@plaidjon @WolfgangLohmann @initc3org
To be honest, there was a time when no one took me seriously, either.

@plaidjon@WolfgangLohmann@initc3org
说实话，曾经也没有人把我当回事。

@TokenPow1 Not if you're looking at the wrong picture.

@如果你看错了图片，就不要看。

@JayBeans4 @ToneVays @BitcoinKhaleesi @FJasonSeibert @chainlink The assignees are EMC Corp and Cornell Univ., not Chainlink.

@JayBeans4@ToneVays@BitcoinKhaleesi@FJasonSeibert@chainlink受让人是EMC公司和康奈尔大学，而不是chainlink。

@WolfgangLohmann @plaidjon @initc3org Show me! I'm wiling to license my IP for #BSV use at the protocol level. While I'm not nearly as smart as CSW, IP lawyers or progenitors of the other chains, my layman's interpretation of my IP is that it covers most PoS implementations, swaps, most derivatives & tokenized assets

@WolfgangLohmann@plaidjon@initc3org告诉我！我打算授权我的IP用于#BSV协议级别。虽然我没有CSW、知识产权律师或其他连锁店的创始人那么聪明，但我的门外汉对我的知识产权的理解是，它涵盖了大多数PoS实施、掉期、大多数衍生品和；标记化资产

@bitcoinkaiser Delineate, if you will, the specific patent #s (or Google patent links) that cover metanet.

@如果你愿意的话，bitcoinkaiser可以描述覆盖metanet的具体专利（或谷歌专利链接）。

It may be beneficial for you to chat with @PeterSchiff, no? :-) https://twitter.com/silverguru...

与@PeterSchiff聊天可能对你有益，不是吗？：-）https://twitter.com/silverguru...

@TokenPow1 That is a dramatic, and inaccurate oversimplification.

@这是一种戏剧性的、不准确的过分简化。

@F00261500 I think you're right on both points.

@F00261500我认为你在这两点上都是对的。

@isaacmorehouse That's what all big companies want you to think, so they'll never be challenged by smaller moving, innovative entrepreneurs. Patents are "thug collusion protection" for little guys. Attached is a snippet of a communication from the inside of the anti-entrepreneur patent cabal. https://t.co/5VbhGNItiN

@艾萨克莫尔豪斯所有大公司都希望你这么想，这样他们就永远不会受到小规模、流动的、创新的企业家的挑战。专利是小家伙的“暴徒共谋保护”。附件是一段来自反企业家专利阴谋集团内部的通信片段。https://t.co/5VbhGNItiN

@JayBeans4 @ToneVays @BitcoinKhaleesi @FJasonSeibert @chainlink Well, there's plenty of infringement from the biggest names, you are just not privy to what is going on behind closed doors.
I'm calling #BullS1t on @chainlink (we just accumulate IP) nonsense. Just assign all of your patents over to me & I'll agree not to use them on you. Deal?

@JayBeans4@ToneVays@BitcoinKhaleesi@FJasonSeibert@chainlink好吧，有很多大牌公司的侵权行为，你只是不知道闭门后发生了什么。
我在@chainlink上称#BullS1t（我们只是积累IP）毫无意义。只要把你所有的专利转让给我就行了；我同意不把它们用在你身上。处理

I really, really do like these short animations. https://twitter.com/FreddieOct...

我真的很喜欢这些短动画。https://twitter.com/FreddieOct...

RT: @ReggieMiddleton talks with @silverguru22, explains crytpo technology better than anyone else in the first 9 minutes. And look at the size of his hands! #ninjanation, @lisamightydavis,@arcanebear https://t.co/KLXIfi5szs

转发：@ReggieMiddleton与@silverguru22对话，在前9分钟里，crytpo技术比任何人都好。看看他的手有多大#ninjanation，@lisamightydavis，@arcanebearhttps://t.co/KLXIfi5szs

@CAVENDISH8888 That is too elementary a viewpoint. Stratification of wealth does not necessarily entail manipulation. Some people are just smarter, harder working, or just plain old luckier than other. While manipulation may be commonplace, in excess it is no longer a market, < price discovery

@卡文迪什8888这是一个太初级的观点。财富分层并不一定需要操纵。有些人只是比其他人更聪明、更努力，或者只是比其他人更幸运。虽然操纵可能很常见，但它已不再是一个市场，<；价格发现

@MrSteedly @silverguru22 Thanks!

@MrSteedly@silverguru22谢谢！

@coin_sv It's not about the number of patents, but what the patents actually say.
Larry Page started with only one.
Ditton with Jeff Bezos.
You probably know the rest of those stories. I'd rather have one foundational tech patent than a thousand others.

@这不是关于专利的数量，而是专利的实际含义。
拉里·佩奇一开始只有一个。
迪顿和杰夫·贝佐斯。
你可能知道其余的故事。我宁愿拥有一项基础技术专利，也不愿拥有一千项其他专利。

@JayBeans4 @ToneVays @BitcoinKhaleesi @FJasonSeibert @chainlink Explain to me how you came to the conclusion that @chainlink would never go to court? I guess I can use their tech without recourse?
Have I went to court?
How do you know any of the other patent holders haven't already started enforcing their rights (hint, they have already).

@JayBeans4@ToneVays@BitcoinKhaleesi@FJasonSeibert@chainlink向我解释你是如何得出@chainlink永远不会上法庭的结论的？我想我可以不借助他们的技术？
我上过法庭吗？
你怎么知道其他专利持有者还没有开始行使他们的权利（提示，他们已经开始了）。

@el33th4xor @plaidjon but that's highly misleading. Much of the transaction cost stack comes from the #USD price translation. Scale $AVAX outstanding token price to that of @ethereum, and you get $4.33 transactions. Now, Avalanche is still cheaper, until it's price spikes more https://twitter.com/plaidjon/s...

@el33th4xor@plaidjon但这是非常误导的。大部分交易成本来自#美元价格换算。将$AVAX未付代币价格调整为@ethereum，您将获得$4.33的交易。现在，雪崩仍然更便宜，直到它的价格进一步飙升https://twitter.com/plaidjon/s...

@Kratos547 @Pac_Man_1967 It's a relatively deep topic since the additional variables of counterparty risk and the quadrification of asset's existence come into play:
- Ownership
- Custody
- Possession
- Control
Before this new age, these questions never had to be asked, other than possession & ownership

@Kratos547@Pac_Man_1967这是一个相对深入的话题，因为交易对手风险的附加变量和资产存在的四次化开始发挥作用：
-所有权
-监护权
-占有
-控制
在这个新时代之前，这些问题从来都不需要问，除了占有和；所有权

This sounds good to me. What is the "educated", "factual" counterpoint? https://twitter.com/Max0SV/sta...

听起来不错。什么是“受过教育的”、“事实的”对位？https://twitter.com/Max0SV/sta...

RT: Democratisation of access to P2P capital markets where anything of value can be traded between unknown entities without the need for any gatekeepers. Crypto industry needs to license @ReggieMiddleton's IP or get run over by Wall Street...Tick Tock @kurtwuckertjr @vamosvigilante

RT：P2P资本市场准入的民主化，在P2P资本市场中，任何有价值的东西都可以在未知实体之间进行交易，而无需任何看门人。加密行业需要授权@ReggieMiddleton的IP，否则就会被华尔街压垮。。。滴答声@kurtwuckertjr@vamoswillinte