@Marco_Piani @EricTopol And then Topol posts it anyway?

@Marco_Piani@EricTopol然后Topol发布了它？

@Marco_Piani @EricTopol Okay, how is it possible for three months of data to be missing?

@Marco_Piani@EricTopol好吧，三个月的数据怎么可能丢失呢？

@TheStalwart @BlakeFelix5 @pareene Should be possible to make one that is self balancing, like the original segway.

@Stalwart@BlakeFelix5@pareene应该可以制造出一个像原始赛格威一样的自我平衡系统。

@TheStalwart @yevshrag Hydrogen from what source? It makes a big difference.

@来自何处的Stalwart@yevshrag氢气？这有很大的不同。

@MsSwank @EricTopol https://www.cnbc.com/2022/03/1...

@msswank@erictopolhttps://www.cnbc.com/2022/03/1...

@EricTopol How is it plausible that boosters were a straight line for three months?

@埃里克托波尔三个月来，助推器是一条直线，这怎么可能？

@Marco_Piani https://www.theatlantic.com/id...

@marco pianihttps://www.theatlantic.com/id...

@CamiloGuezRodri @mllichti @tar_xvzf @Gab_H_R The dichotomy is false, both conceptually and in this case in practice. China didn't focus on elimination instead of vaccination, it did both. It has a much higher vaccination rate than the US. The vaccines may be less effective (vs severe disease) but even that is not clear.

@CamiloGuezRodri@mllichti@tar_xvzf@Gab_H_R这种二分法在概念上和实践中都是错误的。中国没有把重点放在消灭疫苗上，而不是接种疫苗，而是两者兼而有之。它的疫苗接种率比美国高得多。这些疫苗的效力可能较低（与严重疾病相比），但这一点尚不清楚。

@SixandLaura @fibke The reference to some states still being hard hit yes. Since they're not peaking at the same time the way a localized outbreak does.

@SixandLaura@fibke提到一些州仍然遭受重创是的。因为它们不会像局部暴发那样同时达到峰值。

@AdvisorMikeL @XavierHelgesen @NikMilanovic Said everyone who ever clicked a twitter ad.

@AdvisorMikeL@XavierHelgesen@NikMilanovic说，所有点击过twitter广告的人。

@Wildgrisen666 @VincentRK https://twitter.com/VincentRK/...

通过honeybunny www.addic7ed.com同步https://twitter.com/VincentRK/...

@milicki2g @VincentRK https://twitter.com/VincentRK/...

@milicki2g@VincentRKhttps://twitter.com/VincentRK/...

@juli_bg_bs Nothing is free, but let's wait to see how this plays out before assessing. It would be several months of restrictions and very high disease and death over most of the country (which is not the case now) to match outcomes with most of the west.

@juli_bg__bs没有什么是免费的，但在评估之前，让我们先看看结果如何。这将是几个月的限制和非常高的疾病和死亡率在全国大部分地区（现在不是这样）匹配的结果与大多数西方国家。

@drbenjaminterry @meganranney How to do age adjustment is incredibly subjective. Excess mortality is not.

@Drbenjamurry@meganranney如何调整年龄是非常主观的。过度死亡率并非如此。

@DavidMooreSEP @greg_travis It's the universal three pronged obstruction disinformation playbook.
1. Not needed
2. Doesn't work
3. Costs outweigh benefits.
Doesn't matter for what, always works.

@DavidMooreSP@greg_travis这是一本通用的三管齐下的虚假信息剧本。
1.不需要
2.不起作用
3.成本大于收益。
不管发生什么，总是有用的。

@SixandLaura @fibke Rapidity and concentration of spread. When geographically dispersed, peaks occur at different times in different places so the overall average is lower for longer.

@SixandLaura@fibke传播的速度和集中度。当地理位置分散时，峰值出现在不同地点的不同时间，因此总体平均值在较长时间内较低。

@fibke @SixandLaura Makes more sense to compare with cities. NYC in spring 2020 was similar numbers. Still a tragedy no matter how you measure it.

@fibke@SixandLaura与城市相比更有意义。2020年春季的纽约市也出现了类似的数字。不管你怎么衡量，这仍然是一场悲剧。

@EnemyInAState Delta was similar.

@烯米酸三角洲也类似。

@mllichti @tar_xvzf @CamiloGuezRodri @Gab_H_R No, it won't, but it will certainly prioritize domestic inputs.

@mllichti@tar_xvzf@CamiloGuezRodri@Gab_H_R不，不会，但它肯定会优先考虑国内投入。

@lisa_iannattone @NickytaLeb "Are we really just going to keep recycling the failed hopium like this?"
Yup.
Once you've seen it a half dozen times already, if you expect anything different, you're the crazy one.

@lisa_iannattone@NickytaLeb“我们真的要继续像这样回收失败的hopium吗？”
是的。
一旦你已经看过六遍了，如果你期待有什么不同，你就是那个疯子。