@gadboit @juli_bg_bs @Stockdog23 That's not quite right. NZ had community spread before lockdown and it would have continued to grow like everywhere else. The difference was willingness and ability to get to zero (including border control). Melbourne was similar. Took three months of lockdown to get to zero.

@gadboit@juli_bg_bs@Stockdog23这不太正确。在封锁之前，新西兰的社区已经扩散开来，它会像其他地方一样继续发展。区别在于达到零的意愿和能力（包括边境控制）。墨尔本也是如此。封锁了三个月才归零。

@juli_bg_bs @reidatcheson @gadboit @Stockdog23 It doesn't have to be everyone. Each person who gets vaccinated before being infected benefits.
Omicron didn't "negate" anything either. People getting infected (whether with Omicron or anything else) after being vaccinated is MUCH better than the reverse.

@juli_bg_bs@reidatcheson@gadboit@Stockdog23不一定是每个人。每个在感染前接种疫苗的人都会受益。
Omicron也没有“否定”任何东西。接种疫苗后感染（无论是奥米克罗还是其他什么）的人比接种疫苗后感染要好得多。

@TheAngryEpi Broadly speaking wastewater doesn't show much as of a week ago but there could be localized surges.
There is, however, an ongoing high level of pervasive transmission, even if not a surge.
https://biobot.io/data/ https://t.co/4fabmpUIbZ

@从广义上讲，Angryepi废水显示的情况不如一周前，但可能会出现局部激增。
然而，即使不是激增，仍有高水平的普遍传播。
https://biobot.io/data/ https://t.co/4fabmpUIbZ

@wsbgnl Ensured continued funding.

@wsbgnl确保继续提供资金。

@flowermusickids @ChristosArgyrop You can get 100 boosters.

@flowermusickids@ChristosArgyrop你可以得到100个助推器。

@GaloresCircus @TheAngryEpi @CDCDirector My wild guess is that she's effectively a tour guide and not an actual lab worker.

@GaloresCircus@TheAngryEpi@CDC主管我的猜测是，她实际上是一名导游，而不是一名真正的实验室工作人员。

@crkrjx @apoorva_nyc @CarlosdelRio7 A cutoff based on a financing scheme has no scientific validity at all, but I'm sure you agree.

@crkrjx@apoorva_nyc@Carlosdellio7基于融资方案的中断完全没有科学依据，但我相信你同意。

@apoorva_nyc @crkrjx @CarlosdelRio7 Also, the article doesn't cite any research in support of 65 as a cutoff, although it quotes a few people saying it. The only research mentioned was 60+.

@apoorva_nyc@crkrjx@carlosdellio7同样，这篇文章没有引用任何支持65岁的研究作为临界值，尽管它引用了一些人的说法。唯一提到的研究是60+。

@apoorva_nyc @crkrjx @CarlosdelRio7 The article doesn't explain why 50-64 is authorized but not <50.

@apoorva_nyc@crkrjx@carlosdellio7这篇文章没有解释为什么50-64被授权，但没有<；50

@apoorva_nyc This whole paragraph is likely a quote but the first sentence reads as if it is being presented as fact or the as the author's opinion. https://t.co/xGOaeF5mnm

@apoorva_nyc这整段话很可能是引用，但第一句话读起来似乎是以事实或作者的观点呈现的。https://t.co/xGOaeF5mnm

@tvguy213 @SeattleiteLeo @wsbgnl Not correct.

@TVGY213@Seattleteleo@wsbgnl不正确。

@tvguy213 @SeattleiteLeo @wsbgnl That's not correct.

@TVGY213@Seattleteleo@wsbgnl这是不对的。

@tvguy213 @SeattleiteLeo @wsbgnl Well they likely are. If someone got vaxed outside of NY they won't find the record and will count it as unvaxed.
If you look at other legitimate studies like VA or CDC they show lower VE for death than would be suggested by NYC reports. Even with NYC data it's not 99% or 95%.

@TVGY213@Seattleteleo@wsbgnl他们很可能是。如果有人在纽约以外的地方被VAX，他们将找不到该记录，并将其视为未被VAX。
如果你看看其他合法的研究，比如VA或CDC，他们显示VE对死亡的影响低于纽约市报告的建议。即使有纽约市的数据，也不是99%或95%。

@tvguy213 @SeattleiteLeo @wsbgnl I'm not sure what you mean but if you look at the peak it is 65 and 7, about the same (i.e. <90% ratio). NYC has always overstated unvax deaths on recent data because they count deaths as unvaxed w/unknown vax status. May ultimately still be overstated if data never lines up.

@TVGY213@Seattleteleo@wsbgnl我不确定你的意思，但如果你看看峰值，它是65和7，大致相同（即<；90%的比例）。纽约市在最近的数据中一直高估了未经课税的死亡人数，因为他们将死亡人数计算为未经课税且vax状态未知。如果数据不一致，最终可能仍会被夸大。

@tvguy213 @SeattleiteLeo @wsbgnl Yes
https://www1.nyc.gov/site/doh/... https://t.co/OUWwq6WbfP

@TVGY213@Seattleteleo@wsbgnl是
https://www1.nyc.gov/site/doh/...对不起，对不起。https://t.co/OUWwq6WbfP

@headgsd @Theminist_ @ocnj3 @wsbgnl @SheriD17536431 Depending on face shape and mask construction (and somewhat user care, at least for the nose clip), sometimes they fit quite well. It's hit or miss.

@headgsd@Theminist_@ocnj3@wsbgnl@SheriD17536431取决于脸型和口罩构造（以及一定程度的用户护理，至少是鼻夹），有时它们非常适合。这是命中注定的。

@P5120Anna @sarahbeth345 @alexmeshkin It doesn't matter, it's still a useful metaphor. No one is literally testing kids here.

@P5120Anna@sarahbeth345@alexmeshkin没关系，这仍然是一个有用的隐喻。这里没有人真的在测试孩子。

@chargrille @LMplusG @Gab_H_R "When a public health expert says it, it carries more weight"

@Chargrill@LMplusG@Gab_H_R“当一位公共卫生专家这么说时，它的重量更大”

@FinchTH @MagisterBracey @DrLeanaWen @CNN I'm not sure paid, but her access as a white house insider is contengent on helping to "shape public opinion" since when she says something it "carries more weight" https://t.co/vYMgiUkEJb

@FinchTH@MagisterBracey@DrLeanaWen@CNN我不确定是否有报酬，但作为白宫内部人士，她在帮助“塑造公众舆论”方面存在争议，因为她说的话“更有分量”https://t.co/vYMgiUkEJb

@PaulaVSimon1 @WinterPollan @TheAngryEpi @DrLeanaWen It's not always immediate money but it's always ambition of some sort.

@PaulaVSimon1@WinterPollan@TheAngryEpi@DrLeanaWen这并不总是直接的钱，但总是某种野心。