用户 aeon(@ AeonCoin) 的最新消息

@garrett_brinton @RickABright @WHO @CEPIvaccines @IAVI @ACTAccelerator @POTUS @gatesfoundation "It's mild" is not even remotely a half truth. "Mild" illnesses don't kill significant numbers of people.
"Less severe" is probably true.

@garrett_brinton@RickABright@WHO@CEPIvaccines@IAVI@ACTAccelerator@POTUS@gatesfoundation“它是温和的”甚至都不是半真半假。“轻度”疾病不会导致大量人死亡。
“不那么严重”可能是正确的。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@roadapps23 @EricTopol The 4th shot did boost antibodies (about 5x). It didn't boost enough to reliably prevent infection.

@roadapps23@EricTopol第四次注射确实增加了抗体(约5倍)。它没有足够的动力来可靠地预防感染。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@lisa_iannattone @jljcolorado It's inconvenient to talk about at all because "covid doesn't spread in schools" and "schools don't drive covid spread".
(Neither of these is actually true.)

@lisa_iannattone@jljcolorado谈论这一点很不方便,因为“新冠病毒不会在学校传播”和“学校不会推动新冠病毒传播”。
(这两个事实都不是真的。)

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JonnaChissus @sinz54 @DrTomFrieden US and WHO criteria don't guarantee that those or any reasonable criteria will be satisfied soon or on any particular time frame at all. In history, pandemics have lasted decades or even centuries. The false notion that it must play out like 1918 and end soon has been harmful.

@JonnaChissus@sinz54@DrTomFrieden US和世卫组织的标准并不保证这些或任何合理的标准会很快或在任何特定的时间范围内得到满足。在历史上,流行病持续了几十年甚至几个世纪。认为它必须像1918年那样发展并很快结束的错误观念是有害的。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JonnaChissus @sinz54 @DrTomFrieden https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@sinz54 @DrTomFrieden The idea of moving away from the notion of a temporary emergency to a more ongoing management as we do with other hazards is reasonable. Part of the problem is a gaggle of interests pushing "it's over" every time a line on a chart veers downward for about 15 minutes.

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@JonnaChissus@sinz54@DrTomFriedenhttps://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@sinz54@DrTomFrieden从临时紧急情况的概念转移到更持续的管理,就像我们处理其他危险一样,这一想法是合理的。问题的一部分在于,每当图表上的一条线向下移动大约15分钟时,一群利益集团就会推动“一切都结束了”。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@sinz54 @DrTomFrieden The idea of moving away from the notion of a temporary emergency to a more ongoing management as we do with other hazards is reasonable. Part of the problem is a gaggle of interests pushing "it's over" every time a line on a chart veers downward for about 15 minutes.

@sinz54@DrTomFrieden从临时紧急情况的概念转移到更持续的管理,就像我们处理其他危险一样,这一想法是合理的。问题的一部分在于,每当图表上的一条线向下移动大约15分钟时,一群利益集团就会推动“一切都结束了”。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@sinz54 @DrTomFrieden Those private businesses are all subject to a plethora of safety codes.

@sinz54@DrTomFrieden这些私营企业都受到过多安全规范的约束。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@sinz54 @DrTomFrieden There are few outdoor mask mandates that point. They're all indoor, generally in businesses, all of which are licensed, in structures that are inspected and certified to be fit to occupy, subject to ongoing compliance with fire and other safety codes, etc.

@sinz54@DrTomFrieden这一点很少有户外面具授权。它们都是室内的,通常是在商业场所,所有这些场所都有许可证,在经过检查和认证适合居住的建筑物中,符合消防和其他安全规范,等等。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JHowardBrainMD @wsbgnl Long past the point where the quoters are more to blame than the quotees.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@tnicholsmd WHY DO WRITERS CONTINUE (OVER AND OVER AGAIN) TO QUOTE PEOPLE WHO CONSTANTLY GET IT WRONG?
Sorry for all caps, just amazed.

