@AGoldsmithEsq @mattbc Indeed but don't expect donors to take the L quietly.

@AGoldsmithEsq@mattbc确实如此，但不要指望捐赠者会悄悄地接受这个建议。

@hjelle_brian Outdoors?

@hjelle_brian在户外？

@HeyAldi @spectatorindex https://t.co/BlkWAGHveX

@海亚尔迪https://t.co/BlkWAGHveX

@rosepetal236 @MarketRebels This is a few days old news, and it passed using a parliamentary procedure that forced a vote while a few Dems were out sick. Going nowhere.

@Rosepatel236@market叛军这是几天前的新闻，它通过了一项议会程序，在一些民主党人生病时强制进行投票。哪儿也去不了。

@Noahpinion Can't keep killing young guys for long before mothers take notice.

@在母亲们注意到之前，Noahpinion不可能长期杀害年轻人。

@MarshmallowCap @GaryHaubold @amlivemon Not if you plan to buy it a year in advance. You'll be buying 2023 fertilizer in 2022.

@MarshmallowCap@GaryHaubold@amlivemon如果你计划提前一年购买，就不会购买。你将在2022年购买2023化肥。

@MarshmallowCap @GaryHaubold @amlivemon And likewise will need to be replenished.

@棉花糖帽@GaryHaubold@amlivemon，同样需要补充。

@EaracheEye @Noahpinion Luhansk and Donetsk

@Noahpinion Luhansk和顿涅茨克的Earacheye

@Don_Milton @Yukinoguchi https://twitter.com/danfurst/s...

@Don_Milton@Yukinoguchihttps://twitter.com/danfurst/s...

@YahooNews OK boomer

@雅虎新闻OK Boomer

@prosediva Doubt that was a Saturday, but too lazy to look it up. The 7-day average is more useful. Down by about half from the peak I think.

@prosediva怀疑那是个星期六，但懒得去查。7天的平均值更有用。我想是从山顶降了一半。

@prosediva Day of week effect. Last Saturday was 650. Dropping but not THAT fast.

@prosediva周日效果。上周六是650。下降，但没那么快。

@dingelmeyer @FirstSquawk I'm not sure what the statement actually means but you could read it as helping to move a deputy/successor to a safe place.

@dingelmeyer@FirstSquawk我不确定这句话的真正意思，但你可以把它解读为帮助将副手/继任者转移到一个安全的地方。

@Acyn https://t.co/qtfWGzjmKL

阿钦https://t.co/qtfWGzjmKL

@BreeNewsome Not correct.

@有些不正确。

@_cvo_aaa @AmericaYikes @TomasGo31556382 @kaitlancollins Yeah there are a bunch of strategic considerations. I was just pointing out that NFZ leading to nuclear war is a complex supposition, not "guaranteed". It may be true, may be not. Lots of other considerations, as you say.

@_cvo_aaa@AmericaYikes@TomasGo31556382@kaitlancollins是的，有很多战略考虑。我只是指出，NFZ导致核战争是一个复杂的假设，而不是“保证”。这可能是真的，也可能不是。正如你所说，还有很多其他的考虑。

@nopointestimate @Jason @CocaCola @pepsi Cutting off those unhealthy products is helping the people.

@没有人估计@Jason@CocaCola@pepsi切断那些不健康的产品是在帮助人们。

@AfricanusPanga @Arbiter852 @Jason @CocaCola @pepsi Probably people will buy some other beverage, also locally produced.

@AfricanusPanga@Arbiter852@Jason@CocaCola@pepsi人们可能会购买一些其他的饮料，也是本地生产的。

@AmericaYikes @TomasGo31556382 @kaitlancollins Not guaranteed at all.
NFZ -> WW3 requires:
1. R has to violate NFZ once announced
2. R has to not turn back when challenged in the air
3. Russia must escalate rather than proportional or symbolic response. NATO must continue to escalate.
None is guaranteed.

@AmericaYikes@TomasGo31556382@kaitlancollins根本不保证。
NFZ->；第三次世界大战要求：
1.一旦宣布，R必须违反NFZ
2.当在空中受到挑战时，R必须不回头
3.俄罗斯必须升级，而不是按比例或象征性的回应。北约必须继续升级。
谁也不能保证。

@mattjbrunner How many people have died from nuclear war compared to flu?

@马特：与流感相比，有多少人死于核战争？