Aeon 的最新消息
@mrchan @Comparativist The industry study ignored things like sitting on the ground, boarding/unboarding, risk at airport, taking off masks to eat/drink (or not wearing properly, or inferior to the surgical masks they assumed), and they still came up with 2% per hour (pre-alpha variant).
@Chan女士@Comparativist该行业研究忽略了诸如坐在地上、登机/退票、在机场冒险、摘下口罩吃/喝(或未正确佩戴,或低于他们假设的外科口罩)之类的事情,他们仍然得出了每小时2%的分数(阿尔法前变体)。
@Comparativist It is, but there is still a risk of infection, particularly at close range, which is documented both in theory and by case reports. 2% per hour (or perhaps 6% with much more infectious variants) may seem low, but it adds up.
@是的,但仍然存在感染风险,尤其是近距离感染,这在理论和病例报告中都有记录。每小时2%(或者可能是6%,感染性更强的变种)可能看起来很低,但总的来说是这样。
@NealBrowning According to the industry tests early in the pandemic, the risk of being infected by someone with covid near you in the plane with perfect masking is 2% per hour with less infectious strains. It might be 6% per hour now. If 2h flight, about 4 infected, more if masking poor.
@NealBrowning根据大流行早期的行业测试,在飞机上被你身边的人感染的风险为每小时2%,而感染性较低。现在可能是每小时6%。若飞行2小时,约4人感染,若掩蔽力差则更多。
@MarkAselstine @DrEricDing @DrLeanaWen @mehdirhasan Not necessarily, of course, but even if so, one has to be very optimistic to conclude that a mask alone is going to be effective over an extended period of time, including maskless in-school lunches. Not even realistic, frankly.
@当然,MarkAselstine@drericing@DrLeanaWen@mehdirhasan不一定,但即便如此,我们也必须非常乐观地得出结论,即在很长一段时间内,包括在学校午餐中,仅戴口罩是有效的。坦白说,甚至都不现实。
@jklmd123 https://www.sciencedirect.com/...
@jklmd123https://www.sciencedirect.com/...
@typbrunette @DrLeanaWen @mehdirhasan Give her a bit of slack, spinning an incoherent and immoral policy message as part of Biden's Blue Check Army is hard work. https://t.co/ke3KWsfN5G
@Typbrenette@DrLeanaWen@mehdirhasan让她放松一点,作为拜登蓝格子军的一部分,编造一个语无伦次、不道德的政策信息是一项艰巨的工作。https://t.co/ke3KWsfN5G