@DallasZerreXp @Sarabande_Mage @_mbdr_ Several places in Asia have had mandates.

@DallasZerreXp @Sarabande_Mage @_mbdr_ 亚洲的几个地方都有授权。

@RichardLWeiss @YouAreLobbyLud I've never considered surfaces ruled out, just less numerically dominant. Perhaps because you don't really have superspreaders from a surface, but through the air in a room full of people.

@RichardLWeiss @YouAreLobbyLud 我从来没有考虑过排除表面，只是在数量上不那么占优势。也许是因为你并没有真正从表面获得超级传播者，而是在一个满是人的房间里通过空气。

@5thFitzgerald @leseerlaubnis @BarryHunt008 @i_petersen No, and there are reusable ones (eg. envomask) where you only need to occasionally replace the filter.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@5thFitzgerald @leseerlaubnis @BarryHunt008 @i_petersen 不，有可重复使用的（例如 envomask），您只需要偶尔更换过滤器。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@leseerlaubnis @5thFitzgerald @BarryHunt008 @i_petersen If moisture becomes a problem, they can be cycled from a group and given time to dry out.

@leseerlaubnis @5thFitzgerald @BarryHunt008 @i_petersen 如果水分成为问题，可以将它们从一组中循环使用，并有时间晾干。

@leseerlaubnis @5thFitzgerald @BarryHunt008 @i_petersen That's not true. They can continue to be reused until they're physically damaged or don't fit well. For many people that can be days or weeks, particularly with the better-made masks. The straps are usually the weakest link.

@leseerlaubnis @5thFitzgerald @BarryHunt008 @i_petersen 这不是真的。它们可以继续重复使用，直到它们受到物理损坏或不合适为止。对于许多人来说，这可能需要几天或几周的时间，尤其是使用制作精良的口罩。肩带通常是最薄弱的环节。

@GosiaGasperoPhD @BarryHunt008 @indehisce This is why
https://twitter.com/jljcolorad...

@GosiaGasperoPhD @BarryHunt008 @indehisce 这就是为什么
https://twitter.com/jljcolorad...

@DotyBilly Everybody uses software. But look at the numbers between fast food and food server. Food servers are a luxury good out of reach (or at best a rare splurge) for many.

@DotyBilly 每个人都使用软件。但是看看快餐和食品服务员之间的数字。对于许多人来说，食品服务员是一种遥不可及的奢侈品（或者充其量是一种罕见的挥霍）。

@nailatrahman @wsbgnl Always did.

@nailatrahman @wsbgnl 总是这样。

@CLT_truth @AltenbergLee @ibrake4ants @julierehmeyer @EusticeTheSheep You can, but the effect will be to make you look stupid when people look back in the future and see that those things didn't in fact end. Pandemic is the same.

@CLT_truth @AltenbergLee @ibrake4ants @julierehmeyer @EusticeTheSheep 你可以，但是当人们在未来回顾并看到这些事情实际上并没有结束时，效果会让你看起来很愚蠢。大流行也是一样。

@AltenbergLee @ibrake4ants @CLT_truth @julierehmeyer @EusticeTheSheep Future historians will decide. Full stop.

@AltenbergLee @ibrake4ants @CLT_truth @julierehmeyer @EusticeTheSheep 未来的历史学家将做出决定。句号。

@RichardLWeiss @YouAreLobbyLud There's plenty of outdoor activity at night.

@RichardLWeiss @YouAreLobbyLud 晚上有很多户外活动。

@VanGennepD @i_petersen There's a big difference between asymptomatic and not knowing one had covid (infection). Many symptoms are ambiguous and might be attributed to something else or ignored.

@VanGennepD @i_petersen 无症状和不知道有covid（感染）之间存在很大差异。许多症状是模棱两可的，可能归因于其他原因或被忽略。

@i_petersen @MichaelSFuhrer @VGrubsky @AndrewHayen The population survey was a good way to get data on ascertainment rate. I'm less convinced about symptomality. And generally not sure how to apply any of that to people who now do or don't think they had covid.

@i_petersen @MichaelSFuhrer @VGrubsky @AndrewHayen 人口调查是获取确定率数据的好方法。我不太相信症状。而且通常不知道如何将其中任何一种应用于现在或不认为自己患有 covid 的人。

@i_petersen @MichaelSFuhrer @VGrubsky @AndrewHayen Then again there is a non-trivial cohort of people who are "sure" they had covid in 2019.

@i_petersen @MichaelSFuhrer @VGrubsky @AndrewHayen 然后又有一群人“确定”他们在 2019 年感染了新冠病毒。

@i_petersen @MichaelSFuhrer @VGrubsky @AndrewHayen I do think that in 2020 when there was limited access to testing, no LFTs, etc., and less awareness of the full range of symptoms. a LOT of people had covid with milder symptoms and were never diagnosed and don't consider themselves to have covid. Later, less so.

@i_petersen @MichaelSFuhrer @VGrubsky @AndrewHayen 我确实认为在 2020 年进行测试的机会有限，没有 LFT 等，并且对所有症状的认识也较少。很多人感染了症状较轻的新冠病毒，但从未被诊断出来，也不认为自己感染了新冠病毒。后来就少了。

@i_petersen @MichaelSFuhrer @VGrubsky @AndrewHayen Yes. I don't remember the details but when I looked at that a while ago the MOST COMMON symptom reported in other studies was not asked by ONS.

@i_petersen @MichaelSFuhrer @VGrubsky @AndrewHayen 是的。我不记得细节了，但是当我不久前看到其他研究中报告的最常见症状时，ONS 没有询问。

@MichaelSFuhrer I'd ask whether people in close circle are taking precautions. If you live with, work with, go to school with, etc. people not taking precautions, your own precautions, at least if "moderate", are less likely to work.

@MichaelSFuhrer 我想问问圈子里的人是否正在采取预防措施。如果您与不采取预防措施的人一起生活、工作、上学等，那么您自己的预防措施，至少在“适度”的情况下，不太可能起作用。

@i_petersen @MichaelSFuhrer @VGrubsky @AndrewHayen I don't think it is anywhere near that high. As you say some are post-infection. Also ONS questionnaire is missing some symptoms. There are some data sets where people are followed after first screening positive and most develop symptoms. Still may not consider covid though.

@i_petersen @MichaelSFuhrer @VGrubsky @AndrewHayen 我不认为它接近那么高。正如你所说，有些是感染后的。 ONS问卷也缺少一些症状。在一些数据集中，人们在首次筛查呈阳性后被跟踪，大多数人出现症状。仍然可能不考虑covid。

@teasri I'm not sure that's the right benchmark either. Mortgages spread maturity over the whole curve and have optionality. You can compare anything to anything but what does it mean?

@teasri 我也不确定这是正确的基准。抵押贷款将期限分布在整个曲线上，并具有选择权。您可以将任何事物与任何事物进行比较，但这意味着什么？

@PPC96784706 @JeromeAdamsMD @libertarian1231 @sdbaral It's a much more contagious and much deadlier disease and masks are less than 100% effective is all that is needed to answer this.

@PPC96784706 @JeromeAdamsMD @libertarian1231 @sdbaral 这是一种更具传染性和致命性的疾病，而口罩的有效性低于 100% 就可以回答这个问题。