@benedictecallan @CiscoRucinski @jfeldman_epi Yep
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@benedictecallan @CiscoRucinski @jfeldman_epi 是的
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@Addy_Dad @michaeljburry You think 2008 was the beginning? https://t.co/s6rwdhtiIM

@Addy_Dad @michaeljburry 你认为 2008 年是开始吗？ https://t.co/s6rwdhtiIM

@Whatdoesitmake You're missing the point. Plenty of people started investing since 2020. It's a minority for sure, but still real people.

@Whatdoesitmake 你没有抓住重点。自 2020 年以来，很多人开始投资。这肯定是少数，但仍然是真实的人。

@Whatdoesitmake "No one" isn't quite right.

@Whatdoesitmake“没有人”不太正确。

@The_Real_Fly https://t.co/CwaCB7aYsv

@The_Real_Fly https://t.co/CwaCB7aYsv

@CassandraNoCov @mocoband @jmcrookston @AranetIoT Same idea. If you're doing a visit stick it in your pocket and read the recorded readings after the fact.

@CassandraNoCov @mocoband @jmcrookston @AranetIoT 同样的想法。如果您正在访问，请将其放在口袋里并在事后阅读记录的读数。

@mocoband @jmcrookston @AranetIoT Just stick it in the bottom of your kids backpack and download the samples later.

@mocoband @jmcrookston @AranetIoT 只需将它贴在孩子背包的底部，稍后再下载样本。

@jmcrookston (Yeah, I know about HEPA on the plane, and also about there being plenty of time when they aren't even turned on.)

@jmcrookston（是的，我知道飞机上的 HEPA，而且还有很多时间甚至没有打开它们。）

@jmcrookston If the plane is 2500 and the airport is 500. Well, preponderance of the evidence...

@jmcrookston如果飞机是2500，机场是500。好吧，证据的优势......

@AndrewKurtz_ @unusual_whales Well, that'll run out to the extent it hasn't already. So same difference.
It's still not clear it will work but that's the calculation on "delaying".

@AndrewKurtz_ @unusual_whales 好吧，这将用尽到它还没有的程度。所以同样的区别。
目前尚不清楚它是否会起作用，但这是关于“延迟”的计算。

@__philipn__ @michaelzlin There are really a lot of unknowns. Considering that rebounds weren't seen much in the trials, clearly the dynamics are different and you have to have to question everything about benefits and harms.

@__philipn__ @michaelzlin 真的有很多未知数。考虑到在试验中反弹的次数并不多，显然动态是不同的，你必须质疑所有关于利弊的事情。

@__philipn__ @michaelzlin Longer course also has clear potential harms, especially for fragile people most in need and most likely to have med interactions.

@__philipn__ @michaelzlin 更长的课程也有明显的潜在危害，尤其是对于最需要帮助和最有可能进行医疗互动的脆弱人群。

@StackingShares @unusual_whales Back to the office, not back to work. If production rises, then people are working, perhaps even more than before.

@StackingShares @unusual_whales 回到办公室，而不是回到工作岗位。如果产量增加，那么人们就在工作，甚至可能比以前更多。

@AndrewKurtz_ @unusual_whales Higher unemployment

@AndrewKurtz_ @unusual_whales 更高的失业率

@michaelzlin I guess it depends on the harms from the rebound (with or without a second course) as well.

@michaelzlin 我想这也取决于反弹的危害（有或没有第二道菜）。

@michaelzlin "Right thing" seems unsupported. It assumes that there aren't significant harms from the higher viral load. You might be better off without those harms and without the subsequent increased immunity (or not).

@michaelzlin“正确的事情”似乎不受支持。它假设较高的病毒载量不会造成重大危害。如果没有这些危害，并且没有随后增加的免疫力（或没有），您可能会过得更好。

@BettyB2007 @EricTopol In other words, don't go spreading until you self test negative, like anyone with a brain and not corrupt has been saying all long.

@BettyB2007 @EricTopol 换句话说，在您自测为阴性之前不要传播，就像任何有头脑且没有腐败的人一直在说的那样。

@BettyB2007 @EricTopol Those are the common rapid self tests. i.e. LFT, RAT, etc.

@BettyB2007 @EricTopol 这些是常见的快速自检。即 LFT、RAT 等。

@n_hold Touch screen could simulate rotary dial.

@n_hold 触摸屏可以模拟旋转拨号。

@adamnash @Stanford How to buy a house at 7%.
What to when you've outgrown your old house financed at 3%

@adamnash @Stanford 如何以 7% 的价格买房。
当你的老房子已经超过 3% 的融资时该怎么办