@GidMK @Marco_Piani @zorinaq @elonmusk I mean, you keep bringing up the SPECIFIC case of targeted harassment, but then propose a remedy that (unlike e.g. restraining orders) isn't in any way limited to harassment, and has CLEAR harms that @zorinaq alluded to. There must be better solutions.
@GidMK@Marco_Piani@zorinaq@elonmusk我的意思是，你一直在提出针对性骚扰的具体案例，但随后提出了一种补救措施（与限制令不同），这种补救措施在任何方面都不局限于骚扰，并且具有@zorinaq暗示的明显危害。必须有更好的解决方案。
@GidMK @Marco_Piani @zorinaq @elonmusk If an individual is engaging with an audience of 10k+, they're not acting in the role of an individual. Quiet dinner with a few friends or mowing the lawn at home, sure.
@GidMK@Marco_Piani@zorinaq@elonmusk如果一个人与10k+观众互动，他们就不是在扮演一个人的角色。和几个朋友安静地共进晚餐，或者在家修剪草坪，当然。
@GidMK @Marco_Piani @zorinaq @elonmusk You can't prevent people from protesting or counterprotesting against you as a public figure in a public square in most free societies.
Legal recourse requires process and adjudication, not unilaterally pushing a button.
@GidMK@Marco_Piani@zorinaq@elonmusk在大多数自由社会，你无法阻止人们在公共广场上抗议或反对你作为公众人物。
法律追索权需要过程和裁决，而不是单方面按下按钮。
@GidMK @Marco_Piani @zorinaq @elonmusk You can walk away, but by doing so you essentially exit the public square. Restraining order is via a legal process where you demonstrate the harassment to a neutral party, not unilaterally by pushing a button.
@GidMK@Marco_Piani@zorinaq@elonmusk你可以离开，但这样你基本上就离开了公共广场。禁止令是通过法律程序向中立方展示骚扰行为，而不是单方面按下按钮。
@GidMK @Marco_Piani @zorinaq @elonmusk (Particularly if a public figure and the so-called "harassment" may actually BE legitimate protest.)
Twitter is designed and used by people to have large audiences, essentially making themselves public figures. It isn't Facebook (ex. groups) where it's only your friends.
@GidMK@Marco_Piani@zorinaq@elonmusk（特别是如果公众人物和所谓的“骚扰”实际上可能是合法抗议的话）
推特的设计和使用是为了吸引大量的受众，基本上是为了让自己成为公众人物。这不是Facebook（前群组），那里只有你的朋友。
@GidMK @Marco_Piani @zorinaq @elonmusk That's such a narrow subset of reasons people block, seems better addressed through an abuse process, as is the case offline. You don't blanket get to exclude people from your presence without a significant legal process.
@GidMK@Marco_Piani@zorinaq@elonmusk这是人们阻止的一小部分原因，似乎最好通过虐待过程来解决，就像离线情况一样。在没有重大法律程序的情况下，你无法将他人排除在你的面前。
@GidMK @Marco_Piani @zorinaq @elonmusk And further, blocking doesn't stop someone from threatening you. They can continue to make threats that don't happen to be replies.
@GidMK@Marco_Piani@zorinaq@elonmusk，更进一步，封锁并不能阻止有人威胁你。他们可以继续制造威胁，而这些威胁恰好不是回应。
@GidMK @Marco_Piani @zorinaq @elonmusk Threatening is where the line gets crossed whether online or not. But blocking is a very different instrument, and I'd guess that 99%+ of blocks are not credible threats, probably not even threats at all.
@GidMK@Marco_Piani@zorinaq@elonmusk威胁是无论在线与否的底线。但封锁是一种完全不同的手段，我猜99%以上的封锁都不是可信的威胁，甚至可能根本不是威胁。
@trendless @Kenneth33071904 Dependent on breeze.
@无趋势@Kenneth33071904依赖微风。
@Marco_Piani @zorinaq @GidMK @elonmusk Insult yes. Lie about you, might be defamation.
I mean what can you do about insults? You can take it or leave, right?
@Marco_Piani@zorinaq@GidMK@elonmusk是的。对你撒谎，可能是诽谤。
我是说你能对侮辱做些什么？你要么接受要么离开，对吧？
@Marco_Piani @zorinaq @GidMK @elonmusk I don't think you have any right to a safe zone (from insults) in a public square.
@Marco_Piani@zorinaq@GidMK@elonmusk我认为你无权在公共广场上进入安全区（免受侮辱）。
@Marco_Piani @zorinaq @GidMK @elonmusk Setting aside illegality fo graffiti aspect, I don't think you have standing to complain. Someone could stand behind you or next to you with insulting signs for example. That's the nature of a pubic square.
@Marco_Piani@zorinaq@GidMK@elonmusk抛开涂鸦方面的违法性不谈，我认为你没有资格抱怨。例如，有人可能站在你身后或你旁边，用侮辱性的手势。这就是公共广场的本质。
@dianemann0613 @quality_nguyen @denise_dewald There may be, but need not be. You're underestimating the power of tribalism.
@dianemann0613@quality_nguyen@denise_dewald可能有，但不一定有。你低估了部落主义的力量。
@Marco_Piani @zorinaq @GidMK @elonmusk Supposedly it's a public square. If it were a house, there would be no issue of free speech at all.
@Marco_Piani@zorinaq@GidMK@elonmusk据说这是一个公共广场。如果它是一座房子，就根本没有言论自由的问题。
@myrabatchelder @PublicHealth Covid, it's response, and it's aftermath have undone 50 years of health improvements, at least. I guess that leaves the first 100 years of progress to self-congratulate over.
@MyraBatcheld@PublicHealth-Covid，它的回应，以及它的后果，至少破坏了50年来的健康改善。我想，这就让我们对前100年的进步感到庆幸。
@IAMChrisEdward @wsbgnl It's 30% of population. The 45% is % of double vaxed who also have booster.
@IAMChrisEdward@wsbgnl这是人口的30%。45%的人是有助推器的双VAX患者。
@wsbgnl The principle is correct, but this graphic is very much not to scale. It is extremely deceptive.
@wsbgnl原理是正确的，但这张图很难缩放。这是非常具有欺骗性的。