用户 ReggieMiddleton(@ ReggieMiddleton) 的最新消息

@kurtwuckertjr @Daniel19jPro @HolePleb Well, Bitmex research also came toe the conclusion that Veritaseum was a scam, so you can guess what I think of them. I love Arthur, and all, but some of his researchers are out to lunch.

@kurtwuckertjr@Daniel19jPro@HolePleb好吧,Bitmex研究也得出结论,Veritaseum是一个骗局,所以你可以猜到我对他们的看法。我爱亚瑟,还有其他一切,但他的一些研究人员出去吃午饭了。

发表时间:4年前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@TokenPow1 I'm taking issue with the fact that you tried to congeal a fairly nuanced and complex topic into an "ism", in order to come out with a desired outcome, and that inevitably leads to a misleading, if not outright wrong, output.

@TokenPow1我反对这样一个事实,即你试图将一个相当微妙和复杂的话题凝结成一个“ism”,以便得出一个期望的结果,这不可避免地会导致一个误导性的结果,如果不是完全错误的话。

发表时间:4年前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@coin_sv He's a very powerful man, and i think the negative public narrative applied against hm has succeeded in vilifying him (if that was the end goal), but it has also succeeded in preventing many from taking the proper defensive actions against his IP hoarding, which has empowered him

@coin_sv他是一个非常有权势的人,我认为针对hm的负面公众叙事成功地诋毁了他(如果这是最终目标的话),但它也成功地阻止了许多人对他的知识产权囤积采取适当的防御行动,这赋予了他权力

发表时间:4年前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@NSKinsella @kurtwuckertjr You should not "parody" someone just because they don't agree with them. Believe it or not, as smart as you can be, you can still be wrong. What were you suggesting to take private (with private meaning you were purposely denying the public access)? I do hope it wasn't an idea! https://t.co/onSFRK285m

@NSKinsella@kurtwuckertjr你不应该仅仅因为某人不同意你的观点就“模仿”他们。信不信由你,尽管你很聪明,但你仍然可能是错的。你建议什么是私密的(私密的意思是你故意拒绝公众进入)?我真希望这不是个主意!https://t.co/onSFRK285m

发表时间:4年前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@NSKinsella @kurtwuckertjr You should not "parody" someone just because they don't agree with them. Believe it or not, you can be wrong. What were you suggesting to take private (with private meaning you were purposely denying the public access)? I do hope it wasn't a "creation of your mind", i.e., idea! https://t.co/8wf0ofUwxP

@NSKinsella@kurtwuckertjr你不应该仅仅因为某人不同意你的观点就“模仿”他们。信不信由你,你可能错了。你建议什么是私密的(私密的意思是你故意拒绝公众进入)?我真希望这不是“你的思想创造”,也就是说,创意!https://t.co/8wf0ofUwxP

发表时间:4年前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@mikegreenebuilt @Theta_Network @theta Thank you! It's good to hear the grownups speak up!

@MikeGreeneBuild@Theta_Network@Theta谢谢!听到大人大声说话真好!

发表时间:4年前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@cyberat2600 I consider that FUD. In America it's supposed to be innocent until proven guilty. If he's indicted, then it wasn't adjudicated. I don't like character assisination. It doesn't play well with me, and has nothing to do with the question that I ask. Please keep FUD off my thread!

@ CytAut2600我认为FUD。在美国,在被证明有罪之前,它应该是无辜的。如果他被起诉,那就没有判决。我不喜欢角色助理。这对我来说不太好,与我问的问题无关。请别让福德靠近我的线!

发表时间:4年前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

Watch this for 3 minutes to hear the most honest critique of the crypto industry and how and why #WallSreet is taking over. Moreover, it illustrates how even Wall Street is making one of the biggest mistakes of its history.
https://youtu.be/jEnmje5GqpQ?t... https://t.co/ZjnhMBv0aT

观看3分钟,听取对加密行业最诚实的批评,以及Wallsret接管的方式和原因。此外,它还表明,就连华尔街都在犯历史上最大的错误之一。
https://youtu.be/jEnmje5GqpQ?t... https://t.co/ZjnhMBv0aT

发表时间:4年前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@MimirSolutions @plaidjon @WolfgangLohmann @initc3org Upper right hand corner, genius! I have no desire to converse with you. So, to assist in my quest to always be polite and professional, I will politely bow out of this conversation...And I apologize for calling you a genius. That was less than professional of me.

@MimirSolutions@plaidjon@WolfgangLohmann@initc3org右上角,天才!我不想和你交谈。所以,为了帮助我始终保持礼貌和专业,我将礼貌地退出这次对话。。。我很抱歉称你为天才。那不太专业。

发表时间:4年前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@MimirSolutions @WolfgangLohmann @plaidjon @initc3org Like I said... Ok dude! If you say so! I'm not going to argue and debate with someone who casts ad hominems based on THER inability to look up a patent number.
You win....

