@Fritz844 That's not state media

@Fritz844 那不是官方媒体

@talesftf @elonmusk Not all do, there are many routes without snow or otherwise less than extreme conditions.

@talesftf @elonmusk 并非所有人都这样做，有许多路线没有下雪或其他极端条件。

@TQuestMind @elonmusk You'd have to be beyond stupid to take an electric semi to a conventional gas station.

@TQuestMind @elonmusk 你必须非常愚蠢才能将电动半挂车带到传统的加油站。

@Incindery1 You're assuming it works.

@Incindery1您假设它有效。

@Incindery1 Terrorist small bomb or even a large warhead that fizzles (wouldn't rule this out given what we've seen of other Russian weapons) would be survivable if you're not too close. Successful strategic attack on NYC if you in NYC, no.

@Incindery1 如果您不太靠近，恐怖分子的小型炸弹甚至是会失效的大型弹头（鉴于我们所看到的其他俄罗斯武器，不排除这种可能性）将是可以生存的。如果你在纽约，对纽约的成功战略攻击，不。

@SiyuanWang_PhD @joeyfox85 @famulare_mike @RealSexyCyborg I don't understand this concept. If you filter 1 cf of clean air you have zero effective filtration, right?

@SiyuanWang_PhD @joeyfox85 @famulare_mike @RealSexyCyborg 我不明白这个概念。如果您过滤 1 cf 的清洁空气，您的有效过滤效率为零，对吗？

@GainOfDystopia @SiyuanWang_PhD Seems even less effective for a much larger space and much bigger surfaces. Probably better to use wipes and/or a stronger UVC (not far). Both can't hurt though.

@GainOfDystopia @SiyuanWang_PhD 对于更大的空间和更大的表面，似乎效果更差。使用擦拭巾和/或更强的 UVC（不远）可能会更好。不过两者都伤不起。

@GainOfDystopia @SiyuanWang_PhD No doubt.

@GainOfDystopia @SiyuanWang_PhD 毫无疑问。

@GainOfDystopia @SiyuanWang_PhD I think it's be very useful mounted permanently on the roof of the vehicle. In that case it would disinfect from previous passengers over time, even if infection from say the immediately previous passenger might not yet. But less so carrying a portable device yourself.

@GainOfDystopia @SiyuanWang_PhD 我认为永久安装在车顶上非常有用。在这种情况下，它会随着时间的推移对之前的乘客进行消毒，即使之前的乘客可能还没有感染。但自己携带便携式设备则更少。

@GainOfDystopia @sejarzo @Don_Milton @MackayIM @mskathleenquinn @yelalott @drkristenkc @CathNoakes @Globalbiosec @linseymarr Hey, in 20 years.

@GainOfDystopia @sejarzo @Don_Milton @MackayIM @mskathleenquinn @yelalott @drkristenkc @CathNoakes @Globalbiosec @linseymarr 嘿，20 年后。

@GainOfDystopia @SiyuanWang_PhD Good point, though you probably need to direct it more at the surfaces than air in that case.

@GainOfDystopia @SiyuanWang_PhD 好点，但在这种情况下，您可能需要将其更多地指向表面而不是空气。

@GainOfDystopia @SiyuanWang_PhD In those rare situation when you can't turn off recirculate then I guess it is better than nothing but not great. I'd rather be uncomfortable in most cases though.

@GainOfDystopia @SiyuanWang_PhD 在那些无法关闭再循环的罕见情况下，我想这总比没有好，但不是很好。不过，在大多数情况下，我宁愿感到不舒服。

@86thistimeline @LazarusLong13 So they cancel out, right?

@86thistimeline @LazarusLong13 所以他们取消了，对吧？

@GainOfDystopia @SiyuanWang_PhD Just turn on ventilation (or crack windows of course). 1 or a few ACH seems like a distraction.

@GainOfDystopia @SiyuanWang_PhD 只需打开通风（当然也可以打开窗户）。 1 个或几个 ACH 似乎让人分心。

@sejarzo @GainOfDystopia @Don_Milton @MackayIM @mskathleenquinn @yelalott @drkristenkc @CathNoakes @Globalbiosec @linseymarr It's probably both. Even at those ACH rates you can still get meaningful buildup with very low volume per occupant and multiple emitters (quite possible with high circulation rates).

@sejarzo @GainOfDystopia @Don_Milton @MackayIM @mskathleenquinn @yelalott @drkristenkc @CathNoakes @Globalbiosec @linseymarr 可能两者兼而有之。即使在这些 ACH 速率下，您仍然可以获得有意义的积聚，每个居住者的体积非常低，并且有多个发射器（在高循环率的情况下很可能）。

@GainOfDystopia @sejarzo @Don_Milton @MackayIM @mskathleenquinn @yelalott @drkristenkc @CathNoakes @Globalbiosec @linseymarr Equivalent ACH on the bigger planes is more effective anyway (far field) because there is more volume per occupant. The smaller planes seems much more hazardous.

@GainOfDystopia @sejarzo @Don_Milton @MackayIM @mskathleenquinn @yelalott @drkristenkc @CathNoakes @Globalbiosec @linseymarr 在更大的飞机上等效的 ACH 更有效（远场），因为每个乘客的体积更大。较小的飞机似乎更危险。

@GainOfDystopia @sejarzo @Don_Milton @MackayIM @mskathleenquinn @yelalott @drkristenkc @CathNoakes @Globalbiosec @linseymarr I guess it doesn't matter that much. Just a layer as you say.

@GainOfDystopia @sejarzo @Don_Milton @MackayIM @mskathleenquinn @yelalott @drkristenkc @CathNoakes @Globalbiosec @linseymarr 我想这并不重要。只是你说的一层。

@emjaco_ @andrew__rea Day trip from Miami

@emjaco_ @andrew__rea 迈阿密一日游

@mattyglesias Not too late for Donald shoes.

@mattyglesias 对于唐纳德鞋来说还不算太晚。

@GainOfDystopia @sejarzo @Don_Milton @MackayIM @mskathleenquinn @yelalott @drkristenkc @CathNoakes @Globalbiosec @linseymarr How old? American Airlines average fleet age is 12 years (meaning a lot are even older than that).

@GainOfDystopia @sejarzo @Don_Milton @MackayIM @mskathleenquinn @yelalott @drkristenkc @CathNoakes @Globalbiosec @linseymarr 几岁？美国航空公司的平均机龄为 12 年（这意味着很多机队甚至比这还要老）。