Aeon 的最新消息
@DanAncona @Rob_Sawicki @whstancil We do have evidence that she has helped "shape public opinion", though not specifically in THIS particular case.
https://www.politico.com/newsl... https://t.co/iS2OoIwiZj
@DanAncona@Rob_Sawicki@whstancil我们确实有证据表明,她帮助“塑造了公众舆论”,尽管在这起案件中没有具体说明。
https://www.politico.com/newsl... https://t.co/iS2OoIwiZj
@javierdussel @whstancil This is true but irrelevant. What is relevant is the NUMBER of vaccinated dying, and that number is substantial. Since the percentage empirically seems to be around 20-25%, this means vaccinated deaths are well into the tens of thousands and likely will reach 100k before long.
@javierdussel@whstancil这是真的,但无关紧要。与此相关的是接种疫苗后死亡的人数,而且这个数字相当可观。根据经验,这一比例似乎在20-25%左右,这意味着接种疫苗的死亡人数将达到数万人,很可能很快就会达到10万人。
@AlexNepar @Nicoleg425 @DrNeilStone @CDCgov A lot of it is spent on recruiting for some obscure thing few people know about, and then waiting for rare signals since the diseases aren't spreading like wildfire. That didn't apply in this case, and yes process was streamlined.
@AlexNepar@Nicoleg425@DrNeilStone@CDCgov很多钱都花在为一些鲜为人知的事情招募人才上,然后等待罕见的信号,因为疾病不会像野火一样蔓延。这不适用于本案,是的,流程得到了简化。
@DrNeilStone @VincentRK @CDCgov Vaccines work but if you dig down into this you see some disturbing patterns like people who are vaxed and especially boosted being whiter, richer, better educated and often more cautious. So actual effect of vaccines likely smaller than this.
@DrNeilStone@VincentRK@CDCgov疫苗是有效的,但如果你深入研究,你会发现一些令人不安的模式,比如说,那些被迷住了的人,尤其是被提拔的人,变得更白、更富有、受教育程度更高,而且往往更谨慎。所以疫苗的实际效果可能比这个小。
@eternalskeptic2 @obama_I_miss @DrLeanaWen Yes, I do. I also know the physics of how small particles (the respiratory droplets which carry virus) make their way through non-linear paths between layers fibers. That's why even shitty cloth masks are MEASURED to reduce these particles.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@drbarnesbangor @crawlings13 @denniskeim @mattyglesias This study shows a 72% reduction in aerosol particles using regular off-the-shelf cloth masks (from the underwear company LOL). Some people use better masks too (though some use worse including bandanas and such). https://t.co/omh8vuGak0
发表时间:5年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin@永久怀疑论者2@obama_I_miss@DrLeanaWen是的,我想。我还知道小颗粒(携带病毒的呼吸液滴)如何通过纤维层之间的非线性路径的物理原理。这就是为什么即使是脏兮兮的布面具也会被测量来减少这些颗粒。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@Barnesbangor博士@crawlings13@denniskeim@mattyglesias这项研究表明,使用常规现成的布面具(来自内衣公司LOL)可以减少72%的气溶胶粒子。有些人也用更好的口罩(尽管有些人用更差的,包括手帕之类的)。https://t.co/omh8vuGak0
@DailyJLee @oreganruth @GovKathyHochul The gov is the one who decided there wouldn't be any enforcement (even a little makes a huge difference as it signals that the mandate is actually a real thing). She's basically an anti masker but didn't want to look like she wasn't doing anything.
@DailyJLee@oreganruth@GovKathyHochul政府是决定不实施任何强制措施的人(哪怕是一点点都会产生巨大的影响,因为这表明这项授权实际上是真实的)。她基本上是个反面具者,但不想让人觉得她什么都没做。
@eternalskeptic2 @obama_I_miss @DrLeanaWen Do either of these pictures of cloth look like a tennis racquet to you? 🤡🤡🤡
https://www.nist.gov/feature-s... https://t.co/LrqpD5zkDS
@永久怀疑论者2@obama_I_miss@DrLeanaWen这些布料的照片在你看来像网球拍吗?🤡🤡🤡
https://www.nist.gov/feature-s... https://t.co/LrqpD5zkDS
@hdcld @notdred Vax-and-don't-worry messengers, including Leonhardt, share some fo the responsibility. Why would you go out of your way to get boosted against something that is a remote risk not worth worrying about?
@hdcld@notdred Vax和不必担心的信使,包括Leonhardt,分担了一些责任。为什么你会不遗余力地去面对一些不值得担心的遥远风险呢?