@Nouriel Me: when you're building a car, make sure to add BOTH a seatbelt AND airbags. Two factor safety is better than one!
Nouriel: wow cars have so many buzzwords and things people have to worry about. Driving is NGMI.

@努里尔·梅：当你在造汽车时，一定要加上安全带和安全气囊。双因素安全比单因素安全好！
诺瑞尔：哇，汽车有很多流行语和人们必须担心的事情。驾驶是NGMI。

@WallfacerAG Like, do people really think that if EA ideology did not exist, the stereotypical "techbros" would be donating millions to Doctors Without Borders or engaging with social justice advocacy?

@像WallfacerAG一样，人们真的认为如果EA意识形态不存在，刻板的“techbros”会向医生无国界组织捐赠数百万美元，或者参与社会正义宣传吗？

@WallfacerAG I actually think hidden in here is an underrated *defense* of EA: namely that it can take people whose personality type is by default closer to "compassionless calculator" and turns them into excited supporters of human flourishing.

@我实际上认为，隐藏在这里的WallfacerAG是一种被低估的EA防御：即它可以让那些性格类型默认为“无同情心计算器”的人更接近“无同情心计算器”，并使他们成为人类繁荣的兴奋支持者。

Remember that you should always test your dapp with at least one non-metamask wallet (eg. Brave, Status browser). Make sure your dapp conforms to ethereum standards, and not just to accidental properties of one particular wallet!

请记住，您应该始终使用至少一个非metamask钱包（如Brave、Status browser）测试您的dapp。确保您的dapp符合以太坊标准，而不仅仅是某个特定钱包的意外属性！

@aeyakovenko Ok so we're back where we started then? Bridged assets cannot survive 51% attacks (and in the "big chain asset bridges to small chain" case the thing that needs to be 51% attacked is small), native assets can survive them.

@aeyakovenko好的，那么我们回到了开始的地方了？桥接资产无法经受51%的攻击（在“大链资产桥接到小链”的情况下，需要受到51%攻击的东西很小），本地资产可以经受住它们。

@aeyakovenko What does "social layer on the local side" mean? The local side of the bridge is a smart contract, so it has to have formalized governance to decide where the coins go.

@aeyakovenko“当地的社会阶层”是什么意思？这座桥的本地端是一个智能合约，因此它必须有正式的治理来决定硬币的去向。

@aeyakovenko The former. Obviously at the technological singularity zkps make invalid states impossible.

@前者是aeyakovenko。显然，在技术奇点上，zkps使无效状态不可能存在。

@aeyakovenko Because what if 51% attack

@aeyakovenko因为如果51%的攻击

@antonpadmasiri Happy Monday to you too!

@安东帕德马西里也祝你星期一快乐！

RT: The Risks of LSD
https://notes.ethereum.org/@dj...
Why Liquid Staking Derivatives cannot safely exceed consensus thresholds

RT：LSD的风险
https://notes.ethereum.org/@dj。。。
为什么流动押注衍生品不能安全地超过共识阈值

@ESYudkowsky @NathanpmYoung Right, but farming in 2020 looks unrecognizably different to farming in 1820.
The capital inputs aren't just magic efficiency-improving pixie dust, they completely transform the experience of the work, to the point of completely changing what groups the work is appealing to.

@ESYudkowsky@NathanpmYoung（右），但2020年的农业与1820年的农业有着无法识别的不同。
资本投入不仅仅是提高效率的魔法，它们完全改变了工作的体验，完全改变了工作所吸引的群体。

@ESYudkowsky @NathanpmYoung Ok fair point. But that does still require lots of robots to make it possible for a few people working short hours to serve everyone.

@ESYudkowsky@NathanpmYoung Ok fair point。但这仍然需要大量的机器人，才能让少数人在短时间内为每个人服务。

@NathanpmYoung @mironov_fm Something way upstream of the next political cycle, probably?
Influencing near term elections feels saturated.

@NathanpmYoung@mironov\u可能是下一个政治周期的上游？
对近期选举的影响似乎饱和了。

@NathanpmYoung @mironov_fm I'm not convinced enough that there's a US political lobbying or campaign financing strategy that I could engage in that has reliably better-than-zero impact to want to get into that stuff myself.

@NathanpmYoung@mironov\u fm我不太相信我可以参与的美国政治游说或竞选融资战略会产生比零影响更好的影响，我自己也不想参与其中。

@NathanpmYoung @mironov_fm I mean, that's my comparative advantage as an individual, not my opinion about which system it's most important to improve in the abstract.

@NathanpmYoung@mironov\u fm我的意思是，这是我作为个人的比较优势，而不是我对哪一个系统最重要的抽象改进的观点。

@mironov_fm @NathanpmYoung I agree. I think there will always be goods that not everyone can have, and people who compete for them.
I just hope that
(i) a dignified life is available for everyone
(ii) we have social systems that channel the competitive pressure toward public benefit, and not destruction

@mironov\u fm@NathanpmYoung我同意。我认为，总会有一些不是每个人都能拥有的商品，以及为这些商品而竞争的人。
我只是希望
（i） 每个人都有尊严的生活
（ii）我们的社会制度将竞争压力导向公共利益，而不是破坏

@scott_lew_is Even our "natural" food these days contains many unnatural ingredient/additive choices!

@scott\u lew\u现在甚至是我们的“天然”食品，含有许多非天然成分/添加剂选择！

@scott_lew_is Right but I think on average people's omega 6 vs 3 balance is way lopsided in the 6 direction.

@scott\u lew\u是对的，但我认为一般人的欧米茄6比3的平衡在6个方向上是不平衡的。

@scott_lew_is Isn't there a pretty deep body of evidence that excessive omega 6 intake is unhealthy?
https://scholar.google.com/sch...

@scott\u lew\u是不是有很深的证据表明过量摄入欧米茄6是不健康的？
https://scholar.google.com/sch...

@buchmanster @soulbound_human @Leo_Glisic @TrustlessState @tokenterminal Listened to that one 2 days ago!
I think my own view is that I'm ultimately a bit confused by money-mythologizing because the term "money" combines together SoV, MoE and UoA and the crypto space is moving toward those being very very separable.

@buchmanster@soulbound\u human@Leo\u Glisic@TrustlessState@tokenterminal两天前听过这个！
我认为我自己的观点是，我最终对货币神话化有点困惑，因为“货币”一词结合了SoV、MoE和UoA，加密空间正朝着非常非常可分离的方向发展。