@BlockGeekDima But the number of hashes until the merge is fixed so energy waste is the same either way.
(Ok fine there's nuances around different types of hardware, but the statement is approximately true)

@BlockGeekDima 但是在合并之前的哈希数是固定的，因此能量浪费是相同的。
（好吧，不同类型的硬件存在细微差别，但该陈述大致正确）

RT: What's New in Eth2?
Um, nothing much happened this week 🤷‍♂️
But here you go anyway: https://eth2.news/
#Ethereum #Eth2

RT：Eth2 有什么新功能？
嗯，这周没什么大事🤷‍♂️
但无论如何你都去：https://eth2.news/

@SamoBurja Maybe they should just rebrand crickets as "land shrimp". It's not even all that biologically inaccurate!
https://cockroachfacts.com/are...

@SamoBurja 也许他们应该将蟋蟀重新命名为“陆地虾”。甚至在生物学上都不是那么不准确！
https://cockroachfacts.com/are...

@NathanpmYoung And sometimes getting stuff done is a really good way to improve your self-esteem and at least partially solve your emotional issues.
(Not always, but this has happened multiple times in my own experience)

@NathanpmYoung 有时完成工作是提高自尊心并至少部分解决情绪问题的好方法。
（并非总是如此，但根据我自己的经验，这种情况已经发生过多次）

@joshuamcclure @sama But AGI is also urgent because a good AGI friendliness solution is also decades away, so we have to get started now.
But yeah, bio is important too. Hence:
https://mobile.twitter.com/vit...

@joshuamcclure @sama 但是 AGI 也很紧迫，因为好的 AGI 友好解决方案也需要几十年的时间，所以我们现在必须开始。
但是，是的，生物也很重要。因此：
https://mobile.twitter.com/vit...

@FreedomMaxima What's "Entiuber"? Is it like a transportation service where you get carried around by big walking trees?

@FreedomMaxima 什么是“Entiuber”？这就像交通服务，你被大树带走吗？

@slouischarles @sama Oh I agree. The upshot is that if we get through this humanity is going to be unimaginably amazing in 200 years' time.

@slouischarles @sama 哦，我同意。结果是，如果我们通过这个人类将在 200 年后变得难以想象的惊人。

@optimal_taxer @sama errr if that's how ethics worked then we'd have a century-long tradition of utilitarians strongly advocating becoming a sperm bank donor, and the "e/acc" tribe would instead be advocating bombing the sperm bank to sabotage other people's samples before donating lots yourself

@optimal_taxer @sama errr 如果道德是这样运作的，那么我们将拥有长达一个世纪的功利主义者传统，强烈主张成为精子库捐赠者，而“e/acc”部落反而会提倡轰炸精子库以破坏其他人的精子库自己捐赠批次之前的样品

@marcelsalathe @sama Of course both are serious and both are way under-worried about compared to much milder stuff, but I think the case that the tail risks of AI are really really bad is pretty strong.

@marcelsalathe @sama 当然，两者都很严重，而且与温和得多的东西相比，两者都不太担心，但我认为 AI 的尾部风险真的很糟糕的情况非常强烈。

@marcelsalathe @sama "It hasn't killed people yet therefore let's ignore the weird mathy arguments about exponentials and focus on stuff in front of us today" feels really close to the logic that led to so many people ignoring covid in Jan 2020.

@marcelsalathe @sama “它还没有杀死人，因此让我们忽略关于指数的奇怪数学论点，专注于今天摆在我们面前的东西”感觉非常接近导致这么多人在 2020 年 1 月忽略 covid 的逻辑。

@marcelsalathe @sama Really faraway and self sufficient islands could close themselves off at the first sign of a 100% deadly pandemic. Scientists in Antarctica could also wait it out for a while then fly to some not yet inhabited island. Submarines.
Lots of survival options.

