@thereal_truther https://t.co/TVQa0AasFZ

@特鲁瑟https://t.co/TVQa0AasFZ

@jklmd123 @paimadhu @Saahil_Desai They had help

@jklmd123@paimadhu@Saahil_Desai他们得到了帮助

@jklmd123 @paimadhu @Saahil_Desai Not go to restaurants is pretty much it.

@jklmd123@paimadhu@Saahil_Desai不去餐馆差不多就是了。

@jklmd123 @paimadhu @Saahil_Desai We meaning what? A lot of people truly don't grasp it.

@jklmd123@paimadhu@Saahil_Desai我们的意思是什么？很多人真的不明白。

@prolatcx @FirstSquawk No, but if Tom Clancy were writing it, a cyber attack taking down power might be how it starts.

@prolatcx@FirstSquawk没有，但如果是汤姆·克兰西写的，一次网络攻击可能会导致断电。

@AbraarKaran @nytimes Humans will adapt.

@AbraarKaran@nytimes人类将适应。

@JeromeAdamsMD Not theoretical. A lot of this was in Biden's 2020 and 2021 plans. It was ignored because cases were down, polling was up, and it looked, in a narrow way, like shots in arms was going to be enough.

@杰罗梅达姆不是理论上的。这是拜登的2020和2021计划。它被忽视了，因为案件减少了，民调上升了，从狭隘的角度看，似乎枪声就足够了。

@BamaCrazy1 @hjelle_brian 20% is an enormous difference.

@BamaCrazy1@hjelle_brian 20%是一个巨大的差异。

@CheyenneSulli14 @Dixieann18 @KyivIndependent They're not illegal if used proportionately against a military target. Big if, of course.

@CheyenneSulli14@Dixieann18@KyivIndependent如果按比例用于军事目标，它们并不违法。当然，如果是大的话。

@hughjassdevice @zorinaq @kinger6687 Specifically, infection LESS likely to occur in the mask group (1.8%) than the control group (2.1%)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.go... https://t.co/0fOsj18zUW

@hughjassdevice@zorinaq@kinger6687特别是，口罩组（1.8%）感染的可能性低于对照组（2.1%）
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.go... https://t.co/0fOsj18zUW

@hughjassdevice @zorinaq @kinger6687 Read the paper not the press release.
https://www.bmj.com/content/37... https://t.co/7FdurYPjZl

@hughjassdevice@zorinaq@kinger6687 read the paper not the press release.
https://www.bmj.com/content/37... https://t.co/7FdurYPjZl

@atleastiknowi @SoderbergFinac1 @DrEricDing @GovRonDeSantis It fits the literal definition
"seek to harm, intimidate, or coerce (someone perceived as vulnerable)"

@至少Iknowi@SoderbergFinac1@drericing@GovRonDeSantis它符合字面定义
试图伤害、恐吓或胁迫（被认为易受伤害的人）

@jklmd123 @joaquinlife It also has to be more than "guidance" and "available" funds. Too many schools and building managers don't want to bother. It has to be required or at least incentivized to make a real difference.

@jklmd123@joaquinlife它也必须不仅仅是“指导”和“可用”资金。太多的学校和建筑经理不想打扰。它必须被要求或至少被激励才能产生真正的影响。

@marwa_zaatari @LazarusLong13 @MikeLaninga @CorsIAQ @JimRosenthal4 @CleanAirCrewOrg @DavidElfstrom @3M Plot price and CADR using whatever speed setting is needed (if possible) to get to dark green-level noise. Obviously price won't change but CADR will. For people who want a solution for a quiet environment, this is information needed.

@marwa_zaatari@LazarusLong13@MikeLaninga@CorsIAQ@JimRosenthal4@CleanAirCrewOrg@DavidElfstrom@3M地块价格和CADR使用任何需要的速度设置（如果可能）达到深绿色噪音水平。显然，价格不会改变，但CADR会。对于想要一个安静环境的解决方案的人来说，这是需要的信息。

@hughjassdevice @zorinaq @kinger6687 The Denmark study didn't find zero efficacy. It found positive efficacy that was below statistical signfiicance.

@hughjassdevice@zorinaq@kinger6687丹麦的研究没有发现零疗效。它发现阳性疗效低于统计学意义。

@TwoMinded_ @zorinaq Cost benefit analysis says yes. The cost is really low, although strictly speaking not zero. The benefits are uncertain but there is ample, even if not conclusive, evidence (including in this thread) it is likely positive.

@Twodomind_u@zorinaq成本效益分析公司说是的。成本非常低，虽然严格来说不是零。其好处尚不确定，但有充分的证据（包括本文）表明它可能是积极的，即使不是决定性的。

@JoeShikhman Sounds like bluster. Not sure that's a war crime unless acted upon.

@JoeShikhman听起来像是在咆哮。除非采取行动，否则不确定这是战争罪。

@johannesaromkes @KarlWTusing @idreesali114 Also NLAW which several countries are sending to Ukraine.

@johannesaromkes@KarlWTusing@idreesali114还包括几个国家向乌克兰发送的NLAW。

@evefairbanks @Kafetii_ @geoffreyyork Those are abstentions.

@Evefirbanks@Kafetii_uu@geoffreyyork这些都是弃权票。

@marwa_zaatari @LazarusLong13 @MikeLaninga @CorsIAQ @JimRosenthal4 @CleanAirCrewOrg @DavidElfstrom @3M Would like to see a chart like this normalized for noise i.e. some devices run at lower speed if necessary to achieve comparable noise level.

@marwa_zaatari@LazarusLong13@MikeLaninga@CorsIAQ@JimRosenthal4@CleanAirCrewOrg@DavidElfstrom@3M希望看到这样的噪声标准化图表，即一些设备在必要时以较低的速度运行，以达到可比的噪声水平。