用户 aeon(@ AeonCoin) 的最新消息

@MetalRabbit13 @PalmerReport @MuellerSheWrote It's a cash deal. Once the deal goes through Twitter stockholders have no stake in what happens later.

@MetalRabbit13@PalmerReport@MuellerSheWrote这是一笔现金交易。一旦交易通过,推特的股东们就不再关心以后会发生什么。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@oni_blackstock Same level of deaths too, BTW

@顺便说一句,奥尼乌黑市的死亡率也一样

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@TellMeNoLiesPls @AbundantLandUse @driusan @farid__jalali Headline writers in the UK have obviously never heard of Alabama.

@TellMeNoLiesPls@AbundantLandUse@driusan@farid__jalali英国的标题作家显然从未听说过阿拉巴马州。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@AGoldsmithEsq @justthefacts85 @VP The high risk factor known as "being a VIP"

@AGoldsmithEsq@justthefact85@VP被称为“成为VIP”的高风险因素

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@MullingMueller @ZekeJMiller @DrEricDing I'm not SURE. There haven't been any pre-existing conditions reported, I think. But she might well be "overweight" (BMI 25+) and/or have asthma. Those are very common, along with the others.

@MullingMueller@ZekeJMiller@Drericing我不确定。我想,目前还没有任何先例报告。但她很可能“超重”(BMI 25+)和/或患有哮喘。这些都很常见,其他的也很常见。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@MullingMueller @ZekeJMiller @DrEricDing The list of pre-existing conditions is so broad it covers almost everyone.

@MullingMueller@ZekeJMiller@drericing预先存在的条件的列表非常广泛,几乎涵盖了所有人。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Rook_SpartyOn @ZekeJMiller @MaddowBlog That's not a requirement. The criteria are based on pre-existing risk factors, not severity of symptoms. Requirement to start treatment early. If waiting for symptoms to develop and progress may be too late.

@Rook_SpartyOn@ZekeJMiller@MaddowBlog这不是要求。这些标准基于预先存在的风险因素,而不是症状的严重程度。要求尽早开始治疗。如果等待症状发展和进展可能为时已晚。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@mskathleenquinn @TheAngryEpi @myrabatchelder @NewsHour @JudyWoodruff That piece is an utter train wreck. I can't even count the clear mistakes and falsehoods. Or, I could, but I'm not going to bother. I'll note though that the concepts of waning immunity and immune evasion aren't even mentioned. It's pure herd immunity modeling nonsense.

@Kathleenquinn@TheAngryEpi@Myrabatcheld@NewsHour@JudyWoodruff女士:那是一个彻头彻尾的火车残骸。我甚至数不清那些明显的错误和谬误。或者,我可以,但我不想麻烦了。不过我要指出的是,免疫减弱和免疫逃避的概念甚至没有被提及。这纯粹是胡说八道。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@TheAngryEpi @myrabatchelder @NewsHour @JudyWoodruff Yeah it makes no sense, pure political spin I guess.

@Angryepi@Myrabatcheld@NewsHour@JudyWoodruff是的,这毫无意义,我想纯粹是政治上的胡扯。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@TheAngryEpi @myrabatchelder @NewsHour @JudyWoodruff It's an odd framing. Out of pandemic phase (because cases are "low", but pay not attention to the unreported tests) but might go back into pandemic phase. Huh? How many times has this already happened.

@Angryepi@Myrabatcheld@NewsHour@JudyWoodruff这是一个奇怪的框架。脱离大流行阶段(因为病例“较低”,但不注意未报告的检测),但可能会回到大流行阶段。嗯?这已经发生了多少次了。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@juli_bg_bs @macroliter Only 65% is double vaxed, 30% boosted. It's higher % in high risk for the most part (maybe not in some undervalued areas).
No one (apart from a nutty antivaxers) is claiming no reduction, rather there is reduction but a lot of vaxed still dying. Not the 95%+ it once was.

@juli_bg_bs@Macrol升只有65%是双VAX,30%是增压的。在大多数情况下(可能在一些被低估的领域),高风险的风险更高%。
没有人(除了一个疯狂的反吸血鬼)声称没有减少,而是有减少,但很多吸血鬼仍在死亡。而不是过去的95%以上。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@myrabatchelder @NewsHour @JudyWoodruff @CDCgov This severely understates the situation due to low reported testing.
https://twitter.com/ScottGottl...

From @johnbrownstein, evidence that a lot of testing has shifted to at home tests
In turn, ascertainment of positive covid cases has declined
Official cases are undercounting actual infections by wider margin than any point since perhaps late 2020, when testing first ramped up https://twitter.com/johnbrowns...

发表时间:4年前 作者:Scott Gottlieb, MD @ScottGottliebMD

@MyraBatcheld@NewsHour@JudyWoodruff@CDCgov这严重低估了情况,因为报告的检测很少。
https://twitter.com/ScottGottl...

来自@johnbrownstein的证据表明,很多测试已经转向了在家测试
反过来,新冠病毒阳性病例的确定率也有所下降
官方病例对实际感染人数的低估幅度可能比2020年末以来的任何时候都要大,当时检测首次增加https://twitter.com/johnbrowns...

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@SDGovCrisis @fitterhappierAJ The cluster of cases in the US is in Alabama, which was barely locked down at all for a little while in 2020 and quickly reopened.

@SDGovCrism@fitterhappierAJ美国的病例群在阿拉巴马州,该州在2020年几乎没有被封锁一段时间,并很快重新开放。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@wsbgnl The fallacy here is that, hypotheticals aside, US isn't even remotely 100% vaccinated. High vaccinated deaths means a lot in the US.

@wsbgnl这里的谬论是,撇开假设不谈,美国甚至没有100%接种疫苗。高接种死亡率在美国意义重大。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@AmandaBalleng99 @VaxxYou @DrLiver @EricTopol @CDCMMWR "All" was simplification. It isn't common at all for healthy kids to get blood draws.

@AmandaBalleng99@VaxxYou@DrLiver@EricTopol@CDCMMWR“所有”都是简化。健康的孩子抽血并不常见。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@oneunderscore__ It's being turned into a subscription feature!

@OneUnderline___;它正在变成订阅功能!

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@VaxxYou @DrLiver @EricTopol @CDCMMWR It is of course important. The problem is that blood draws are a very biased sample. You're only getting sick kids measured.

@VaxxYou@DrLiver@EricTopol@CDCMMWR这当然很重要。问题是抽血是一个非常有偏见的样本。你只会生病。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@AnitraWheels @LazarusLong13 They used to. Once political decision was made to kill masks, they stopped.

@AnitraWheels@LazarusLong13他们曾经。一旦做出了杀掉口罩的政治决定,他们就停止了。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JReinerMD There is almost never follow up on these celebrity positive test stories, but most will develop symptoms later. Unlike regular folk, they are tested often so detect positive before symptoms.

@JReinerMD这些名人检测呈阳性的故事几乎没有后续报道,但大多数会在以后出现症状。与普通人不同的是,他们经常接受检测,因此在出现症状之前检测出阳性。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情