@RidleyDM @Rose_Marie_Holt If you're ever in a situation of needing one, try the VFlex N95. They're so breathable, I honestly can't detect any breathing difference, little issue of temperature, doesn't block voices (does block lip visibility of course), many smells penetrate (they're not particles).

@RidleyDM@Rose\u Marie\u Holt如果您需要，请尝试VFlex N95。它们非常透气，老实说，我检测不到任何呼吸差异，温度的小问题，不会阻挡声音（当然会阻挡嘴唇的可见度），许多气味穿透（它们不是微粒）。

@RidleyDM @Rose_Marie_Holt It can be much worse than a cold even if vaccinated, and that's not even all that unusual. But I can still see a reasonable risk calculation to roll the dice and not pay a significant price every single day to reduce risk.

@RidleyDM@Rose\u Marie\u Holt即使接种了疫苗，也可能比感冒严重得多，这并不奇怪。但我仍然可以看到一个合理的风险计算来掷骰子，而不是每天都要付出巨大的代价来降低风险。

@jvmlost @alexmeshkin Yeah, very different from my understanding (no 1st hand experience). The biggest obstacle seems to be run-around getting seen for someone to order it. Pharmacy inventory used to be a challenge but not so much recently.

@jvmlost@alexmeshkin是的，与我的理解非常不同（没有第一手经验）。最大的障碍似乎是到处跑，让人看到有人点餐。药房库存过去是一个挑战，但最近并没有这么大。

@RidleyDM @Rose_Marie_Holt People obviously have different tolerance of masks and tolerance of risks. But the excess focus on just masks is as if they are the one true solution is misplaced in any case which was sort of the point here.

@RidleyDM@Rose\u Marie\u Holt人群对面具的耐受性和风险的耐受性明显不同。但过度关注面具就好像它们是一个真正的解决方案，在任何情况下都是错误的，这在某种程度上是这里的重点。

@MarkFos32617741 @Noahpinion A good portion of NYC tax revenue does come from property taxes, though not specifically land value. The comments about high % of income tax from ultrahigh income don't really account for this, although tight budgets can't tolerate even small % shortfalls, so still important.

@MarkFos32617741@Noahpinion纽约市税收的很大一部分确实来自财产税，但不具体是土地价值。关于超高收入高%所得税的评论并不能真正解释这一点，尽管紧缩的预算不能容忍哪怕是很小的%短缺，所以仍然很重要。

@Rose_Marie_Holt @RidleyDM @mrpunan @FinchTH @jvmlost @coolpix_jpg @cre8iverenewal @ToshiAkima The thread was mostly about filtration/clean air. If the air is clean enough, you practically don't need a mask (w/exceptions), as with outdoors

@Rose\u Marie\u Holt@RidleyDM@mrpunan@FinchTH@jvmlost@coolpix\u jpg@cre8iverenewal@ToshiAkima这篇文章主要是关于过滤/清洁空气。如果空气足够干净，你实际上就不需要像在户外那样戴口罩（有例外）

@RidleyDM @Rose_Marie_Holt Well, there's a range of covid experiences. Some of them (even not hospitalized) are a lot worse than others. One of the most careful people I know has had covid twice (2nd was worse). Very much does not want to repeat. YMMV.

@RidleyDM@Rose\u Marie\u Holt嗯，有一系列新冠病毒的经历。他们中的一些人（甚至没有住院）比其他人更糟糕。我认识的最细心的人之一曾两次感染新冠病毒（第二次更糟）。非常不想重复。YMMV。

@_Kodos_ @humftydrumpfty @DrTomFrieden Also, while the don't account for a large number of cases, vulnerable people in Alameda when they need to work, shop, etc. are better protected due to others wearing masks, even not great ones (2 way making > 1 way). That's a major benefit not visible on a graph.

@_Kodos\uu@humftydrumpfty@DrTomFrieden也认为，虽然口罩数量不多，但阿拉米达的弱势人群在需要工作、购物等时，由于其他人佩戴口罩，即使不是很好的口罩，也能得到更好的保护（双向制作>；单向）。这是图表上看不到的一个主要好处。

@_Kodos_ @humftydrumpfty @DrTomFrieden Funny, I thought I explained right up there how small counties with a lot of mixing when people shop, work, live, socialize, and visit entertainment in other counties can't ever have different trajectories. Alameda imports cases and exports mitigation. Regions almost always align

@_Kodos\uuU@humftydrumpfty@DrTomFrieden有趣的是，我想我已经在上面解释了当人们在其他国家购物、工作、生活、社交和参观娱乐时，有很多混合的小国家是如何不会有不同的轨迹的。Alameda导入案例并导出缓解措施。区域几乎总是对齐

@jvmlost @mrpunan @FinchTH @Rose_Marie_Holt @RidleyDM @coolpix_jpg @cre8iverenewal @ToshiAkima Yes it was a generalization about outdoors. Indoors even with clean air under the same conditions (prolonged close contact) you would need masks to be protected as well, but not routine.

