@willwarren @stonecoldpat0 ERC-4337 is moving forward! And there are companion EIPs to eventually bring the gains over to existing accounts on the main chain, reduce gas costs for SC wallets, etc.
@willwarren@stonecoldpat0 ERC-4337正在前进！此外，还有配套的EIP，最终将收益转移到主链上的现有客户，降低SC钱包的汽油成本等。
@smolwet @stonecoldpat0 1. It's just soooo much less code to accomplish the same thing
2. More flexibility (eg. supports signer accountability, in-place key changes, recovery, move to post-quantum algos)
@smolwet@stonecoldpat0 1。完成同样的事情所需的代码太少了
2、更大的灵活性（例如，支持签名者责任、就地关键更改、恢复、迁移到后quantum算法）
@WHITEMAN_YOLO @stonecoldpat0 That requires account abstraction to work well.
@WHITEMAN\u YOLO@stonecoldpat0需要帐户抽象才能正常工作。
@OverHTMoooooon @cornoisseur Let's see how well @optimismPBC governance and other governance experiments go!
@overhtmoooon@cornoiseur让我们看看@optimmpbc治理和其他治理实验进展如何！
@stonecoldpat0 If a fifth of the effort that has gone into these incredibly mathematically clever MPC workarounds had instead gone into protocol-level account abstraction, we would be at wallet security utopia by now. 😡
@stonecoldpat0如果这些在数学上非常聪明的MPC解决方案中所做的努力有五分之一用于协议级别的帐户抽象，那么我们现在将处于钱包安全乌托邦。😡
@stonecoldpat0 This saddens me. ECDSA is a bad signature algorithm. We should be coordinating to replace it, not local-optimizing our way toward entrenching it further.
@stonecoldpat0这让我很难过。ECDSA是一种错误的签名算法。我们应该协调以取代它，而不是局部优化我们进一步巩固它的方式。
@cornoisseur UV lamps being considered for anti-virus use are in the 220-260 nm range.
@考虑用于抗病毒的Cornoiseur紫外线灯的波长范围为220-260 nm。
@cornoisseur https://octodent.com/blogs/res.... https://t.co/9cTaxX9sTP
@角斗士https://octodent.com/blogs/res....对不起，对不起。https://t.co/9cTaxX9sTP
@marcusdiazeth 2A is great against human or large-animal attackers (and maybe some drones, though that's hard) but defense against viruses does require different tech imo.
@marcusdiazeth 2A对人类或大型动物袭击者（可能还有一些无人机，虽然这很难）的防御效果很好，但对病毒的防御确实需要不同的技术。
In a saner world the libertarians would be as excited about this stuff as we are about fireproof metal hardware wallets. Self-sovereign local community biodefense as an alternative to centralized lockdowns and quarantines.
That world is still possible! https://twitter.com/RealSexyCy...
New wall-mounted Buterin-Wu Fixture (Open-Source Upper Room UVGI) design. Can be up to 150cm long, more tightly controlled UV irradiation zone, can be made locally, out of local materials, for under $25 with a lower cost diode laser engraver like this:
https://www.kickstarter.com/pr... https://t.co/oS3lwZXWf2
在一个更加理智的世界里，自由主义者会对这种东西感到兴奋，就像我们对防火金属硬件钱包一样。自主的当地社区生物防御系统，作为集中封锁和隔离的替代方案。
那个世界仍然是可能的！https://twitter.com/RealSexyCy...
新的壁挂式Buterin Wu夹具（开源Upper Room UVGI）设计。最长可达150cm，紫外线照射区控制更严格，可以用当地材料在当地制作，成本低于25美元，使用成本更低的二极管激光雕刻机，如下所示：
https://www.kickstarter.com/pr...https://t.co/oS3lwZXWf2
RT: Finalized no. 35
https://blog.ethereum.org/2022...
tl;dr below
RT：第35号定稿
https://blog.ethereum.org/2022...
tl；以下dr
@robinhanson @AnthonyLeeZhang Though maybe there's a market-incentives argument that the gov should auction the land off into a Haberger tax scheme, and use the proceeds to buy up 2x more land and put *that* under the same scheme, so you have 2*X hybrid property instead of X full-gov property.