@marcelsalathe @sama 真正遥远且自给自足的岛屿可能会在出现 100% 致命流行病的第一个迹象时将自己关闭。南极洲的科学家也可以等待一段时间，然后飞往一些尚未有人居住的岛屿。潜艇。
很多生存选择。

RT: EDCON is back! you will not want to miss this!! Together with @deUETH on Aug 28th, come to the San Fran, CHASE CENTER. “Ethereum a New Era” will be hosting @drakefjustin @VitalikButerin @dannyryan @dankrad @adiasg @AyaMiyagotchi to discuss The Merge

RT：EDCON 回来了！你不会想错过这个的！ 8 月 28 日与@deUETH 一起来到 San Fran, CHASE CENTER。 “以太坊新时代”将主持@drakefjustin @VitalikButerin @dannyryan @dankrad @adiasg @AyaMiyagotchi 讨论合并

@sama Also, bio vs AI risk. A maximally terrible engineered pandemic is more likely to kill ~99.99% of humanity, leaving civilization room to recover from the remainder; AI will kill everyone. So it's another argument for caring about AI over bio.

@sama 另外，生物与人工智能的风险。一场极其可怕的工程大流行更有可能杀死约 99.99% 的人类，为剩余的人类留下恢复空间； AI会杀死所有人。所以这是关心人工智能而不是生物的另一个论点。

@sama It depends!
Worst-case nuclear war might kill 1-2 billion, full-on extinction will kill 8 billion, but adding in longtermist arguments the latter number grows to 999999...999 billion. So taking longtermist issues into account meaningfully changes relative priorities.

@sama 这取决于！
最坏的核战争可能会导致 1-20 亿人死亡，全面灭绝将导致 80 亿人死亡，但加上长期论点，后一个数字会增长到 999999...9990 亿。因此，考虑长期问题会有意义地改变相对优先事项。

@Chris_anthemumm @sama AI risk can't be the great filter, because from a "colonizing the universe" perspective an unfriendly AI-driven extinction probably isn't actually an extinction, it just turns whatever civilization creates it into a ball of terror expanding at nearly the speed of light.

@Chris_anthemumm @sama AI 风险不能成为伟大的过滤器，因为从“殖民宇宙”的角度来看，不友好的 AI 驱动的灭绝可能实际上并不是灭绝，它只是将任何文明创造出来的东西变成了一个恐怖的球。以接近光速的速度。

@sama I think the philosophical argument is that bad AI may kill us all in 50 years, but the bulk of the harm of such an extinction event comes from the trillions of future humans that will never have a chance to be born in the billions of years that follow.

@sama 我认为哲学上的论点是，糟糕的人工智能可能会在 50 年内杀死我们所有人，但这种灭绝事件的大部分危害来自未来数以万亿计的人类，他们将永远没有机会出生在数十亿随后的几年。

@sama I'd say @tylercowen style "actually GDP growth is really good and underrated because exponentials" also falls under longtermism.

@sama 我会说@tylercowen 风格“实际上 GDP 增长非常好并且被低估了，因为指数”也属于长期主义。

Regular reminder: all 5000+ of my instagram accounts are fake profiles and have nothing to do with me. Anything you see "Vitalik Buterin" (or "Bütеirn" or whatever) posting on instagram is a scam.

定期提醒：我的 5000 个 instagram 帐户都是假个人资料，与我无关。您在 Instagram 上看到的任何“Vitalik Buterin”（或“Bütеirn”或其他）都是骗局。

@0xfbifemboy @FatManTerra @pourteaux @midmagic This is fair, but is an even stronger argument for not trying to maintain your entire recovery setup by yourself.

@0xfbifemboy @FatManTerra @pourteaux @midmagic 这很公平，但对于不尝试自己维护整个恢复设置来说，这是一个更强有力的论据。

@FatManTerra @pourteaux @midmagic I'd just be more worried about screwing it up technically. And to avoid correlation risk you'd have to entrust family/friends/third parties to at least some of the shamir pieces anyway.

@FatManTerra @pourteaux @midmagic 我只是更担心在技术上搞砸了。为了避免相关风险，无论如何，您必须将至少一些 shamir 作品委托给家人/朋友/第三方。