@Lucypurr12 @DeItaone A lot
https://sciencebasedmedicine.o...

@Lucypurr12@DeItaone很多
https://sciencebasedmedicine.o...

@R_H_Ebright "Democratic media consultant" = partisan spin doctor
Exactly the opposite of what you want to rebuild trust in public health.

@R_H__Ebright“民主媒体顾问”=党派宣传医生
与你想要重建公众健康信任的目标恰恰相反。

@sinz54 @AbraarKaran That's a different issue.
But in any case it's frankly an odd argument. Someone willing to try an N95 mask they're being given wasn't wearing no mask and won't go back to no mask if they don't like the N95. We've all tried various masks we didn't like and went back to previous.

@sinz54@AbraarKaran这是另一个问题。
但无论如何，坦率地说，这是一个奇怪的论点。一些愿意尝试N95口罩的人没有戴口罩，如果他们不喜欢N95，也不会再戴口罩。我们都试过各种我们不喜欢的面具，然后又回到了以前。

@LahtiLinda @Jessicam6946 Until hard to breath or fit is impaired, or visibly dirty or damaged.
Be careful about contamination. Avoid touching the inside and wash/sanitize hands after handling.

@LahtiLinda@Jessicam6946，直到呼吸困难或身体不适，或明显脏污或损坏。
小心污染。避免触摸内部，并在处理后洗手/消毒。

@sinz54 @AbraarKaran Yes, because that 79 year old working at Walmart as a greeter to make ends meet is going to have everyone nearby wearing N95.

@sinz54@AbraarKaran是的，因为这位79岁的在沃尔玛工作的迎宾员将让附近的每个人都穿着N95。

@vgr Move the furniture around and hope they don't notice?

@vgr移动家具，希望他们不会注意到？

@JHowardBrainMD Not far off. 1+1 does = 10 you know.

@杰沃德·布莱恩就在不远处。你知道，1+1等于10。

@JHowardBrainMD Emily Oster claims it is a little lower than 1 in 100 for kids with no comorbidities. Maybe they can resolve their "small" disagreement in the thunderdome.
https://emilyoster.substack.co... https://t.co/2rq7IkvJJ3

@JHowardBrainMD Emily Oster声称，对于没有合并症的儿童，这一比例略低于100分之一。也许他们可以在thunderdome解决他们的“小”分歧。
https://emilyoster.substack.co... https://t.co/2rq7IkvJJ3

@_RL_W @wsbgnl See what? It's already happened

@_RL_W@wsbgnl看到什么了？这已经发生了

@me_marco @DrTomFrieden It's more than that. The whole first year there were no vaccines, and for a few months of the second, relatively few vaccinated.
Vaccines work very well to prevent death, don't take this as an anti-vax message at all.
CDC data is still very misleading.

@me_marco@DrTomFrieden不止这些。整个第一年没有接种疫苗，第二年的几个月里，接种的疫苗相对较少。
疫苗在预防死亡方面效果很好，不要把它当作是一种抗vax的信息。
CDC的数据仍然具有误导性。

@OmanReagan The "unemployment rate" is low in large part because so many workers were pushed into early retirement, disabled, or dead. Hurray.

@“失业率”之所以低，很大程度上是因为这么多工人被迫提前退休、残疾或死亡。万岁。

@Lucypurr12 What does a Democratic media consultant teach other than how to spin messages in a favorable, partisan light? That's literally their job! https://t.co/K1s7EL3WEN

@Lucypurr12民主党媒体顾问除了如何以有利的、党派性的方式传播信息外，还能教什么？这就是他们的工作！https://t.co/K1s7EL3WEN

@_RL_W @wsbgnl This is just usual at the start of any surge. Younger healthier infected first, it takes some time to more vulnerable, and then addition time for those vulnerable people to die.
Omicron surge faster, so bigger case rises ahead of the slower death wave.

@_RL_W@wsbgnl这在任何喘振开始时都很常见。越年轻越健康的人首先被感染，越脆弱的人需要一段时间，然后这些脆弱的人需要额外的时间才能死亡。
Omicron的上升速度更快，所以在较慢的死亡波之前，更大的案例会上升。

@Lucypurr12 She's too busy being coached by a "Democratic media consultant"

@Lucypurr12她正忙于接受“民主党媒体顾问”的指导

@justthefacts85 Anybody who thinks this is BETTER than remote, I don't even know what the say.

@如果有人认为这比遥控器好，我甚至不知道他们怎么说。

@hellbee_ @BRok_Horrible @DrTomFrieden All that means is that the number actual breakthrough deaths is higher. People don't undie.

@hellbee@BRok\u可怕的@DrTomFrieden这意味着实际突破性死亡人数更高。人们不穿内衣。

@hellbee_ @BRok_Horrible @DrTomFrieden CDC identified 36 out of 1.3 million, a rate of about one in 36k. We know of over 26k identified deaths. If the CDC rate were representative, 26k identified deaths would occur in a population of 939 million people. This is impossible.

@hellbee@BRok@DrTomFrieden疾病预防控制中心在130万人中鉴定出36人，约为36k人中的一人。我们知道有超过2.6万人死亡。如果疾病预防控制中心的发病率具有代表性，那么在9.39亿人口中，将有2.6万人死亡。这是不可能的。

@me_marco @DrTomFrieden Over 26k vaccinated deaths have been identified, and there are certainly more (not all states are included in the tabulation). For the CDC data to be representative, the US would have to have a billion or more people. It doesn't. The CDC data is grossly misleading.

@me_marco@DrTomFrieden已经确定了超过2.6万例接种疫苗的死亡病例，当然还有更多（并非所有州都包括在表格中）。为了使CDC的数据具有代表性，美国必须有10亿甚至更多的人口。事实并非如此。CDC的数据具有严重的误导性。

@hellbee_ @BRok_Horrible @DrTomFrieden It's right there in the screen shot. Someone collected it from individual states which report it (not all).

@hellbee@BRok\u可怕的@DrTomFrieden就在屏幕截图中。有人从个别州（并非所有州）收集了这些信息。

@jcatjcatjcat @hjelle_brian Just read the findings part of the abstract, page 2.

@jcatjcatjcat@hjelle_brian刚刚阅读了摘要第2页的调查结果部分。