How do we create a culture where it's harder to set (or become) the topic of public conversation by doing something terrible and easier to do so by doing something great?

我们如何创造一种文化，在这种文化中，做一些糟糕的事情更难成为公众谈话的话题，做一些伟大的事情更容易成为公众谈话的话题？

@Crowd33 @tjayrush Really? I thought it was crucial in keeping WoW fun.

@Crowd33@tjayrush真的吗？我认为这对保持魔兽世界的乐趣至关重要。

@tjayrush Can't they do this already?
(government agencies maintaining opaque shadowy records of who's been acting in ways they don't like, that is)
Feels like SBTs would be a step backwards for them, as the target immediately knows they're being watched.

@tjayrush他们不能已经这么做了吗？
（也就是说，政府机构对谁以他们不喜欢的方式行事保持不透明的模糊记录）
感觉SBT对他们来说是一种倒退，因为目标立即知道他们正在被监视。

@vgr Does progress studies actually have that much of an accumulation-centric frame? I see some accumulation focus, but also a lot of "we need to cut the red tape".

@vgr进展研究真的有那么多以积累为中心的框架吗？我看到一些积累的重点，但也有很多“我们需要削减繁文缛节”。

@AbuSpinky @ne0liberal @elonmusk @JeffBezos Oh I've been banned from a chat for being a fake at least once.

@AbuSpinky@ne0liberal@elonmusk@JeffBezos噢，我被禁止聊天，因为我至少有一次是假的。

@ne0liberal Maybe @elonmusk and @JeffBezos should pop into some discord chats more!

@ne0liberal也许@elonmusk和@JeffBezos应该多加入一些不和谐的聊天！

@ne0liberal (btw btw I'm not a billionaire anymore)

@ne0liberal（顺便说一句，我不再是亿万富翁了）

@ne0liberal What happened to "talking directly to the people" being a virtue?
(btw I particularly appreciate that Elon and Jeff actually respond to people, and don't just shout their own stuff)

@“直接与人民对话”是一种美德，这是怎么回事？
（顺便说一句，我特别赞赏埃隆和杰夫实际上是在回应人们，而不仅仅是大喊自己的东西）

@owocki @octanaiv @glenweyl I still think nrx is halfway between corplib and synthtech, it's not corplib directly 😀
Great job on the graphics!

@owocki@octanaiv@glenweyl我仍然认为nrx介于corplib和synthtech之间，它不是corplib直接😀
图形方面做得很好！

@danrobinson @AnthonyLeeZhang Like, the biggest remaining thing I want out of defi at this point is "make a prediction market that people actually want to participate in". And that's already pretty niche, and prediction markets are already a public epistemics technology more than just a finance technology.

@danrobinson@AnthonyLeeZhang Like，目前我想从defi中得到的最大剩余的东西是“做出一个人们真正想要参与的预测市场”。这已经是一个很好的定位，预测市场已经是一种公众认知技术，而不仅仅是一种金融技术。

@danrobinson @AnthonyLeeZhang I think my own view at this point is that we're very far along the diminishing returns curve of finance; sure, reducing spreads by 0.15% is nice, but it's far from utopia-or-dystopia-deciding, whereas say innovations in social media or governance still can be that impactful.

@danrobinson@AnthonyLeeZhang我认为我个人的观点是，我们离金融收益递减曲线很远；诚然，将息差减少0.15%是好事，但这远不是乌托邦或反乌托邦的决定，而社交媒体或治理方面的创新仍然会产生如此大的影响。

@MTabarrok @NiskanenCenter I do think a lot of @NiskanenCenter people have a similar trajectory of how their positions have changed over the last 20 years.

@MTabarrok@Niskanenter我认为很多Niskanenter的人都有类似的轨迹，他们的立场在过去20年中发生了怎样的变化。

@MTabarrok ok on second thought I guess "GMU but pivoted to wokes are correct" is pretty close to @NiskanenCenter

@MTabarrok好的，我想“GMU但以wokes为轴是正确的”非常接近于@Niskanenter

@MTabarrok Yeah the group thing is hard. Like for a hypothetical example, would the GMU econ blob be capable of executing a full pivot to "actually the wokes are basically correct"? Or would the members just leave one-by-one for other blobs? But even that's hard.

@MTabarrok是的，团队的事情很难。就像一个假设的例子一样，GMU econ blob是否能够执行一个完整的枢轴，以“实际上wokes基本上是正确的”？或者，成员们会一个接一个地离开去其他地方吗？但即使这样也很难。

(Note to trolls: no, ethereum was not a mistake. Sorry, my viewpoints that PoS > PoW, reaching functionality escape velocity is important, and not-just-currency apps are good are unchanged)

（巨魔注意：不，以太坊不是一个错误。对不起，我的观点是，PoS>；PoW、达到功能逃逸速度很重要，而且不仅仅是货币应用程序很好，这些观点都没有改变）

I do notice lots of people just choosing either hyper-loyal commitment to a cause to an extent that prohibits admitting fault beyond a limited range, and lots of other people just resigning themselves to being pure ivory tower scholars.

我确实注意到，很多人只是选择了对某一事业的超忠诚承诺，在一定程度上禁止承认有限范围以外的错误，而其他许多人只是放弃了自己，成为纯粹的象牙塔学者。

It's hard. Eventually you make a mistake in your beliefs, and (especially if you are in politics, but some other domains too) correcting that mistake means acknowledging that a previous version of yourself contributed negative value to the world.

这很难。最终，你会在自己的信仰上犯错误，并且（特别是如果你在政治领域，但也在其他领域）纠正这个错误意味着承认以前版本的自己为世界带来了负面价值。

One broader sort-of-contradiction I think about is the open-mindedness vs passion tradeoff.
Is it possible to both passionately act on the world based on your current beliefs and be open minded to the possibility that those beliefs are very wrong?
How do yall handle this?

我认为一种更广泛的矛盾是思想开放与激情的权衡。
有没有可能既基于你当前的信仰对这个世界充满激情地行动，又对那些信仰非常错误的可能性持开放态度？
雅尔如何处理？

@zengjiajun_eth Decentralized currency =

@曾家俊eth分散货币=

@LaojunYangming @zengjiajun_eth Ok that just sounds like a pun for "violating regulations" 😂😭

@LaojunYangming@zengjiajun\u eth好，听起来像是“违反规定”的双关语😂😭