@jvmlost @alexmeshkin Maybe https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@alexmeshkin I remember someone saying that the EUA does not disqualify on the basis of having taken it recently/already, so could apply to a rebound as if a new case, so <5 days from "onset" of symptoms and high risk.
发表时间：4年前 作者：aeon @AeonCoin@jvmlosthttps://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@alexmeshkin我记得有人说过，EUA不会因为最近/已经采取行动而取消资格，所以可以像处理新案件一样申请反弹，所以<；症状和高风险“发作”后5天。
@alexmeshkin I remember someone saying that the EUA does not disqualify on the basis of having taken it recently/already, so could apply to a rebound as if a new case, so <5 days from "onset" of symptoms and high risk.
@alexmeshkin我记得有人说过，EUA不会因为最近/已经采取行动而取消资格，所以可以像处理新案件一样申请反弹，所以<；症状和高风险“发作”后5天。
@jimhome15 @yaneerbaryam @djackson_new Mostly not
https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/m... https://t.co/lereljpGNR
@jimhome15@yaneerbaryam@djackson\u new大多不是
https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/m...对不起，对不起。https://t.co/lereljpGNR
@RoderickA1 @tarapalmeri @juliaioffe No chance as long as there is a D in the white house. It accomplishes nothing and long term Republicans benefit more from the filibuster than from eliminating it.
@RoderickA1@tarapalmeri@juliaioffe只要白宫有D就没有机会。它一事无成，长期来看，共和党人从阻挠议事中获得的好处比消除它更多。
@nailatrahman @NickytaLeb @FinchTH But in reality these decision are being made on the basis of political perception, not science. Which is why all it took to completely flip the overt messaging was a memo and a few low quality focus groups.
@nailatrahman@NickytaLeb@FinchTH但实际上，这些决定是基于政治认知而非科学做出的。这就是为什么完全颠覆公开信息所需要的只是一份备忘录和几个低质量的焦点小组。
@nailatrahman @NickytaLeb @FinchTH Biden is by many accounts not the sharpest pencil in the drawer and in any case there has always been a lot of confusion on these things. He stood up and said if you get the vaccine you won't get covid. Probably he understands it has changed but just how deeply he understands? 🤷
@很多人都说，奈拉特曼（NickytaLeb）芬奇·拜登（FinchTH Biden）不是抽屉里最锋利的铅笔，而且无论如何，在这些东西上总是有很多困惑。他站起来说，如果你接种疫苗，就不会感染新冠病毒。也许他明白这已经改变了，但他理解的有多深？🤷
@NickytaLeb @FinchTH If I'm not mistaken, this was before the leaked memo mapping out the "declare victory and gaslight the public" plan, and before the Biden administration sabotaged it's own opportunity to renew funding. It was clear from the strategic configuration this is where they were going.
@NickytaLeb@FinchTH如果我没有弄错的话，这是在泄露的备忘录制定“宣布胜利并向公众加油”计划之前，也是在拜登政府破坏其自身的资金更新机会之前。从战略布局来看，这是他们的目标。
@NickytaLeb @FinchTH Because it wasn't going to be done in time for the O wave and the strategy was herd immunity, plus focused protection using an extra booster (which not many got in any case).
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@TheSkylineTrail @NKinNewEng @wsbgnl They want the most widespread and fastest surge in order to hope for a sustained period of quiescence from acquired immunity during the midterm elections in order to be able to focus the campaign on things other than the catastrophically failed pandemic response.
发表时间：4年前 作者：aeon @AeonCoin@NickytaLeb@FinchTH，因为它不会在O波前及时完成，策略是群体免疫，加上使用额外助推器的集中保护（在任何情况下都没有多少人得到）。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@他们希望得到最广泛和最快的增兵，以期在中期选举期间从获得的免疫力中获得一段持续的平静期，以便能够将竞选活动的重点放在灾难性失败的大流行反应以外的事情上。
@tylerblack32 @zhang_yueting @loscharlos @DailyJLee IIRC Omicron also escaped a lot of immunity from prior infection. It seems odd.
I'm not sure what you mean by "vulnerable and vaccinated" here
@tylerblack32@zhang\u yueting@loscharlos@DailyJLee IIRC Omicron也逃脱了之前感染的大量免疫力。这似乎很奇怪。
我不知道你说的“脆弱和接种疫苗”是什么意思
@ariccio @farid__jalali Adding the advantages isn't valid.
If B has advantage over A and C has the same advantage over B, C does not necessarily have twice the advantage over A. In theory it might even have a disadvantage.
@ariccio@farid\uuu jalali补充这些优势是无效的。
如果B比A有优势，而C比B有同样的优势，那么C不一定比A有两倍的优势。理论上，它甚至可能有劣势。