用户 aeon(@ AeonCoin) 的最新消息

@dinodanny13 @bariweiss The teachers points are fine, I just don't agree they call for minimizing overall risks to kids (and not just narrowly defined individual medical or mortality risks) during the entirety of the pandemic. MANY kids have suffered extreme impact from loss of a parent or caregiver.

@dinodanny13@bariweiss老师们的观点很好,我只是不同意他们呼吁在流感大流行的整个过程中尽量降低儿童的总体风险(而不仅仅是狭义的个人医疗或死亡风险)。许多孩子因失去父母或照顾者而受到极大的影响。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@dinodanny13 @bariweiss You seem to be incapable of recognizing or more likely unwilling to recognize the point here. Good day.

@dinodanny13@bariweiss你似乎无法认识到或者更可能不愿意认识到这一点。很好的一天。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@dinodanny13 @bariweiss We're talking about risks of the claim that risks of the pandemic "were never" to kids. That includes the period of time before vaccines even existed.
Whether I live in Ontario is irrelevant, and I don't think the person tweeting here does either, but I could be wrong.

@dinodanny13@bariweiss我们谈论的是声称大流行风险“从未”对儿童造成的风险。这包括疫苗出现之前的一段时间。
我是否住在安大略省无关紧要,我也不认为在这里发推特的人会,但我可能错了。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@dinodanny13 @bariweiss Losing a parent or caregiver has an enormous, potentially life-long impact on a kid, arguably more so than a stint in hospital. It doesn't make sense to focus narrowly only on individualized medical impact, particularly in the case of kids.

@dinodanny13@bariweiss失去父母或照顾者对孩子有着巨大的、潜在的终身影响,可以说比住院时间更重要。狭隘地只关注个体化的医疗影响是没有意义的,尤其是在儿童的情况下。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@dinodanny13 @bariweiss The risks were not low. Look to how other cities had much higher death rates (adjusted for demographics) to see how many more kids could have lost parents and caregivers.
Policy now is a different question, but doesn't call for revisionism of past risks.

@dinodanny13@bariweiss风险并不低。看看其他城市的死亡率有多高(根据人口统计进行调整),看看还有多少孩子可能失去父母和照顾者。
现在的政策是另一个问题,但不需要对过去的风险进行修正主义。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@dinodanny13 @bariweiss The tweet claims risks "were never" to children. But in fact children lost many parents and caregivers, and could have lost even more. Yes, Canada did a better job of protecting the population, including families, than US or UK did, but the risks were always there.

@dinodanny13@bariweiss这条推特声称风险“从未”发生在儿童身上。但事实上,孩子们失去了许多父母和照顾者,甚至可能失去更多。是的,加拿大在保护包括家庭在内的人口方面比美国或英国做得更好,但风险总是存在的。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@sburke85 @danjcyr @heatherwritesss You don't understand how air filters work.
https://www.nature.com/article...

@sburke85@danjcyr@heatherwrites您不了解空气过滤器是如何工作的。
https://www.nature.com/article...

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Austen It probably goes the other way. People stop using it then eventually turn off the monthly sub.

@奥斯汀,可能是另一种情况。人们停止使用它,然后最终关闭每月sub。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@gatos_del @hjelle_brian It's just a zero covid policy and hamsters get infected and transmit. Nothing exotic going on here.

@gatos_del@hjelle_brian这只是一项零新冠病毒政策,仓鼠会被感染并传播。这里没有什么异国情调。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@MelpomeneMel @flowermusickids https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@jklmd123 @AGoldsmithEsq Parents are not the ones pushing it.
Parents:
Fully in person: 27%
Some or all online: 61%
https://twitter.com/wsbgnl/sta...

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@MelpomeneMel@flowermusickidshttps://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@jklmd123@AGoldsmithEsq的父母不是推动它的人。
父母:
亲自出席:27%
部分或全部在线:61%
https://twitter.com/wsbgnl/sta...

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@MargoLee You have a sore throat and it is getting worse.

@你喉咙痛,而且越来越严重。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@mskathleenquinn @angie_rasmussen @PerpetualWinger I'm expecting generational timescales before more people figure this out.

@Kathleenquin@angie_rasmussen@Perventalwinger女士我期待着在更多的人发现这一点之前,一代又一代的时间尺度。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JHowardBrainMD Also conditions under which trial conducted no longer exist.

@JHowardBrainMD还指出,进行试验的条件不再存在。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@justthefacts85 @Balgor11 "Going to tweet much less"

@JustTheFact85@Balgor11“将少发推特”

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@CT_Bergstrom Holy cow that looks JUST like the current model. https://t.co/ZRrjCaafiW

@CT_Bergstrom Holy cow,看起来就像现在的模型。https://t.co/ZRrjCaafiW

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@j_g_allen This is a myopically simplistic and overly-medicalized and -individualized view of a far more more complex problem.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@bariweiss 150k kids losing a parent or caregiver is absolutely risks to children.

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@j_g_!u allen这是一个目光短浅的简单化、过度医疗化和个人化的观点,对一个更为复杂的问题。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@bariweiss 15万儿童失去父母或照顾者对儿童来说绝对是一种风险。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@bariweiss 150k kids losing a parent or caregiver is absolutely risks to children.

@bariweiss 15万儿童失去父母或照顾者对儿童来说绝对是一种风险。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@AbraarKaran @GoldenRhino23 @KenSmith001 @washingtonpost I doubt this is significant unless you're in a very dirty environment.

@AbraarKaran@GoldenRhino23@KenSmith001@washingtonpost我怀疑这是否重要,除非你身处一个非常肮脏的环境。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@andrew_lilico Who is leading during Ukraine or inflation matters a lot.

@安德鲁·利利科(andrew_lilico)是乌克兰或通货膨胀时期的领导者,他非常重要。

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Balgor11 @justthefacts85 Correct https://t.co/U5nT3JNWPn

@Balgor11@justhefact85正确https://t.co/U5nT3JNWPn

发表时间:2年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情