@cafreiman @NathanpmYoung 2/3 of global inequality is between countries, 1/3 is within countries, so this is actually a pretty big deal.

@cafreiman @NathanpmYoung 2/3 的全球不平等发生在国家之间，1/3 在国家内部，所以这实际上是一件大事。

@cafreiman @NathanpmYoung Also philanthropy wins on being more internationalist. Government programs have a strong track record of favoring the welfare of the gov's own citizens, even when those citizens are much richer and helping them is much more expensive than helping people elsewhere around the world

@cafreiman @NathanpmYoung 慈善也因更加国际化而获胜。政府项目在支持政府本国公民的福利方面有着良好的记录，即使这些公民更富有并且帮助他们比帮助世界其他地方的人更昂贵

@cafreiman @NathanpmYoung Philanthropy's meta-level virtue is that it's pluralist. We already have trillions of dollars distributed by various gov agencies, adding tens of billions allocated by a mechanism that selects for very different kinds of people brings needed (and high-quality) variety.

@cafreiman @NathanpmYoung Philanthropy 的元级美德是它是多元化的。我们已经有数万亿美元由各个政府机构分配，加上数百亿美元是由一种机制分配的，该机制为非常不同的人带来所需的（和高质量的）多样性。

@robinhanson Arbitration.

@robinhanson 仲裁。

RT: BLS signatures let you aggregate many signatures into one, so less data is stored on chain. BLS Wallet is a tool for builders to bring the the magic of BLS to their wallet or dapp for lower L2 gas fees 🙌
Read more and try it out: https://medium.com/privacy-sca...

RT：BLS 签名可让您将多个签名聚合为一个，因此链上存储的数据更少。 BLS 钱包是开发者将 BLS 的魔力带到他们的钱包或 dapp 以降低 L2 汽油费的工具🙌
阅读更多并尝试一下：https://medium。 com/privacy-sca...

Harberger taxes on NFTs are good.
See also, this from a year ago:
https://old.reddit.com/r/ether... https://twitter.com/ArthurB/st...

Harberger 对 NFT 征税很好。
另请参阅，这是一年前的：
https://old.reddit.com/r/ether... https://twitter.com/ArthurB/st...

@ArthurB Yeah, but the fork choice does a huge number of confirmations from randomly selected validators in parallel for each slot.

@ArthurB 是的，但是分叉​​选择会为每个插槽并行地从随机选择的验证器中进行大量确认。

@ArthurB The beacon chain already makes it require a >1/3 coalition to revert a block (unless you are guessing-a-private-key-level lucky in choosing coalitions). Though I agree that single slot finality is a significant further improvement.

@ArthurB 信标链已经使它需要一个

@mizbani_ @transmissions11 @gakonst Isn't that just a PLONK verifier with a "plug in your own verification key" feature?
(I don't think you can make it *fully* generic because there's lots of different ZK schemes out there, eg. based on pairings vs IPA vs hashes)

@mizbani_ @transmissions11 @gakonst 这不就是一个带有“插入自己的验证密钥”功能的 PLONK 验证器吗？
（我认为你不能让它*完全*通用，因为那里有很多不同的 ZK 方案，例如基于配对、IPA 和哈希）

Another great book by @Delphi_Digital, this time on rollups. https://twitter.com/jon_charb/...

@Delphi_Digital 的另一本好书，这次是关于汇总的。 https://twitter.com/jon_charb/...

RT: Fresh work on efficiently verifying large amounts of KZG multiproofs in the context of Ethereum's Data Availability Sampling! Research conducted with the impeccable @adietrichs and @dankrad!
https://ethresear.ch/t/a-unive...
1/N

RT：在以太坊数据可用性采样的背景下有效验证大量 KZG 多重证明的新工作！与无可挑剔的@adietrichs 和@dankrad 进行的研究！
https://ethresear.ch/t/a-统一...
1/N

@OptiChads @thejonmccoy cos when you multiply by a tan you're committing a sin

@OptiChads @thejonmccoy 因为当您乘以棕褐色时，您就犯了罪

@thejonmccoy Please don't use tan to generate your wallet seeds.

@thejonmccoy 请不要使用棕褐色来生成您的钱包种子。

The spikes emerge from good approximations to the circle ratio:
11/7 ~= tau/4 (or pi/2)
11 ~= 7/4 * tau (one full rotation plus 270.25')
So tan(11) is high: -225.95
The spikes near 355 and 710 are "echoes" of 11/7 created because 355/113 is an *amazing* approximation of tau/2

尖峰来自与圆比的良好近似：
11/7 ~= tau/4（或 pi/2）
11 ~= 7/4 * tau（一整圈加上 270.25'）
所以 tan(11) 很高：-225.95
355 和 710 附近的尖峰是 11/7 的“回声”，因为 355/113 是 tau/2 的*惊人*近似值

What's even more interesting is that tan(int) is *not* a random number generator. There's fascinating patterns in the data.
One way to look at it is: if tan(x) is very high, x is very close to a 90' or 270' angle. So if tan(x) and tan(y) are high, tan(x + 2y) is also high. https://t.co/W2QlBsUDBM

更有趣的是 tan(int) *不是*随机数生成器。数据中有迷人的模式。
一种看待它的方法是：如果 tan(x) 非常高，则 x 非常接近 90' 或 270' 角。因此，如果 tan(x) 和 tan(y) 很高，则 tan(x 2y) 也很高。 https://t.co/W2QlBsUDBM

And if you use tan^2 you get into total crazy land. https://t.co/g1Z9gIlRGL

如果您使用 tan^2，您将进入完全疯狂的土地。 https://t.co/g1Z9gIlRGL

I continue to find probability distributions with infinite means fascinating. Particularly how their averages *don't converge* as you sample more values.
You can even replicate the behavior deterministically with "tan at integers" as a pseudo-RNG. https://t.co/KmfUXpqKLx

我继续发现具有无限均值的概率分布令人着迷。特别是当您采样更多值时，它们的平均值如何*不收敛*。
您甚至可以使用“整数 tan”作为伪 RNG 来确定地复制行为。 https://t.co/KmfUXpqKLx

@AutismCapital My .png this morning was not good enough? ☺️
(Or does it need to be .jpg to be truly valuable in this space?)

@AutismCapital 我今天早上的 .png 还不够好？ ☺️
（或者是否需要 .jpg 才能在这个领域真正有价值？）

An explainer of the different types of ZK-EVMs and ZK-EVM-like projects out there, and the tradeoffs between them.
https://vitalik.eth.limo/gener...

解释了不同类型的 ZK-EVM 和类似 ZK-EVM 的项目，以及它们之间的权衡。
https://vitalik.eth.limo/gener...

@anderssandberg @MichaelDPlant Do we know of any ways to continue doing computation indefinitely given what we know about the universe / physics today? Or are we still at "there's only a limited number of non-reversible bit ops until we get to max entropy and we're screwed"?

@anderssandberg @MichaelDPlant 鉴于我们今天对宇宙/物理学的了解，我们是否知道任何方法可以无限期地继续进行计算？还是我们仍然处于“只有有限数量的不可逆位操作，直到我们达到最大熵并且我们被搞砸了”？