@SigmoidFrund @CalvinAyre @bitcoinkaiser Did the Whitepaper actually teach to how to construct and enact an SPV wallet, or did it simply mention and/or describe it I am far from a lawyer, but I have realized that many laypersons don't seem to truly understand the nuances of prior art.

@SigmoidFrund@CalvinAyre@bitcoinkaiser白皮书是否真的教授了如何构建和实施SPV钱包，或者只是简单地提到和/或描述了它？我远非律师，但我意识到，许多外行似乎并不真正理解现有技术的细微差别。

@SigmoidFrund @CalvinAyre @bitcoinkaiser Are you guessing or did you actually research that. Remember, facts only unless you explicitly label your comment as your opinion.

@SigmoidFrund@CalvinAyre@bitcoinkaiser你是在猜测还是真的在研究这个问题。记住，只有当你明确地将你的评论标记为你的观点时，才是事实。

@matthurd23 What makes you think I went for Theta first?
I didn't for them. I was invited to an AMA, I said "H!", they booted & slandered me. I've had a lot of requests for opinion on their IP, @dao_veri offered to do the IP analysis that the tokenholders requested but mgmt refused. to do

@马特23你凭什么认为我先选了西塔？
我不喜欢他们。我被邀请参加AMA，我说“H！”，他们启动&；诽谤我。我收到了很多关于他们IP的意见请求，@dao_veri提出要做令牌持有人要求的IP分析，但mgmt拒绝了。做

@NSKinsella @kurtwuckertjr Instead of granted me an audience, my preference is that you fade to the background.
Anymore insults or attacks, and you are blocked.
Add something constructive to the conversation, or add nothing at all.

@NSKinsella@kurtwuckertjr不是给我一个观众，我更喜欢你淡入背景。
如果你再受到侮辱或攻击，你就会被封锁。
在对话中添加一些建设性的内容，或者什么都不添加。

Maximization of value for Theta Labs and Theta tokenholders doesn't necessarily have to be mutually exclusive, but I would be remiss if I said the appearance of the tokenholders' interests diverging from that of Theta Labs didn't cross my mind after their behavior the other day. https://twitter.com/FOMOtheDog...

Theta Labs和Theta Tokenholder的价值最大化不一定是相互排斥的，但如果我说，在他们前几天的行为之后，我没有想到他们的利益与Theta Labs的利益出现分歧，那我就是失职了。https://twitter.com/FOMOtheDog...

@dao_veri @Theta_Network @Veritaseuminc Conditional value transfer is where I recommend @dao_veri members look first. If anything of interest is found related to our patents, I plan to act as an activist for the @Theta_Network tokenholders to maximize token value through use of our IP. I would expect mgmt to cooperate https://t.co/eLPi1iTQ4u

@dao_veri@Theta_Network@Veritaseuminc条件值转移是我建议@dao_veri成员首先查看的地方。如果发现任何与我们的专利相关的利益，我计划作为@Theta_网络代币持有人的积极分子，通过使用我们的IP实现代币价值最大化。我希望管理层能合作https://t.co/eLPi1iTQ4u

@LudovicoSettem3 @JayBeans4 @ToneVays @BitcoinKhaleesi @FJasonSeibert @chainlink @SergeyNazarov @JunkoSu22993224 That depends on the representations of Chainlink. The author said the company represented the patents belonged to them., and that was what my comment was in response to.

@LudovicoSettem3@JayBeans4@ToneVays@BitcoinKhaleesi@FJasonSeibert@chainlink@SergeyNazarov@JunkoSu22993224，这取决于chainlink的表示。作者说，该公司代表了属于他们的专利。，这就是我的回应。

Interesting! The mere fact that an empirical study is being performed should be much appreciated by @Theta_Network token holders. It's unfortunate these answers are coming form dao_veri - a totally unrelated entity - instead of Theta mgmt. My offer to talk licensure. still open https://twitter.com/dao_veri/s...

有趣的@Theta_网络代币持有者应该非常重视正在进行的实证研究这一事实。不幸的是，这些答案来自dao_veri——一个完全不相关的实体——而不是Theta mgmt。我提议谈论许可证。还开着吗https://twitter.com/dao_veri/s...

@anthonyrappa4 @JayBeans4 @ToneVays @BitcoinKhaleesi @FJasonSeibert @chainlink @SergeyNazarov @JunkoSu22993224 I can tell you from experience, some of us don't get treated like that.

@Anthonyrapa4@JayBeans4@ToneVays@BitcoinKhaleesi@FJasonSeibert@chainlink@SergeyNazarov@JunkoSu22993224我可以从经验告诉你，我们中的一些人不会受到这样的对待。

@anthonyrappa4 @JayBeans4 @ToneVays @BitcoinKhaleesi @FJasonSeibert @chainlink @SergeyNazarov @JunkoSu22993224 But wait a minute, that would be a security, wouldn't it?