@robinhanson@AnthonyLeeZhang尽管可能有一种市场激励的论点，即政府应该将土地拍卖成哈贝格税计划，并用所得购买2倍以上的土地，并将其置于同一计划之下，因此你拥有2 X混合房产，而不是X完全的政府房产。
@robinhanson @AnthonyLeeZhang I guess government-owned land isn't *really* inalienable, though cultural memes about privatization of green stuff leading to dystopia do make it more difficult than most property to alienate.
@robinhanson@AnthonyLeeZhang我想政府拥有的土地并不是“真的”不可分割的，尽管有关绿色材料私有化导致反乌托邦的文化模因确实使其比大多数财产更难转让。
@robinhanson See thread with myself and @AnthonyLeeZhang on the sell versus extract rent tradeoff:
https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...
@AnthonyLeeZhang One possible argument is limits to political stability: even one very incompetent and/or reckless administration can destroy an SWF forever, whereas the right to keep extracting medium-level land taxes is de-facto inalienable.
发表时间：4年前 作者：vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin@robinhanson与我和AnthonyLeeZhang讨论了出售与提取租金的权衡：
https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...
@AnthonyLeeShang一个可能的论点是限制政治稳定：即使是一个非常无能和/或鲁莽的政府也可能永远摧毁主权财富基金，而继续征收中等水平土地税的权利实际上是不可剥夺的。
RT: EF Data Availability Sampling (DAS) RFP just released
https://github.com/ethereum/re...
DAS is a hard but critical problem to solve in order to take us from EIP 4844 to our fully scalable future.
$1.5M in funding earmarked for proposals!
We're happy to chat to help get you up to speed
转发：EF数据可用性采样（DAS）RFP刚刚发布
https://github.com/ethereum/re...
为了将我们从EIP 4844带到完全可扩展的未来，DAS是一个很难解决但至关重要的问题。
150万美元专项资金用于提案！
我们很高兴与您聊天，帮助您了解最新情况
@JeffKirdeikis @xalewic @AutismCapital Oh yeah I totally agree there. I oppose single entities having the ability to turn stuff on and off for large groups of people.
@JeffKirdeikis@xalewic@AutismCapital噢，是的，我完全同意这一点。我反对单个实体有能力为大群体的人打开和关闭东西。
@xalewic @JeffKirdeikis @AutismCapital The tone reads as sympathetic to the global (not just American) concerns, no?
@xalewic@JeffKirdeikis@AutismCapital这种语气读起来是同情全球（不仅仅是美国）的担忧，不是吗？
@JeffKirdeikis @xalewic @AutismCapital My point being that the World Economic Forum is a *forum*, like Bitcointalk is a forum. The point is to aggregate different perspectives, not to publish pieces that it as an organization fully stands behind.
@JeffKirdeikis@xalewic@AutismCapital我的观点是，世界经济论坛是一个论坛，就像Bitcointalk是一个论坛一样。关键是聚合不同的观点，而不是发布it作为一个组织完全支持的内容。
@JeffKirdeikis @xalewic @AutismCapital Here's a WEF piece that's clearly pro-privacy:
https://www.weforum.org/agenda... https://t.co/ULADWWexnc
@JeffKirdeikis@xalewic@AutismCapital这里有一篇WEF文章，明确支持隐私：
https://www.weforum.org/agenda...对不起，对不起。https://t.co/ULADWWexnc
@JeffKirdeikis @xalewic @AutismCapital Meanwhile here's a different WEF article that references that one, and describes the scenario in it as at least partially dystopian:
https://www.weforum.org/agenda... https://t.co/Ne7wAay0FF
@JeffKirdeikis@Xaleic@AutismCapital与此同时，WEF的另一篇文章引用了这篇文章，并将其中的场景描述为至少部分反乌托邦：
https://www.weforum.org/agenda...https://t.co/Ne7wAay0FF