@olliecarroll @AbraxasSpa Was it even the case then?
https://twitter.com/Austen/sta...

@olliecarroll @AbraxasSpa 是这样吗？
https://twitter.com/Austen/sta...

@KawasakiKR11 @AbundantLandUse @tnicholsmd @BoobyJargon This is how minimum requirements often become maximums.

@KawasakiKR11 @AbundantLandUse @tnicholsmd @BoobyJargon 这就是最低要求经常变成最高要求的方式。

@mr_james_c @Austen Okay, who else >>with significant reach<< has used that map?
Austen is clearly referring to Elon here. There's no reason not to name him.

@mr_james_c @Austen 好的，还有谁

@mr_james_c @Austen Who else has used that map?

@mr_james_c @Austen 还有谁用过那张地图？

@Austen @mr_james_c "People" = Elon Musk

@Austen @mr_james_c “人” = Elon Musk

@BobKitten @ISanderson @GinnyClausen @qualityfind @colbertlateshow Symptoms sometimes come back after finishing the Paxlovid 5-day course.

@BobKitten @ISanderson @GinnyClausen @qualityfind @colbertlateshow 症状有时会在完成 Paxlovid 5 天课程后再次出现。

@halspadgett @CorsIAQ What's a BFF?

@halspadgett @CorsIAQ 什么是 BFF？

@zanfr @squirrelpalooza @TheCBDiva @wsbgnl How many times did UK government claim it wasn't going to lock down, only to lock down (half assed anyway) later and after far more spread? I lost track.

@zanfr @squirrelpalooza @TheCBDiva @wsbgnl 英国政府有多少次声称它不会锁定，只是在稍后和更多传播之后锁定（无论如何都是半途而废）？我迷失了方向。

@squirrelpalooza @TheCBDiva @wsbgnl Partially that. But also being willing to recontain, not "live with the virus" after early 2020. Shanghai had a very large outbreak in 2022, tens of thousands of cases at least. But it didn't spread significantly to the other 1.4 billion from there either.

@squirrelpalooza @TheCBDiva @wsbgnl 部分是这样。但也愿意重新遏制，而不是在 2020 年初之后“与病毒共存”。上海在 2022 年爆发了非常大的疫情，至少有几万例。但它也没有从那里显着传播到其他 14 亿人。

@TheCBDiva @wsbgnl I wonder how many people understand that the average person in China has been locked down for about 5 days. It is a different strategy but it isn't one that accepts locking everyone down for long periods as a supreme sacrifice against disease either.

@TheCBDiva @wsbgnl 我不知道有多少人知道中国普通人被封锁了大约5天。这是一种不同的策略，但它也不接受将每个人长期关押作为对抗疾病的最高牺牲。

@GeorgeHappens @FinchTH Lots of blame to go around.

@GeorgeHappens @FinchTH 有很多责备。

@theripsnorter @jbarab Five times the risk may quite reasonably call for different workplace safety measures. IFR is useless without considering the denominator and means of transmission (and non-fatality risks). Rabies (IFR 100%) is less of a threat in most workplaces than influenza or covid.

@theripsnorter @jbarab 五倍的风险可能相当合理地要求采取不同的工作场所安全措施。如果不考虑分母和传播方式（以及非死亡风险），IFR 是无用的。在大多数工作场所，狂犬病 (IFR 100%) 的威胁要小于流感或新冠病毒。

@DrEricDing "We had the tools"

@DrEricDing “我们有工具”

@YouAreLobbyLud @NjbBari3 David Leonhardt is going to feature this in his newsletter tomorrow, right? Right?

@YouAreLobbyLud @NjbBari3 David Leonhardt 明天将在他的时事通讯中对此进行介绍，对吧？正确的？

@_mbdr_ @steelha1 If there are air vents you can attach a filter to them. Not hepa (very likely too much resistance) but still better than nothing.

@_mbdr_ @steelha1 如果有通风口，您可以在其上安装过滤器。不是肝细胞（很可能是阻力太大），但总比没有好。

@FinchTH (see also reply to this tweet with ridiculous animation)
https://twitter.com/WHO/status...

@FinchTH（另请参阅用荒谬的动画回复此推文）
https://twitter.com/WHO/status...

@AGoldsmithEsq I'm not, I'm just observing that US doesn't have unlimited leverage and freedom of action on the matter.

@AGoldsmithEsq 我不是，我只是观察到美国在这件事上没有无限的影响力和行动自由。

@AGoldsmithEsq Oh, he can retaliate and very well may, but it will probably be largely symbolic like the Khashoggi sanctions were. But who knows THIS could be a major pivot point in the relationship, though I think it unlikely.

@AGoldsmithEsq 哦，他可以报复，而且很有可能，但它可能在很大程度上像 Khashoggi 制裁一样具有象征意义。但谁知道这可能是关系中的一个主要支点，尽管我认为这不太可能。

@AGoldsmithEsq As you well know, US support for KSA is based on a combination fo factors, oil supply being one (and a small cut doesn't even necessarily change that calculus), counter to Iran being another. Empowering Iran isn't necessarily a good trade here.

@AGoldsmithEsq 众所周知，美国对 KSA 的支持是基于多种因素的组合，石油供应是其中之一（小幅削减甚至不一定会改变这种计算），而伊朗则是另一个因素。赋予伊朗权力在这里并不一定是一笔好的交易。

@AGoldsmithEsq This will only happen if doing so is net-net better for US interests as perceived by US policy makers. Not because it feels better. It's probably not.

@AGoldsmithEsq 只有在美国政策制定者认为这样做有利于美国利益的情况下才会发生这种情况。不是因为感觉更好。可能不是。