Quick math explanation:
This is a blinded proof of membership. We want to prove `P(z) = y` without revealing `z` (but `y` is public). Normally, a proof is `Q = (P - y) / (X - z)`. Here, we instead do `Q = (P - y) / (rX - rz)` to blind `z`.
And prove that `z` is a root of unity. https://twitter.com/IACR_News/... https://t.co/H91JYbA60c

快速数学解释：
这是一份盲目的会员证明。我们想证明'P（z）=y'，但不透露'z'（但'y'是公开的）。通常，证明是` Q=（P-y）/（X-z）`。在这里，我们用Q=（P-y）/（rX-rz）`来盲取z。
证明“z”是统一的根。https://twitter.com/IACR_News/...https://t.co/H91JYbA60c

RT: Caulk is out! Caulk achieves zero-knowledge lookups and membership proofs up to 100x faster than Poseidon Merkle trees. Joint work with Mary Maller, @VitalikButerin, @Khovr, @13portocale and @CryptoSimkin 👇🏽 https://twitter.com/IACR_News/...

RT：填缝料出来了！Caulk实现了零知识查找和成员资格证明，比Poseidon Merkle树快100倍。与Mary Maller、VitalikButerin、Khovr、13portocale和CryptoSimkin合作👇🏽 https://twitter.com/IACR_News/...

@tszzl https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

与TSZLhttps://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

@AndrewYang Any intetest in quadratic voting or quadratic funding?
https://vitalik.ca/general/201...

@AndrewYang在二次投票或二次融资方面有什么创新吗？
https://vitalik.ca/general/201...

RT: ⟠ Latest Week in Ethereum News!
⛅ @Cloudflare to stake their $ETH to support the Merge
🐼 @dannyryan mainnet-shadow-fork-5 went exceedingly well
🛡️ @fredriksvantes client bug bounties now $250k
https://weekinethereumnews.com...
Thanks to @NexusMutual for making this issue possible 🙏

转发：⟠ 以太坊新闻最新一周！
⛅ @Cloudflare将入股$ETH以支持合并
🐼 @dannyryan mainnet-shadow-fork-5进行得非常好
🛡️ @fredriksvantes客户bug悬赏现在25万美元
https://weekinethereumnews.com...
感谢@NexusMutual使此问题成为可能🙏

I love seeing people with .eth in their handles arguing with each other on twitter.
Diversity of opinions is fun, and it's even more fun when there's an in-your-face reminder that no matter how much you disagree on small stuff ultimately you still love the same cryptocurrency.

我喜欢看到别人和我在一起。他们在推特上互相争吵。
意见的多样性很有趣，当你的脸上有一个提醒，无论你在小事上有多大分歧，最终你仍然喜欢相同的加密货币时，这就更有趣了。

@gotojedi @dankrad @AnthonyLeeZhang @RobMcNealy But do we need the bulk of the population to be involved to get that outcome?
Like, I feel like our civilization today is very capable of appreciating the beauty of Mandelbrot sets, but >90% of the population probably thinks that's a type of pastry.

@gotojedi@dankrad@AnthonyLeeZhang@RobMcNealy但我们是否需要大部分人口参与才能取得这一结果？
比如，我觉得我们今天的文明非常有能力欣赏曼德尔布罗特布景的美，但是>；90%的人可能认为这是一种糕点。

RT: Get your #Ethereum Merge alpha here!
https://eth2.news/
All your regular updates on What's New in #Eth2 in one handy place.
Bullish Merge! 🐼

RT：在这里获取您的#以太坊合并alpha！
https://eth2.news/
所有关于#Eth2新增内容的定期更新都可以在一个方便的地方进行。
看涨合并！🐼

RT: Today is the day to turn up the volume on the clr fund matching round hosted by @ethStaker, the EF, and @clrfund! What can you do to get this opportunity in front of the right eyes?
https://qf.ethstaker.cc/ https://t.co/TQdmdAoMUR

RT：今天是由@ethStaker、EF和@clrfund主办的clr基金配对回合的开盘日！你能做些什么让这个机会摆在右眼面前？
https://qf.ethstaker.cc/https://t.co/TQdmdAoMUR

@0x81B @AnthonyLeeZhang @RobMcNealy Are there still paper forms? I thought everything got wechat-mini-programified over the last two years?
(I actually don't know, I was last in China in Jan 2020 and have not since been back for obvious reasons)

@0x81B@AnthonyLeeZhang@RobMcNealy还有纸质表格吗？我以为在过去的两年里，所有的东西都被微信程序化了？
（实际上我不知道，我最后一次来中国是在2020年1月，后来由于明显的原因没有回来）

@m_j_rossman @AnthonyLeeZhang @RobMcNealy Oh I actually think the idea of languages where the writer's UI and the reader's UI are different, which requires computers to be possible, is fascinating.