@jvmlost@mrpunan@FinchTH@Rose\u Marie\u Holt@RidleyDM@coolpix\u jpg@cre8iverenewal@ToshiAkima是的，这是对户外的概括。在室内，即使在同样的条件下（长时间的密切接触）有清洁的空气，你也需要保护口罩，但不是常规的。

@jvmlost @alexmeshkin From what I've heard in the past few months, it has been readily available to anyone in the US who meets the criteria of <5 days + risk factors. There may be some disagreement on risk factors in individual cases but not for an 81 year old.

@jvmlost@alexmeshkin据我在过去几个月里听到的消息，在美国，任何符合<；5天+风险因素。在个别病例中，对风险因素可能存在一些分歧，但对于81岁的人来说，则不存在分歧。

@alexmeshkin The point is not whether it is good science (does it even work at all on vaccinated people?) but whether prescribers have the option. By the wording of the EUA, they probably do.

@亚历克斯·梅希金（alexmeshkin）关键不在于这是否是一门好科学（它是否对接种疫苗的人有效？）但医生是否有选择权。根据欧盟联盟的措辞，他们可能会这样做。

@janko_js @NickytaLeb @FinchTH https://twitter.com/BernieDogs...

@janko\u js@NickytaLeb@FinchTHhttps://twitter.com/BernieDogs...

@mrpunan @FinchTH @Rose_Marie_Holt @RidleyDM @jvmlost @coolpix_jpg @cre8iverenewal @ToshiAkima 1. You can't eat/drink with a mask.
2. Comfort level of a good mask vs no mask is less
3. Some people can't wear masks
4. No outlets, carrying a small plug-in was a (probably misleading) model of scaled filtration
5. Outdoors you don't need masks. Why not have clean air indoors?

@mrpunan@FinchTH@Rose\u Marie\u Holt@RidleyDM@jvmlost@coolpix\u jpg@cre8iverenewal@ToshiAkima 1。你不能带着面具吃/喝东西。
2、好的口罩与没有口罩相比舒适度更低
3、有些人不能戴口罩
4、没有插座，携带一个小插件是一种（可能会误导人的）按比例过滤模型
户外你不需要面具。为什么室内没有干净的空气？

@Cointelegraph It wasn't at all the first.

@这根本不是第一次。

@Noahpinion Well, it could also change its tax system.

@没什么好担心的，它还可以改变它的税收制度。

@MarvinH2_G2 @demo_beta_v2 @EricTopol (There are a few different subthreads there where it is explored a bit.)

@MarvinH2\u G2@demo\u beta\u v2@EricTopol（这里有一些不同的子线程，我们将对此进行一些探讨。）

@MarvinH2_G2 @demo_beta_v2 @EricTopol The only way to do that is something like a PAPR. If you just carry around an air cleaner, you're cleaning the air in your environment (good!), but not the air YOU breathe in. I discussed the later idea a bit here:
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@MarvinH2\u G2@demo\u beta\u v2@EricTopol唯一的方法是类似PAPR的东西。如果你随身携带一个空气滤清器，你就是在清洁你周围的空气（很好！），但不是你吸入的空气。我在这里讨论了后面的想法：
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@itosettiMD_MBA @RyanMarino @chron Most Americans do not consider it particularly legit (> "some") and the current numbers are probably quite a bit lower.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/1... https://t.co/SolTCIfdTL

@itosettiMD\u MBA@RyanMarino@chron大多数美国人并不认为它特别合法（>；“一些”），目前的数字可能要低一些。
https://news.gallup.com/poll/1... https://t.co/SolTCIfdTL

@awsparling @ariccio @farid__jalali Sometimes it is very hard to measure. e.g. Omicron might not even be more transmissible than Delta w/o previous immunity.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@awsparling@ariccio@farid\uu jalali有时很难衡量。e、 g.Omicron甚至可能不会比没有先前免疫的Delta更具传染性。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...