@anthonyrappa4@JayBeans4@ToneVays@BitcoinKhaleesi@FJasonSeibert@chainlink@SergeyNazarov@JunkoSu22993224但等一下，那是安全措施，不是吗？

@JayBeans4 @addingdigitz @ToneVays @BitcoinKhaleesi @FJasonSeibert @chainlink @SergeyNazarov @JunkoSu22993224 @Cornell If there are any losses from the $Link token, you may have (I'm staying out of it :-) ) been the impetus for a major class action stakeholder (no, not shareholder, but looking at the paucity of due diligence, I wouldn't doubt that either) class action lawsuit.
I hate litigation.

@JayBeans4@addingdigitz@ToneVays@BitcoinKhaleesi@FJasonSeibert@chainlink@SergeyNazarov@JunkoSu22993224@Cornell如果$Link代币有任何损失，你可能（我不参与其中：-）是集体诉讼的主要利益相关者（不，不是股东，但考虑到尽职调查的缺乏，我也毫不怀疑）集体诉讼的动力。
我讨厌诉讼。

@SigmoidFrund @CalvinAyre @bitcoinkaiser Yes, but if the white paper version is improved upon and/or obsolesced, then the market will naturally gravitate to best in market - barring restrictive pricing and or licensing parameters.
Which you rather use, a push mower or high capacity, lightweight cordless electric mower?

@SigmoidFrund@CalvinAyre@bitcoinkaiser是的，但如果白皮书版本得到改进和/或被淘汰，那么市场将自然而然地转向最佳市场——除非限制性定价和/或许可参数。
你更喜欢使用哪一种，推式割草机还是大容量、轻型无绳电动割草机？

@talgya @JayBeans4 @chainlink It's irrelevant if retail uses it. The bar is to prevent commercial profit from your property without consent and/or compensation.

@talgya@JayBeans4@chainlink如果零售使用它，那就无关紧要了。该酒吧旨在防止未经同意和/或赔偿而从您的财产中获得商业利润。

@NSKinsella @kurtwuckertjr They are if they don't address matter at hand, which you didn't. Note, you must call another names, which erodes the credibility. You were wrong to begin with, but it's alright to be wrong. You are disrespectful about being wrong. Now, obey the rules of this thread or get blocked

@NSKinsella@kurtwuckertjr如果他们不解决手头的问题，他们就是，而你没有。注意，你必须改名，这会削弱信誉。你一开始就错了，但错了也没关系。你对自己的错误不尊重。现在，请遵守此线程的规则，否则将被阻止

@addingdigitz @JayBeans4 @ToneVays @BitcoinKhaleesi @FJasonSeibert @chainlink @SergeyNazarov @JunkoSu22993224 Individuals may hold the IP in their names and license to @chainlink, but if that's the case, then scienter comes into play since that was not explicitly disclosed and the perceived lack of that disclosure imbued value to the $Link token that probably wasn't there.. I'm no lawyer

@addingdigitz@JayBeans4@ToneVays@BitcoinKhaleesi@FJasonSeibert@chainlink@SergeyNazarov@junkosu2993224个人可以以自己的名义持有知识产权，并获得@chainlink的许可，但如果是这样，然后，scienter开始发挥作用，因为这一点没有明确披露，而且人们认为缺乏披露给$Link令牌带来了价值，而$Link令牌可能并不存在。。我不是律师

@addingdigitz @JayBeans4 @ToneVays @BitcoinKhaleesi @FJasonSeibert @chainlink @SergeyNazarov @JunkoSu22993224 Well, if @chainlink infringed on a patent, with an engineering around solution 8 months away, the patent holder can fork $link, and send C&D letters to link and all of its customers, with an instant cure available by the use or the licensed fork.
See the folly of not securing IP?

@加上Digitz@JayBeans4@ToneVays@BitcoinKhaleesi@FJasonSeibert@chainlink@SergeyNazarov@junkosu2993224那么，如果@chainlink侵犯了一项专利，在8个月后的工程解决方案中，专利持有人可以提供$link，并发送C&；D向link及其所有客户发送信件，使用或许可使用的叉子可提供即时治疗。
看到没有保护IP的愚蠢了吗？

$Link whales are being invited to weigh in on this intellectual Twitter thread.
Come one, come all! https://twitter.com/JayBeans4/...

$Link鲸鱼被邀请加入这条智慧的推特帖子。
来吧，来吧！https://twitter.com/JayBeans4/...

@JayBeans4 @chainlink Trust me, you haven't seen anything yet. Wait until you find out what we are sitting on. There has been absolutely no credible IP due diligence in the space. It's so bad, that 2 or 3 patent holders could potentially control the entire industry, including most of the biggest names

@JayBeans4@chainlink相信我，你还没有看到任何东西。等你知道我们坐的是什么。该领域绝对没有可靠的知识产权尽职调查。这太糟糕了，两三个专利持有者可能会控制整个行业，包括大多数大牌企业

@F00261500 @ClassicStewie Trust me, you will likely be hearing more about anti-trust and anti-competitive behavior activities soon enough .

@F00261500@ClassicStewie相信我，你很快就会听到更多关于反垄断和反竞争行为的活动。

Thanks! https://twitter.com/SmokenmanC...

谢谢https://twitter.com/SmokenmanC...