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@JHowardBrainMD@wsbgnl早就超过了引用人比被引用人更应该受到责备的地步。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@为什么作家们(一次又一次地)继续引用那些经常出错的人的话?
对所有的帽子感到抱歉,只是惊讶。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@ibrake4ants How is this even real. Amazing.
🤦

@我想知道这是怎么回事。太神了
🤦

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@nohomelikeplace Even universal masking isn't enough by itself. The study that was done for delta said that only stacked mitigations including frequent universal testing with good isolation would sort-of work, and even then something like 20% would get infected (vs nearly all without)

@没有像家一样的地方,即使是通用的掩蔽本身也是不够的。为德尔塔公司所做的研究表明,只有包括频繁的通用测试和良好的隔离度在内的一系列缓解措施才能起到一定的作用,即使这样,大约20%的人会被感染(而几乎所有人都没有感染)

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@flowermusickids Lunch, for sure.
Plus masking alone (even decent masks) is probably not enough to cram people in a room several hours a day five days a week. Not many schools are really on top of ventilation, testing, isolation (and not sending people back while still contagious) etc.

@当然,这是我的午餐。
再加上仅仅用面具(即使是像样的面具)可能不足以让人们一周五天每天在一个房间里挤上几个小时。没有多少学校真正做到了通风、测试、隔离(以及在传染时不把人送回去)等。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DecorumManager @justthefacts85 @CDCDirector @CDCgov My suggestion: https://t.co/BORuRTIxJP

@DecorumManager@justthefact85@cdcedirector@CDCgov我的建议:https://t.co/BORuRTIxJP

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DecorumManager @justthefacts85 @CDCDirector @CDCgov "'Wear a mask' is ... crystal clear"
Actual CDC guidance on mask wearing https://t.co/SIMAXSLfae

@DecorumManager@justthefacts85@cdcddirector@CDCgov“‘戴面具’是……非常清晰的”
CDC关于佩戴口罩的实际指导https://t.co/SIMAXSLfae

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@bradfordfini @Andre__Damon @BNODesk Crossing 2000 was before the 3900 print. But still well below 3500.

@bradfordfini@Andre_uuDamon@BNODesk Crossing 2000在3900印刷品之前。但仍远低于3500。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@NickytaLeb @MEDIUMZA9 @Craig_A_Spencer Harder to get a test as outbreak exploded = even more of the milder cases not identified.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@MEDIUMZA9 @Craig_A_Spencer @NickytaLeb There is probably much higher ascertainment on more severe cases. Vaxed mild case = self test or no test and carry on.

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@随着疫情爆发,NickytaLeb@MEDIUMZA9@Craig_A_Spencer更难进行检测=更多的轻微病例尚未确定。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@MEDIUMZA9@Craig_A_Spencer@NickytaLeb可能对更严重的病例有更高的确定率。VAX轻度情况=自检或不测试并继续。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@georgimarinov @wsbgnl @galenward If true, not any harder to stop, just more people with weak immunity running around spreading it.
https://www.medrxiv.org/conten... https://t.co/24N27GqiF7

@格奥尔基马里诺夫@wsbgnl@galenward如果是真的,没有更难阻止的,只是更多免疫力弱的人四处传播。
https://www.medrxiv.org/conten... https://t.co/24N27GqiF7

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@MEDIUMZA9 @Craig_A_Spencer @NickytaLeb There is probably much higher ascertainment on more severe cases. Vaxed mild case = self test or no test and carry on.

@MEDIUMZA9@Craig_A_Spencer@NickytaLeb可能对更严重的病例有更高的确定率。VAX轻度情况=自检或不测试并继续。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@heatherwritesss @wsbgnl Is it actually a public health task force or is it just pretending to be one?

@HeatherWritess@wsbgnl它实际上是一个公共卫生工作组,还是只是假装是一个?

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@CBoy287 @hjelle_brian He's in Taos

@CBoy287@hjelle_brian他在Taos

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情