@grrttweaver @BrianLenzkes Nobody is saying the difference is negligible.
The claim was that the CDC said that cloth masks "don't work". CDC didn't say that.

@没有人说这种差别可以忽略不计。
声称CDC说布面具“不起作用”。疾控中心没有这么说。

@grrttweaver @BrianLenzkes Even there, they make a distinction between loosely woven cloth masks and finely woven ones. It isn't a blanket statement about cloth masks:
"Loosely woven cloth products provide the least protection, layered finely woven products offer more protection"

@grrttwaver@BrianLenzkes即使在那里，他们也区分了松散编织的布面具和精细编织的面具。这不是关于布面具的笼统声明：
“松散编织的布制品提供最少的保护，分层精细编织的制品提供更多的保护”

@grrttweaver @BrianLenzkes "least protective" does not mean "don't work"

@grrttwaver@BrianLenzkes“保护性最低”并不意味着“不工作”

@BrianLenzkes CDC hasn't said that. You're spreading misinformation.

@BrianLenzkes疾病预防控制中心没有这么说。你在散布错误信息。

@citeyourwork @dianaberrent All of them. One test doesn't do much.

@citeyourwork@Dianaborrent所有人。一次测试没什么用。

@510bythebay @wsbgnl @myrabatchelder The root problem is that it is polarized. https://t.co/JDvVZR5eXc

@510bythebay@wsbgnl@myrabatcheld根本问题在于它是两极化的。https://t.co/JDvVZR5eXc

@but_rly_tho @wsbgnl Somewhat. This is the big one https://t.co/Vw038IH13L

@但是有点像wsbgnl。这是最大的一个https://t.co/Vw038IH13L

@wsbgnl They didn't poll the right private equity investors.

@wsbgnl他们没有选出合适的私募股权投资者。

@sri_srikrishna @ZekeEmanuel @drdavidmichaels Optimistic

@sri_srikrishna@ZekeEmanuel@drdavidmichaels

@ZekeEmanuel @drdavidmichaels 400 million is utterly insufficient.

@ZekeEmanuel@drdavidmichaels 4亿是完全不够的。

@psuedonyms @wsbgnl Insufficient to solve problem, see above.

@psuedonyms@wsbgnl不足以解决问题，请参见上文。

@rmojomojito1 Re: college. SOME did, but not many
https://www.statista.com/stati... https://t.co/o5pa1ZwrHm

@关于：大学。有些人这样做了，但不多
https://www.statista.com/stati... https://t.co/o5pa1ZwrHm

@Lucypurr12 @wsbgnl 🤷

@Lucypurr12@wsbgnl🤷

@GregStohr @irin Why not?

@GregStohr@irin为什么不呢？

@abunchoflions @CT_Bergstrom @Color Rapid LAMP tests look a lot better, if you can afford them.

@如果你能负担得起的话，abunchoflions@CT_Bergstrom@Color Rapid LAMP测试看起来好多了。

@wsbgnl There is no way for a family of four to use four tests and four masks effectively. It's insufficient.

@wsbgnl四口之家无法有效地使用四个测试和四个遮罩。这是不够的。

@wsbgnl It's the same thing over and over again: Scale of solution too small to address the problem. In this case, 400 million masks for 330 million people. That one mask supposed to last forever?
Also a question I haven't seen asked nor answered: Will the stockpile be replenished?

@wsbgnl一次又一次的重复同样的事情：解决方案的规模太小，无法解决问题。在这种情况下，3.3亿人需要4亿个面具。那个面具应该永远戴着吗？
还有一个我没有看到的问题被问到，也没有回答：库存会被补充吗？

@luckytran https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

@幸运的https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

@luckytran No one seemed to notice this
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@幸运的是，似乎没有人注意到这一点
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@doriecp It's worse. The shared/larger households are often poorer.

@多里埃普，情况更糟。共享/较大的家庭往往更穷。