@MimirSolutions@WolfgangLohmann@plaidjon@initc3org就像我说的。。。好的,伙计!如果你这样说!我不会和一个因为无法查找专利号而投放广告的人争论。
你赢了。。。。

发表时间:4年前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@JayBeans4 @ToneVays @BitcoinKhaleesi @FJasonSeibert @chainlink @SergeyNazarov @JunkoSu22993224 If nobody picked up in their supposedly proper pre-investment due diligence what I picked up during a 10 second glance, the industry is in considerably worse shape than I though
I believe Chainlink and I should chat anyway...

@JayBeans4@ToneVays@BitcoinKhaleesi@FJasonSeibert@chainlink@SergeyNazarov@junkosu2993224如果没有人在他们本应适当的投资前尽职调查中了解到我在10秒钟内所了解到的情况,那么这个行业的状况比我想象的要糟糕得多
我相信Chainlink和我应该聊天。。。

发表时间:4年前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@DumbMoneyMedia @silverguru22 You get the credit.

@DumbMoneyMedia@silverguru22你得到了荣誉。

发表时间:4年前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@SigmoidFrund @CalvinAyre @bitcoinkaiser You are grossly underestimating patent examiners if you think something like that flew past them.
DLT patents are very hard to get (90% rejection rate in the US, higher in some other offices). In addition, if you haven't read the claims, you don't know what was patented.

@SigmoidFrund@CalvinAyre@bitcoinkaiser如果你认为这样的事情从专利审查员身边飞过,你就大大低估了他们。
DLT专利很难获得(美国的拒绝率为90%,其他一些办公室的拒绝率更高)。此外,如果你还没有读过这些声明,你就不知道什么是专利。

发表时间:4年前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@MimirSolutions @WolfgangLohmann @plaidjon @initc3org Ok dude! If you say so!

@MimirSolutions@WolfgangLohmann@plaidjon@initc3org好的伙计!如果你这样说!

发表时间:4年前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@brother_bitcoin @CalvinAyre @isaacmorehouse Unfortunately, the facts say otherwise.
The biggest semiconductor businesses are were IP offices are strong.
Internet
Crypto
Pharma (think COVID vaccine race and who own)
Early PCs
Just think Qualcomm
I can go on for a while. Always back assertions up with facts!!!

@不幸的是,事实并非如此。
最大的半导体业务是知识产权办公室强大。
互联网
加密
制药公司(想想新冠病毒疫苗竞赛和世卫组织)
早期个人电脑
想想高通公司吧
我可以继续一会儿。总是用事实来支持断言!!!

发表时间:4年前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@sgbett_614 @bitcoinkaiser Those are interesting examples, but they (and you) now beg the obvious question. Until nChain/Wright/or any related entity actually enforces said patents, there's absolutely no explicit IP protection advantage to using BSV v BTC or ETH or SOL. So, if he doesn't get rough - zilch!

@sgbett_614@bitcoinkaiser这些都是有趣的例子,但它们(和你)现在提出了一个显而易见的问题。在nChain/Wright/或任何相关实体实际执行上述专利之前,使用BSV BTC或ETH或SOL绝对没有明确的知识产权保护优势。所以,如果他不变得粗野的话!

发表时间:4年前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@plaidjon @WolfgangLohmann @initc3org I've no CSW leanings, positive or negative, but life's more complex than both detractors & supporters make it out to be. He refused to claim ownership of $60B #BTC during divorce contested proceedings? And that's somehow hard to fathom? BSV has adoption issues, there's an issue

@plaidjon@WolfgangLohmann@initc3org我没有CSW倾向,无论是正面的还是负面的,但生活比这两个批评者都要复杂;支持者们说这是事实。在有争议的离婚诉讼中,他拒绝主张600亿美元BTC的所有权?这很难理解吗?BSV有收养问题,有个问题

发表时间:4年前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@plaidjon @WolfgangLohmann @initc3org In some instances, yes.

@在某些情况下,plaidjon@WolfgangLohmann@initc3org是的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@NSKinsella @kurtwuckertjr if you don't believe in intellectual property, how can you request a private call? That call will be a private exchange of ideas and information, but you just implied you didn't believe in such. So, as such, your call should be out in the open and public so we can all imbibe!!! https://t.co/1PiP9wTUYJ

@NSKinsella@kurtwuckertjr如果你不相信知识产权,你怎么能要求私人通话?那次通话将是一次私人的想法和信息交流,但你只是暗示你不相信这种说法。所以,同样地,你的电话应该公开,这样我们都可以吸收!!!https://t.co/1PiP9wTUYJ

发表时间:4年前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情

@JayBeans4 @ToneVays @BitcoinKhaleesi @FJasonSeibert @chainlink @chainlink may be licensing them, but if they are, then they don't own the IP.

@JayBeans4@ToneVays@BitcoinKhaleesi@FJasonSeibert@chainlink@chainlink可能正在授权他们,但如果他们是,那么他们就不拥有IP。

发表时间:4年前 作者:ReggieMiddleton @ReggieMiddleton详情