@olga_basso @MeetJess I'm less concerned about ignoring than I am about utterly lacking the capacity to do anything about it.

@olga_basso @MeetJess 我不太关心忽略，而是完全缺乏对此做任何事情的能力。

@KremlinTrolls https://t.co/RqvsHTMVA4

@克里姆林巨魔 https://t.co/RqvsHTMVA4

@KremlinTrolls Why is there a flash visible in one frame at 0:03 when the truck is still there?

@KremlinTrolls 为什么卡车还在那里时，在 0:03 的一帧中可以看到闪光？

@AntD1975 @cz_binance @elonmusk @muskQu0tes If all the people who sit on their ass in front of a computer or talk on the phone were working from home, you'd have little or no traffic when going to install air conditioners.

@AntD1975 @cz_binance @elonmusk @muskQu0tes 如果所有坐在电脑前或打电话的人都在家工作，那么在安装空调时，您将很少或根本没有交通。

@Monogrammaton @NavyPrism @alexmeshkin Don't trust any one measure. They're all risk reduction.

@Monogrammaton @NavyPrism @alexmeshkin 不要相信任何一种措施。他们都是降低风险。

@alexmeshkin It's only 4% (1 in 25) and I'm sure it skews older.

@alexmeshkin 只有 4%（25 分之 1），而且我敢肯定它偏老。

@mom_spokane @FinchTH Different one. TV doc in fact. Who would ever guess that?

@mom_spokane @FinchTH 不同的。实际上是电视文档。谁会猜到呢？

@FinchTH Close calls of catastrophic outcomes are a sure warning that you are you are taking too much risk. You can expect the disaster to happen after a few close calls +/-.

@FinchTH 对灾难性结果的密切关注是一个明确的警告，表明你正在冒太大的风险。您可以预期灾难会在几次近距离通话后发生/-。

@Cccsjb @FinchTH TF is one to listen to. Some others not so much.

@Cccsjb @FinchTH TF 值得一听。其他一些则不然。

@Drferremd @FinchTH I wouldn't rule that out.

@Drferremd @FinchTH 我不排除这种可能性。

@x2IndSpeculator @fitterhappierAJ They didn't forget, they're lying about it.

@x2IndSpeculator @fitterhappierAJ 他们没有忘记，他们在撒谎。

@AltMiddlePeds @efb_1 @ddiamond @EricTopol @jonfavs "Didn't show beenfit" does not imply "no benefit". You analyze data, merge with understanding of mechanisms, and hypothesize. Totally scientific, despite inherent imperfect information.
Reasonable to want different/better communication. Indeed "follow the science" is a slogan.

@AltMiddlePeds @efb_1 @ddiamond @EricTopol @jonfavs “没有表现出适合”并不意味着“没有好处”。你分析数据，结合对机制的理解，并进行假设。尽管存在固有的不完善信息，但完全科学。
想要不同/更好的沟通是合理的。的确，“遵循科学”是一个口号。

@efb_1 @AltMiddlePeds @ddiamond @EricTopol @jonfavs Beg to differ. Scientific method is iterative: hypothesis, experiment, analyze. Israel hypothesized that boosters would be useful, gave them to people, and analyzed the data, which was supportive. US further hypothesized that boosters would be useful and proposed to use them.

@efb_1 @AltMiddlePeds @ddiamond @EricTopol @jonfavs 求不同。科学方法是迭代的：假设、实验、分析。以色列假设助推器会很有用，将它们提供给人们，并分析了支持性的数据。美国进一步假设助推器会很有用，并建议使用它们。

@ModeledBehavior Toward making workers poorer?

@ModeledBehavior 让工人变得更穷？

@AltMiddlePeds @ddiamond @EricTopol @jonfavs There was large scale scientific evidence from Israel supporting boosters. It wasn't absolutely conclusive but it was the best available at the time. Either a decision to go with boosters, or not, would have been a judgement call informed by science.

@AltMiddlePeds @ddiamond @EricTopol @jonfavs 有来自以色列的大规模科学证据支持助推器。这不是绝对的结论，但它是当时最好的。是否使用助推器的决定将是科学的判断。

@AltMiddlePeds @ddiamond @EricTopol @jonfavs "Scientific method" can encompass a lot of things including making an informed real time judgement from available but limited evidence amid uncertainty and immediate hazard to health and life. It doesn't only refer to ponderous academic processes that take years.

@AltMiddlePeds @ddiamond @EricTopol @jonfavs “科学方法”可以包含很多东西，包括在不确定性和对健康和生命的直接危害的情况下，根据可用但有限的证据做出明智的实时判断。它不仅仅指需要数年时间的繁重学术过程。

@LouiseMensch @ParkerMolloy @MSignorile @maggieNYT @jaredkushner She's not responsible for what her mom does. That's a smear by association and not informative.

@LouiseMensch @ParkerMolloy @MSignorile @maggieNYT @jaredkushner 她不对她妈妈的所作所为负责。这是协会的抹黑，而不是提供信息。

@OmicronData @BallouxFrancois @gadboit More on this https://twitter.com/ddiamond/s...

@OmicronData @BallouxFrancois @gadboit 更多关于这个 https://twitter.com/ddiamond/s...

@NgoTheWorld @AbundantLandUse Nice mask.

@NgoTheWorld @AbundantLandUse 不错的面具。

@gadboit Anecdotes don't mean it doesn't reduce infection and is "failing" (though it still may not and may be).

@gadboit 轶事并不意味着它不会减少感染并且“失败”（尽管它仍然可能不会并且可能会）。