@but_rly_tho @wsbgnl It's just about downplaying the whole thing. You see masks or wear a mask, you realize 'something' is going on.

@但是_rly_tho@wsbgnl这只是在淡化整件事。当你看到面具或戴上面具时，你就会意识到发生了什么。

@DaytimeDan @notdred Why shouldn't they? Clickbait engagement drives success and there is little to no accountability at any other level either.

@DaytimeDan@notdred他们为什么不应该？Clickbait参与推动成功，在任何其他层面也几乎没有责任感。

@james1chas3 @Gab_H_R Often a good basis to conclude the opposite.

@james1chas3@Gab_H_R通常是得出相反结论的良好基础。

@notdred @JasonKirell We're getting close to 12 Monkeys here.

@notdred@JasonKirell我们接近12只猴子了。

@LazarusLong13 @ibrake4ants You don't have to speculate
https://www.politico.com/newsl... https://t.co/hMLB3BZHFp

@LazarusLong13@ibrake4ants你不必猜测
https://www.politico.com/newsl... https://t.co/hMLB3BZHFp

@georgimarinov @tweet_frankie @hugowiz @spwells And that number decreases with every round of mass infection induced cognitive decline.

@georgimarinov@tweet_frankie@hugowiz@spwells，随着每一轮大规模感染导致的认知能力下降，这个数字都会下降。

@x2IndSpeculator Obvious that it is more important, if achievable. Exponential benefit > linear benefit.
Likewise, containment measures are MORE EFFECTIVE than disease-reducing vaccines at reducing disease, with tradeoffs of course.

@很明显，如果可以实现的话，它更重要。指数效益>；线性效益。
同样，在减少疾病方面，遏制措施比减少疾病的疫苗更有效，当然需要权衡。

@statsepi For those of you who continue to take Makary seriously, WAKE THE F#!$ UP.

@statsepi对于那些继续认真对待Makary的人，唤醒F#！$向上的

@NKinNewEng @wsbgnl They are talking out of the White House. What is up their ass is Zients hand.

@他们正在白宫外谈话。他们的麻烦是齐恩斯的手。

@LongCovidNYC Yeah, I think he's talked to the Biden white house too.

@是的，我想他也和拜登白宫谈过了。

@ququqem @LazarusLong13 Seen a few. https://www.modishbuy.com/adul...

@quqem@lazaruslong13 see a few。https://www.modishbuy.com/adul...

@mikejohansenmd @Fyodor32768 Considering there is weak protection of BA.1 against itself, I'm not optimistic.

@考虑到BA的保护较弱，mikejohansenmd@Fyodor32768。我并不乐观。

@LongCovidNYC He left before the pandemic.

@他在大流行前离开了纽约。

@watermelonpunch @wsbgnl It did change, it got worse.

@watermelonpunch@wsbgnl它确实改变了，但情况变得更糟了。

@wsbgnl We better get rid of all those other pesky rules, they can't continue forever! No more food safety, workplace safety, road safety, etc.

@wsbgnl我们最好摆脱所有其他讨厌的规则，它们不能永远持续下去！不再有食品安全、工作场所安全、道路安全等。

@MJaMitchell @Reuters You can translate his comment into they reviewed the contract and if they drop him they're loosing a big chunk of $100 million.

@MJaMitchell@Reuters你可以把他的评论翻译成他们审查了合同，如果他们放弃他，他们将损失1亿美元的一大笔钱。

@signingupjustt1 @ZiemniakKaren @jfeldman_epi Sure, what happens in practice is state-wide measures get largely ignored in rural areas, and not ignored where people actually live. That was true in 2020-2021, and would be true today. Does not explain why no such measures exist (other than masks, which fit this too).

@显然，在实践中，全州范围内的措施在农村地区基本上被忽视了，而在人们实际居住的地方却没有被忽视。2020-2021年是这样，今天也是这样。没有解释为什么不存在这样的措施（除了口罩，口罩也适用于此）。

@antinodales @NickytaLeb You got your vaccine now shut up and back to the coal mines.

@antinodales@NickytaLeb你现在接种了疫苗闭嘴，回煤矿去。

@JCochra50722415 @amyriscool @smbilodeau @WHO Look at people over 70 or 65 or whatever. Below that there are relatively few deaths regardless of vax status.
3 year olds (or for that matter 20 year olds) not being vaccinated doesn't matter to overall death numbers. That's included in the 72% number you just gave.

@JCochra50722415@amyriscool@smbilodeau@他们看着70岁或65岁以上的人。低于这一水平，无论vax状态如何，死亡人数相对较少。
3岁（或20岁）未接种疫苗与总体死亡人数无关。这已经包括在你刚才给出的72%的数字中了。

@JCochra50722415 @amyriscool @smbilodeau @WHO Not vaccinated is <5% of populations most at risk for death in UK, so this shows reasonably high efficacy in preventing death (unvaccinated are overrepresented by more than 4x).

@JCochra50722415@amyriscool@smbilodeau@未接种疫苗的人是<；在英国，5%的人群最有可能死亡，因此这表明在预防死亡方面具有相当高的功效（未接种疫苗的人群比例超过4倍）。