@the_transit_guy @glasser Here's one that was mentioned in the thread https://t.co/KGkUSlruaY

@glasser这个家伙在帖子里提到过https://t.co/KGkUSlruaY

@the_transit_guy @glasser When masks were required it said so, and if you can find the odd place that does it probably still says that.
But it doesn't say "masks not required". It does still say things like "contact free pickup" and such.

@当需要戴口罩时，glasser的“运输人”说是这样的，如果你能找到一个奇怪的地方，它可能仍然这么说。
但它并没有说“不需要戴口罩”。它仍然会说“无接触皮卡”之类的话。

@the_transit_guy @glasser Google maps shows covid polices.

@glasser Google maps上的_transit_guy显示了新冠病毒的政策。

@the_transit_guy @SD70MACMAN True for concerts, not true for grocery stores.

@SD70MACMAN的_transit_guy@SD70MACMAN适用于音乐会，不适用于杂货店。

@greg_travis @hjelle_brian That make no sense. The blue chart is infections, right?
And it's interesting that even the background rate before the omicron surge was much higher (due to lingering/migrating delta surge I guess)

@greg_travis@hjelle_brian这毫无意义。蓝色图表是感染，对吗？
有趣的是，即使是在omicron激增之前，背景频率也要高得多（我猜是由于延迟/迁移的三角洲激增）

@greg_travis @hjelle_brian I don't either, just that 100x is a big difference. Takes a lot to offset that. We're not seeing it subjective either. During the peak people were getting infected right and left. Every small social circle had people sick. Now they're not, to the same extent.

@greg_travis@hjelle_brian我也不知道，只是100倍是一个很大的区别。要抵消这一点需要很多。我们也不认为这是主观的。在高峰期，人们左右都受到感染。每个小圈子都有人生病。但现在，它们的程度不同了。

@greg_travis @hjelle_brian Prevalence was probably 100x higher some places at peak vs. now. The usual masks people wear aren't 99% effective, so this is probably not correct. But the point of risk compensation and the risk also not being 100x lower is valid.

@greg_travis@hjelle_brian的患病率可能比现在高出100倍。人们通常戴的口罩没有99%的效果，所以这可能是不正确的。但风险补偿点和风险不低于100倍的点是有效的。

@JReinerMD @choo_ek If you're vaccinated, this virus can still kill you (but less likely).

@如果你接种了疫苗，这种病毒仍然可以杀死你（但可能性较小）。

@wsbgnl https://t.co/F2u3rVoNRf

@wsbgnlhttps://t.co/F2u3rVoNRf

@jmcrookston https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@杰姆克鲁克斯顿https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@Gab_H_R @NjbBari3 "We have tools"

@Gab_H_R@NjbBari3“我们有工具”

@Noahpinion Its not as bad as you think. Look at the very top.
The fit is mostly to how often votes are unanimous (meaning, recently, never).
I have no idea how good a fit that is.

@没有你想的那么糟。看看最上面。
这主要取决于投票结果是否一致（意味着最近从未一致）。
我不知道这有多合适。

@dgurdasani1 @AbundantLandUse I remember this being reported.
https://www.voanews.com/a/sout...

@dgurdasani1@AbundantLandUse我记得有人报道过这件事。
https://www.voanews.com/a/sout...

@justthefacts85 https://twitter.com/FDA_Drug_I...

@公正的事实85https://twitter.com/FDA_Drug_I...

@neoglobalist @AlecStapp Pretty much everyone replying missed that.

@几乎所有回复的人都忽略了这一点。

@VillaChicago @Debs_Kropotkin @wsbgnl Their brilliant model seems to be assuming no one uses a mask in China.

@VillaChicago@Debs_Kropotkin@wsbgnl他们的出色模型似乎假设在中国没有人使用口罩。

@Gab_H_R @LongDesertTrain You misspelled deception.

@你拼错了欺骗。

@jklmd123 @mattbc @CDCgov 50 cents vs 10 cents is why.

@jklmd123@mattbc@CDCgov 50美分对10美分就是原因。

@AbraarKaran There were some Auras in the mix but it was hit or miss based what happened to get shipped from the inventory of the stockpile.

@AbraarKaran混搭中有一些光环，但它是根据库存中发生的事情来决定的。

@MFEnriqueBK @rbtastic It would be easy to target relief to commercial drivers. They usually have fleet gas cards.

@MFEnriqueBK@rbtastic很容易将救援目标对准商业司机。他们通常有车队加油卡。