用户 Brrrrryce Weiner(@ BryceWeiner) 的最新消息

I don't know what the answer to all of this is.
I know what it is not, and it is not more police.
https://twitter.com/Thefedends...

@BryceWeiner NO , NO THEY WONT BECAUSE THE ONES THAT KNOW KNOW AND THE ONES THAT DONT ARE IN A CULT

发表时间:2天前 作者:sonsofliberty2016 @Thefedendsnow

我不知道这一切的答案是什么。
我知道这不是什么,也不是更多的警察。
https://twitter.com/Thefedends...

@布莱斯·韦纳不,不,他们不会,因为知道的人和不知道的人都在崇拜中

发表时间:2天前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

Eventually folks will figure out it's not the guns that are the problem.
It's the police and the militarization of law enforcement.
Some day.

最终人们会发现问题不在于枪。
这是警察和执法的军事化。
总有一天。

发表时间:2天前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

LASD was on the TV not 48 hours ago calling for more money because Southern California is a "third world country".
So, probably not.
https://twitter.com/setanimals...

@BryceWeiner I mean is there a chance that the level of fuck up here might create some legit force of outrage or are we really that far gone? The clusterfuck is beyond insane here.

发表时间:2天前 作者:Set Animals @setanimals

因为南加州是一个“第三世界国家”,拉萨德在48小时前还在电视上呼吁增加资金。
所以,可能不是。
https://twitter.com/setanimals...

@布莱斯韦纳,我的意思是,这里的混乱程度有没有可能产生一些合法的愤怒力量,或者我们真的走了那么远?这里的clusterfuck简直是疯了。

发表时间:2天前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

The police exist to protect property.
They do not exist to protect you.

警察的存在是为了保护财产。
它们的存在不是为了保护你。

发表时间:2天前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

Me: Cops don't prevent crime.
Flatheads: Lol moron
Reality: https://twitter.com/AndySpecht...

Cops stood outside the school while the killer rampaged inside.
Onlookers yelled at them to go in. They didn’t. One parent urged bystanders:
“Let’s just rush in because the cops aren’t doing anything like they are supposed to.” @AP story:
https://apnews.com/article/uva...

发表时间:3天前 作者:Andy Specht @AndySpecht

我:警察不能阻止犯罪。
平头:Lol笨蛋
现实情况:https://twitter.com/AndySpecht...

警察站在学校外面,凶手在学校里大发雷霆。
旁观者大声叫他们进去。他们没有。一位家长敦促旁观者:
“我们赶紧进去吧,因为警察没有做他们应该做的事情。”@美联社报道:
https://apnews.com/article/uva...

发表时间:2天前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

RT: Zach had to update his ‘significant’ as Angelenos hurried to remind him that in LA, anything under 5, we dismiss as someone passing gas.
do better Zach.
#Earthquake https://twitter.com/ZachCoveyT...

RT:扎克必须更新他的“重要”信息,因为安杰里诺斯急忙提醒他,在洛杉矶,任何低于5岁的人,我们都会认为是有人在放屁。
做得更好,扎克。
#地震https://twitter.com/ZachCoveyT...

发表时间:2天前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@JorgeStolfi @WannaBuffett @eronflo @GrayskullJeff None of that ever happened.
It's pure fantasy.

@[email protected]@[email protected]这些都没有发生过。
这纯粹是幻想。

发表时间:2天前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@JorgeStolfi @WannaBuffett @eronflo @GrayskullJeff Being called a "scammer" by a colonizer imperialist is a compliment.

@[email protected]@[email protected]被殖民帝国主义者称为“骗子”是一种恭维。

发表时间:2天前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

RT: Zero.
Send everything to zero.
EVERYTHING. https://t.co/uGKdsHHcYt

RT:零。
把一切都归零。
一切。https://t.co/uGKdsHHcYt

发表时间:3天前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

RT: @DavidGibbons @JorgeStolfi "How dare you people create your own assets at will, proclaim them to have any value at all, and then have the NERVE to trade them amongst yourselves without ANYONE approving or making rules? Who do you think you are?"
That's this whole thread in a nutshell.

RT:@[email protected]“你们这些人怎么敢随意创造自己的资产,宣称它们有任何价值,然后有勇气在没有任何人批准或制定规则的情况下在自己之间进行交易?你们以为自己是谁?”
简而言之,这就是整条线。

发表时间:3天前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@DavidGibbons @JorgeStolfi know when you've won

@[email protected]知道你什么时候赢了

发表时间:3天前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@DavidGibbons @JorgeStolfi Why did Bitcoin catch on, at all?
A monoculture of global finance is not good. Markets need buyers and sellers. It needs competition. Bootstrapping that competition is wildly profitable, and so is the end result.

@[email protected]为什么比特币会流行起来?
全球金融的单一文化是不好的。市场需要买家和卖家。它需要竞争。在这种竞争中自力更生是非常有利可图的,最终结果也是如此。

发表时间:3天前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

Twisted Sister - We're Not Gonna Take It
https://youtu.be/4xmckWVPRaI

扭曲的妹妹-我们不会接受的
https://youtu.be/4xmckWVPRaI

发表时间:3天前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@DavidGibbons @JorgeStolfi No, I mean literally hungry.
Not metaphor.
Dude. Your lack of economic struggle is showing.

@[email protected]不,我的意思是真的饿了。
不是隐喻。
伙计。你缺乏经济斗争的表现。

发表时间:3天前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@DavidGibbons @JorgeStolfi "How dare you people create your own assets at will, proclaim them to have any value at all, and then have the NERVE to trade them amongst yourselves without ANYONE approving or making rules? Who do you think you are?"
That's this whole thread in a nutshell.

@[email protected]“你们这些人怎么敢随意创造自己的资产,宣称它们有任何价值,然后有勇气在没有任何人批准或制定规则的情况下进行交易?你们以为自己是谁?”
简而言之,这就是整条线。

发表时间:3天前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@DavidGibbons @JorgeStolfi The innovation here is the lowering of barriers of entry into fintech.
People *hate* that.

@[email protected]这里的创新是降低进入fintech的壁垒。
人们讨厌这样。

发表时间:3天前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@DavidGibbons @JorgeStolfi That's ridiculous.
Fortune favors the hungry.
You don't have to be "bold" or "courageous". There's nothing noble in creating a product and selling it.
It does require the desire to eat. The desire to sleep in a bed.
Boldness need not apply.

@[email protected]这太荒谬了。
幸运眷顾饥饿的人。
你不必“大胆”或“勇敢”。创造并销售一种产品没有什么高尚之处。
它确实需要吃的欲望。睡在床上的欲望。
大胆不一定适用。

发表时间:3天前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@DavidGibbons @JorgeStolfi That's not false equivalence.
It demonstrates opportunities beyond simply waiting for market prices to do something.
That's what needs to be ignored for your perspective to be accurate.

@[email protected]这不是错误的等价。
它展示了不仅仅是等待市场价格来做某事的机会。
为了让你的观点准确,这就是需要忽略的。

发表时间:3天前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情

@DavidGibbons @JorgeStolfi Educate me. I'm intrigued.

@[email protected]教育我。我很好奇。

发表时间:3天前 作者:Brrrrryce Weiner @BryceWeiner详情