@edwinhollins @DrTomFrieden It's good to raise these questions for the audience but realize he hasn't engaged with a reply since last July (even then only a handful of times ever).
It's essentially a publicist broadcast account.

@edwinhollins@DrTomFrieden向观众提出这些问题是件好事，但他意识到，自去年7月以来，他一直没有回复（即使在那时，也只有几次）。
它本质上是一个公关广播账户。

@Incindery1 Take your chances without paxlovid, just like before.
No tools for you.

@像以前一样，在没有paxlovid的情况下冒险。
没有工具给你。

@lcaseylyn @kprather88 Can always still reduce, which is worthwhile not only because of increased chance of avoiding but because this is not one-and-done. Getting infected fewer times and less often is better than more times and more often.

@lcaseylyn@kprather88仍然可以减少，这是值得的，不仅因为避免的机会增加了，而且因为这不是一件容易的事。感染次数越少越好。

@CassandraTSLAQ @wsbgnl I don't think it was ever intended to improve vaccination. It was only a few of the dumbest of the dumb blue checks pushing that idea.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@CassandraTSLAQ@wsbgnl我不认为这是为了改善疫苗接种。这只是推动这一想法的愚蠢的蓝支票中最愚蠢的几个。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@amillerphd @normdeviate @wsbgnl Sure, nobody wants to do a poll, but "somebody" knows how many parents are actually actively protesting vs the ones who either support the move (and therefore no particular reason to speak up) or don't really care and will go with whatever the rules are.

@Amillerphid@normdegree@wsbgnl当然，没有人想做一个民意调查，但“有人”知道有多少父母实际上在积极抗议，而不是那些要么支持这一举措（因此没有特别的理由发声），要么不真的在乎并会遵守任何规则的父母。

@ftboayi @hjelle_brian @micval67 "Fully" vaccinated was never a real thing with this type of virus. It was spin to improve uptake. These are "get through the wave" vaccines like a flu shot, always were.

@ftboayi@hjelle_brian@micval67“完全”接种这种病毒从来都不是真的。这是为了提高摄取量。这些都是像流感疫苗一样的“穿越浪潮”疫苗，一直都是。

@hjelle_brian Wildfires?

@hjelle_brian野火？

@amillerphd @normdeviate @wsbgnl (And it's not just the literal map of course. The rhetoric from almost all of the "experts" is "nothing to worry about".)

@amillerphd@normdegree@wsbgnl（当然，这不仅仅是字面意义上的地图。几乎所有“专家”的修辞都“没什么好担心的”。）

@amillerphd @normdeviate @wsbgnl How many parents are protesting?
BTW, there's a poll question on that. Majority favors masks in schools.
But the green map thing is interesting because all of the questions are "if there is a resurgence".

@Amillerphid@normdegree@wsbgnl有多少家长在抗议？
顺便说一句，这是一个民调问题。大多数人喜欢在学校戴口罩。
但绿色地图的事情很有趣，因为所有的问题都是“如果有复苏”。

@OopsITweetedAgn @mehdirhasan Share of adult population vaxed largely plateaued months ago. Most of the shots being given out are boosters.

@OopsITweetedAgn@mehdirhasan成年人口的比例在几个月前基本稳定。大多数注射都是助推器。

@amillerphd @normdeviate @wsbgnl Look at question 4. Majority says cases not climbing in their area, even though this is probably wrong. Green map effect potentially.
https://twitter.com/wsbgnl/sta...

@Amillerphid@normdegree@wsbgnl看问题4。大多数人说，病例在他们所在地区没有上升，尽管这可能是错误的。绿色地图效应。
https://twitter.com/wsbgnl/sta...

@NjbBari3 @HZiauddeen That must have been it. Unless there are colds with long incubation period. I think I looked into that the time and concluded not. Tested neg for covid and neg covid ab later, so definitely not covid.

@NJBari3@HZiauddeen一定就是这样。除非有潜伏期长的感冒。我想我当时已经调查过了，但没有得出结论。后来对neg进行了新冠病毒和新冠病毒抗体检测，所以肯定不是新冠病毒。

@hjelle_brian @ftboayi @micval67 Well, "scientists", mostly not, but the high profile politico-scientists...
Note date here. This was when the big talking point was hesitancy. https://t.co/9jTrsqVkJ1

@hjelle_brian@ftboayi@micval67嗯，“科学家”，大部分不是，但高调的政治科学家。。。
在这里记下日期。此时，主要的话题是犹豫不决。https://t.co/9jTrsqVkJ1

@NjbBari3 @HZiauddeen I got a cold well into in 14 day very strict quarantine (I'd say literal zero chance of infection from a person during that period). I figured the cold virus must have been lingering in the premises somehow.

@NJBari3@HZiauddeen我在14天的严格隔离中患了感冒（我认为在这段时间内，从人身上感染的几率几乎为零）。我想感冒病毒一定是不知怎的一直在房子里徘徊。

@ftboayi @micval67 @hjelle_brian It's pretty much like an annual flu shot at this point, except the virus is less seasonal so you might need 2x year. It's not a lifetime vaccine, and never was. Scientists always knew this but downplayed it to get uptake.
June 2020:
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/0... https://t.co/oXknWPFla2

@ftboayi@micval67@hjelle_-brian这一点很像每年注射一次流感疫苗，只是病毒的季节性较低，所以你可能需要2年。它不是终身疫苗，也从来不是。科学家们一直都知道这一点，但为了得到理解，他们淡化了这一点。
2020年6月：
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/0... https://t.co/oXknWPFla2

@JennD2468 @JeromeAdamsMD The picture has a date. One person here is rewriting history and it isn't me.

@JennD2468@JeromeAdamsMD这张照片有日期。这里有一个人正在改写历史，而不是我。

@LisaForKansas It also bolsters antivax propaganda when it is demonstrated to be false. Much better to be truthful and explain vaccines reduce but do not prevent deaths.

@LisaForKansas当它被证明是虚假的时候，它也支持反vax的宣传。说实话和解释疫苗能减少但不能防止死亡要好得多。

@micah_arsham @avierkant @mtosterholm @CIDRAP All bets are off if any sort of mask is loose. Ear loops are not as secure as head straps but can still be sized to fit tightly.

@micah_arsham@avierkant@mtosterholm@CIDRAP如果任何类型的面具松动，所有赌注都将被取消。耳环不像头带那样牢固，但仍然可以调整大小，使其紧密贴合。

@stimmyskye @AnneofKingston @snarkypeds @Sue_Innovates @DrLeanaWen These are rough averages, and there are going to be a variety of factors: How close, how good is ventilation, breathing vs. talking vs. singing vs. heavy breathing. Etc.
Yes, this table refers to original virus. More transmissible variants likely faster.

@stimmyskye@AnneofKingston@snarkypeds@Sue_Innovations@DrLeanaWen这些是粗略的平均值，将有多种因素：距离有多近，通风有多好，呼吸与交谈与歌唱与沉重呼吸。等
是的，这张表是指原始病毒。更多可传播的变种可能更快。

@AnneofKingston @snarkypeds @Sue_Innovates @DrLeanaWen These are averages (can be more or less in practice) based on a particular set of assumptions and also refer to the original virus. More transmissible variants are likely to transmit faster.
Also, guidance on even cloth masks always said to fit snugly. Not everyone does ofc.

@AnneofKingston@snarkypeds@Sue_Innovates@DrLeanaWen这些是基于一组特定假设的平均值（在实践中可能或多或少），也指原始病毒。更多可传播的变种可能传播得更快。
此外，即使是布面口罩的指导也总是说要贴身。并不是每个人都这么做。