@m\U j\u rossman@AnthonyLeeZhang@RobMcNealy噢，我实际上认为，作者的UI和读者的UI不同的语言的想法很吸引人，这要求计算机成为可能。

@RobMcNealy @AnthonyLeeZhang I think this question is actually different from the cursive debate, because:
https://mobile.twitter.com/Vit...

@RobMcNealy@AnthonyLeeZhang我认为这个问题实际上不同于草书辩论，因为：
https://mobile.twitter.com/Vit...

@dankrad @AnthonyLeeZhang @RobMcNealy But my own experience suggests the exact opposite! My knowledge of them is completely one-way

@dankrad@AnthonyLeeZhang@RobMcNealy，但我自己的经验表明恰恰相反！我对它们的了解完全是单向的

@AnthonyLeeZhang @RobMcNealy Question for you: would you dispute my intuition that it seems like there's basically no reason for anyone to learn to write chinese characters by hand at this point?

@AnthonyLeeZhang@RobMcNealy问你一个问题：你会质疑我的直觉吗？我的直觉是，现在似乎根本没有理由让任何人学习手写汉字？

@zmanian @sreeramkannan @least_nathan @tarunchitra @hosseeb Yeah I agree, but I do think it's possible for an app ecosystem to "accidentally" move toward >100x security leverage for other reasons as well, and it will happen many times in the future.

@zmanian@sreeramkannan@least\u nathan@Taruncitra@hosseeb是的，我同意，但我确实认为应用生态系统有可能“意外”走向>；由于其他原因，安全利用率达到100倍，而且这种情况在未来还会发生很多次。

@gugukhumalo198 @AnthonyLeeZhang 区块链和游戏有一个共享的历史，也有一个共享的未来。

@gugukhumalo198 @AnthonyLeeZhang 区块链和游戏有一个共享的历史，也有一个共享的未来。

@sreeramkannan @least_nathan @zmanian @tarunchitra @hosseeb (Of course, in an ecosystem with cross-chain asset holdings [not the same as cross-chain atomic swaps!], "recovery" requires all chains to coordinate a governance intervention, which is why I'm against cross-chain asset holdings!)
https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

@sreeramkannan@least\u nathan@zmanian@Taruncitra@hosseeb（当然，在一个拥有跨链资产的生态系统中[与跨链原子掉期不同！]，“恢复”要求所有链协调治理干预，这就是为什么我反对跨链资产持有！）
https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

@sreeramkannan @least_nathan @zmanian @tarunchitra @hosseeb Requiring TVL < STK/3 for security is really restrictive!
This is why I think it's really important for chains to not just protect against 51% attacks, but also be able to recover from them.

@sreeramkannan@least\u nathan@zmanian@Taruncitra@hosseeb需要TVL<；STK/3的安全性非常严格！
这就是为什么我认为链条不仅要防止51%的攻击，而且要能够从中恢复，这一点非常重要。

@AnthonyLeeZhang Video games are imo delegitimized much more than they deserve to be.

@AnthonyLeeZhang视频游戏在我看来被取消合法化的程度远远超过了它们应有的程度。

@econoar Oh I agree! To be clear when I criticize defi I'm criticizing either (i) bad defi or (ii) excessive optimization in defi to the point where you're squeezing out tiny percentage gains but forgetting to make the simpler and dumber stuff more resilient and accessible

@哦，我同意！要清楚的是，当我批评defi时，我是在批评（I）糟糕的defi或（ii）过度优化defi，以至于你挤出了微小的百分比收益，但忘记了让更简单、更愚蠢的东西更具弹性和可访问性