfstrom过滤器存在风扇变脏的缺点。我也可以在进气口放一个非常轻的灰尘过滤器（布或开孔泡沫）。

@Misha37067244 @NjbBari3 @HZiauddeen Haha, maybe. Exterior of all food packaging was cleaned and disinfected in a food safe way, and hands washed frequently when handling unwashed food (precautionary principle not being sure about risk of fomites at the time). But...mistakes happen.

@Misha37067244@NjbBari3@HZiauddeen哈哈，也许吧。所有食品包装的外部都以食品安全的方式进行了清洁和消毒，在处理未清洗的食品时经常洗手（当时的预防原则是不确定是否存在磷中毒的风险）。但是错误总会发生。

@jmcrookston @NjbBari3 @HZiauddeen Yes I saw the other reply. Is possible.

@jmcrookston@NjbBari3@HZiauddeen是的，我看到了另一个回复。这是可能的。