@WillBrockman2 @tvguy213 @SeattleiteLeo @wsbgnl Also was incorrect
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@WillBrockman2@tvguy213@Seattleteleo@wsbgnl也不正确
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@tvguy213 @SeattleiteLeo @wsbgnl You're citing the data from portion of the chart that is labeled as incomplete.
The most recent data not labeled as incomplete (about 3 weeks lagged) is 1.14 unvaccinated and 0.16 vaccinated.

@TVGY213@Seattleteleo@wsbgnl您引用的数据来自图表中标记为不完整的部分。
未标记为不完整（约滞后3周）的最新数据为1.14未接种和0.16接种。

@tvguy213 @SeattleiteLeo @wsbgnl Not even close in recent months.

@最近几个月，TVGY213@Seattleteleo@wsbgnl甚至没有关门。

@apmalong The best effort to be made, I think, is to cross correlate reported tests with wastewater. There doesn't seem to be a huge divergence at this point. https://t.co/U2365d4ZLb

@我认为，最好的办法是将报告的测试与废水相互关联。在这一点上似乎没有很大的分歧。https://t.co/U2365d4ZLb

@wsbgnl Most likely.

@wsbgnl最有可能。

@SeattleiteLeo @wsbgnl Majority, yes, but it's not like it's 99%. The out of control spread also endangers vaccinated, albeit less so.
Also, reasonably effective FOR NOW. The progression over time has been continually lower effectiveness (as expected and predicted). You think that stops now?

@Seattleteleo@wsbgnl多数票，是的，但并不是99%。失控的传播也危及接种疫苗的人，尽管情况并非如此。
而且，目前还相当有效。随着时间的推移，进展的有效性不断降低（正如预期和预测的那样）。你觉得现在停止了吗？

@FionaFaithRoss @luckytran Do your best with one way masking when necessary, and continue encouraging and pressuring institutions to do better with universal masking.

@Fiona Faithross@luckytran在必要时尽最大努力使用单向掩蔽，并继续鼓励和施压机构更好地使用通用掩蔽。

@luckytran You don't need to study filtration physics to understand this. People sometimes need to take off masks to hydrate, eat, take medicine, etc. Especially in workplaces and during travel. The only want to make that work is to minimize spreading of particles into the environment.

@幸运的是，你不需要学习过滤物理学就能理解这一点。人们有时需要摘下口罩来补充水分、进食、服药等，尤其是在工作场所和旅行期间。我们唯一想做的就是最大限度地减少颗粒物向环境中的扩散。

@wsbgnl A huge contribution to the Trump deficits, even during the pandemic were the tax cuts on the rich and on highly profitable corporations. Biden is trying to at least partially undo that, though he isn't likely to succeed.

@wsbgnl对特朗普赤字的巨大贡献，即使在疫情期间，也是对富人和高利润企业的减税。拜登正试图至少部分地消除这一点，尽管他不太可能成功。

@RationalScienc1 @Marco_Piani @freddiesayers Probably would have to do challenge trials, which was discussed at the time (you can find articles from 2020), but turned out not to be needed.

@RationalScienc1@Marco_Piani@freddiesayers可能需要进行挑战性试验，这在当时已经讨论过（你可以找到2020年的文章），但事实证明并不需要。

@_stah Everything is bigger in Texas?

@_斯塔：德克萨斯的一切都更大？

@eoteromuras @MarvinH2_G2 @thoaidngo It doesn't mean any of those things. Read the paper. It is an assessment of disease progression i.e. severity.

@eoteromuras@MarvinH2_G2@thoaidengo这并不意味着任何这些事情。读报纸。它是对疾病进展的评估，即严重程度。

@MarvinH2_G2 @thoaidngo #3 is particularly egregious. "Assistance needed" = mild?! 🤯

@MarvinH2#u G2@thoaidngo#3特别令人震惊。“需要帮助”=温和？！🤯

@greg_travis @hjelle_brian (BTW, if blue is "cases not infections", then it is mislabeled on your chart)

@greg_travis@hjelle_brian（顺便说一句，如果蓝色是“病例而非感染”，那么它在你的图表上的标签是错误的）

@greg_travis @hjelle_brian A week fine, you're pointing an arrow at a month before the peak.

@greg_travis@hjelle_brian一周好吧，你把箭指向了峰值前一个月。

@luishusier @NateSilver538 Correct. Cost of living was a huge issue for many people when inflation was 0%.

@luishusier@NateSilver538正确。当通货膨胀率为0%时，生活费用对许多人来说是个大问题。

@RootedCosmopol4 @juli_bg_bs I think so

@RootedCosmopol4@juli_bg_bs我想是的

@RootedCosmopol4 @juli_bg_bs R estimates have mostly been off for a while due to faster cycles. Few if any seemed to update their models.

@RootedCosmopol4@juli_bg_bs R估计值由于周期加快，大部分已经偏离了一段时间。几乎没有人更新他们的模型。

@RootedCosmopol4 @juli_bg_bs However, R of 1.5 is in line with previous surges. So it can, potentially, be very significant, just slower.

@RootedCosmopol4@juli_bg_bs然而，R为1.5与之前的激增一致。因此，它可能非常重要，只是速度较慢。

@RootedCosmopol4 @juli_bg_bs R was much higher than 1.5

@RootedCosmopol4@juli_bg_bs R远高于1.5